Dental and facial skeletal characteristics and growth of females and males with Class II Division 1 malocclusion between the ages of 10 and 14 (revisited). Part II. Anteroposterior and vertical circumpubertal growth

American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 120, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 542-555

  Rothstein, Ted ^a,c   Phan, Xuan Lan ^b  

^a ST LUKE S ROOSEVELT HOSPITAL CENTER   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^c NONE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MAXILLOFACIAL DEVELOPMENT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PUBERTY; RADIOGRAPHY; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT;

ADOLESCENT; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS II; MAXILLOFACIAL DEVELOPMENT; PUBERTY; SEX CHARACTERISTICS;

EID: 0035513492     PISSN: 08895406     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mod.2001.118628     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Tulloch JF, Phillips C, Koch G, Proffit WR. The effect of early intervention on skeletal pattern in Class II malocclusion: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997; 111:391-400.
2. Rothstein T, Yoon-Tarlie C. Dental and facial skeletal characteristics of males and females with Class II, Division 1 malocclusion between the ages of 10 and 14 (revisited). Part I: Characteristics of size form and position. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;117:320-32.
3. Jacobson A. The proportionate template as a diagnostic aid. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1979;75:156-72.
4. Jacobson A, Kilpatrick, M. Proportionate template for orthodontic diagnosis in children. J Clin Orthod 1983;17:180-90.
5. Riolo ML, Moyers RE, McNamara JA, Huter WS. An atlas of craniofacial growth. Ann Arbor, (Mich): Center for Human Growth and Development; 1974.
6. Krogman WM. Physical growth of Philadelphia white children, age 7-17 years. Philadelphia: Philadelphia Center for Research in Child Growth; 1965.
7. Rothstein T. Facial morphology and growth from 10-14 years of age in children presenting Class II, division 1 malocclusion: A comparative roentgenographic cephalometric study [dissertation]. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania; 1971.
8. Rothstein T. Facial morphology and growth from 10-14 years of age in children presenting class II, division 1 malocclusion: A comparative roentgenographic cephalometric study (abstract). Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1971;60:619-20.
9. Moorrees CFA. Normal variation and its bearing on the use of cephalometric radiographs in orthodontic diagnosis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1953;3:942-50.
10. Moorrees CFA, Kean MR. Natural head position, a basic consideration in the interpretation of cephalometric radiographs. Am J Phys Anthropol 1958;16:213-34.
11. Oktay H. The study of the maxillary sinus areas in different malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992;102:143-6.
12. Anderson DL, Popovich F. Lower cranial height vs craniofacial dimensions in Angle Class II malocclusion. Angle Orthod 1983; 53:253-60.
13. Bacon W, Eiller V, Hildwein M, Dubois G. The cranial base in subjects with dental and skeletal Class II. Eur J Orthod 1992;14:224-8.
14. Buschang PH, Tanguay R, Turkewicz J, Demirjian A, La Palme L. A polynomial approach to craniofacial growth: description and comparison of adolescent males with normal occlusion and those with untreated Class II malocclusion. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1986;90:437-42.
15. Ngan PW, Byczek E, Scheick J. Longitudinal evaluation of growth changes in Class II, Division 1 subjects. Semin Orthod 1997;3:222-31.
16. Gesch D. A longitudinal study on growth in untreated children with Angle Class II, Division 1 malocclusion. J Orofac Orthop 2000;61:20-33.
17. Chang H. Assessment of anteroposterior jaw relationship. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987;92:117-22.
18. Rosenblum R. Class II malocclusion: mandibular retrusion or maxillary protrusion. Angle Orthod 1995;65:49-62.