Computed tomography measurement of humeral head retroversion: Influence of patient positioning

Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery

Volumn 10, Issue 6, 2001, Pages 550-553

  Farrokh, D ^a,b   Fabeck, L ^a   Descamps, P Y ^a   Hardy, D ^a   Delince, Ph ^a  

^a SAINT PIERRE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

^b NONE   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTHROPLASTY; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BODY POSTURE; CADAVER; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMERUS; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; RADIOGRAPHY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SHOULDER; TOMOGRAPHY;

ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT; BIOMECHANICS; CADAVER; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMERUS; MALE; MIDDLE AGE; POSTURE; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SHOULDER JOINT; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 0035513444     PISSN: 10582746     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mse.2001.118412     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Bigliani LU, Weinstein DM, Glasgow MT, Pollock RG, Flatow EL. Glenohumeral arthroplasty for arthritis after instability surgery. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1995;4:87-94.
2. Boileau P, Walch G. The three-dimensional geometry of the proximal humerus. Implications for surgical technique and prosthetic design. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1997;79:857-65.
3. Cyprien JM, Vasey HM, Burdet A, Bonvin JC, Kritsikis N, Vuagnat P. Humeral head retroversion and glenohumeral relationship in the normal shoulder and in recurrent anterior dislocation (scapulometry). Clin Orthop 1983;175:8-17.
4. Doyle AJ, Burks RT. Comparison of humeral head retroversion with the humeral axis/biceps groove relationship: a study in live subjects and cadavers. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1998;7:453-7.
5. Friedman RJ. Humeral technique in total shoulder arthroplasly. Orthop Clin North Am 1998;29:393-402.
6. Hernigou PH, Duparc F, Filali Ch. Humerus retroversion and shoulder prosthesis [in French]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 1995;81:419-27.
7. Kronberg M, Broström A, Söderlund V. Retroversion of the humeral head in the normal shoulder and its relationship to the normal range of motion. Clin Orthop 1990;253:113-7.
8. Laumann U, Kramps HA. Computer tomography on recurrent shoulder dislocation. In: Bateman YE, Welsh RP, editors. Surgery of the shoulder. Philadelphia: Decker; 1984. p. 84-6.
9. Morrey BF, Chao EYS. Passive motion of the elbow joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1976;58:501-8.
10. Neer CS, Watson KC, Santon FJ. Recent experience in total shoulder replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1982;64:319-37.
11. Ovesen J, Nielsen S. Prosthesis position in shoulder arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Scand 1985;56:330-1.
12. Pearl ML, Volk AG. Retroversion of the proximal humerus in relationship to prosthetic replacement arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1995;4:286-9.
13. Randelli M, Gambrioli PL. Glenohumeral osteometry by computed tomography in normal and unstable shoulders. Clin Orthop 1986;208:151-6.
14. Roberts SNJ, Foley APJ, Swallow HM, Wallace WA, Coughlan DP. The geometry of the humeral head and the design of prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1991;73:647-50.
15. Söderlund V, Kronberg M, Broström A. Assessment of rotation in proximal humeral osteotomy. Acta Radiol 1994;35:287-90.
16. Söderlund V, Kronberg M, Broström A. Radiologic assessment of humeral head retroversion, description of a new method. Acta Radiol 1989;30:501-5.
17. Weiss APC, Adams M, Moore JR, Weiland AJ. Unconstrained shoulder arthroplasty, a five year average follow-up study. Clin Orthop 1990;257:86-90.