The role of information sources in watershed management

Fisheries

Volumn 26, Issue 11, 2001, Pages 16-23

  Wright, Angela S ^a   Shindler, Bruce ^a  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035511328     PISSN: 03632415     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1577/1548-8446(2001)026<0016:TROISI>2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Review

References (25)

1. Arcury, T. A. 1990. Environmental attitude and environmental knowledge. Human Organization 49:300-304.
2. Bischoff, J., A. Wright, J. Spencer, C. Davis, A. Whiting, S. Gries, T. Bucholz, and T. Dover. 2000. South Santiam watershed assessment. January 2000. E&S Environmental Chemistry, Inc., Corvallis, OR and the South Santiam Watershed Council, Tangent, OR.
3. Brunson, M. W., and B. S. Steel. 1994. National public attitudes toward federal rangeland management. Rangelands 16:77-81.
4. Dillman, D. A. 1978. Mail and telephone surveys: the total design method. John Wiley and Sons. Inc., New York.
5. Duram, L. A., and K. G. Brown. 1999. Assessing public participation in U. S. watershed planning initiatives. Society and Natural Resources 12:455-467.
6. Getches, D. H. 1996. Changing the river's course: western water policy reform. Environmental Law 26:157-174.
7. Griffin, C. B. 1999. Watershed councils: an emerging form of public participation in natural resource management. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 35:505-518.
8. Kenney, D. S. 1999. Historical and sociopolitical context of the western watershed movement. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 35:493-503.
9. Moore, S. A. 1996. The role of trust in social networks: formation, function and fragility. Pages 148-154 in D. A. Saunders, J. L. Craig, and E. M. Mattiske, eds. Nature conservation 4: the role of networks. Surrey Beatty and Sons, Chipping Norton, NSW, Australia.
10. Peters, R. G., V. T. Covello, and D. B. McCallum. 1997. The determinants of trust and credibility in environmental risk communication: an empirical study. Risk Analysis 17:43-54.
11. Preister, K., and J. A. Kent. 1997. Social ecology: a new pathway to watershed restoration. Pages 28-48 in J. E. Williams, C. A. Woods, and M. P. Dombeck, eds. Watershed restoration: principles and practices. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, MD.
12. Rhoades, B. L., D. Wilson, M. Urban, and E. E. Herricks. 1999. Interaction between scientists and nonscientists in community-based watershed management: emergence of the concept of stream naturalization. Environmental Management 25:297-308.
13. Riebsame, W. E. 1996. Ending the range wars? Environment 38:4-12.
14. Salant, P., and D. A. Dillman. 1994. How to conduct your own survey. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.
15. Shindler, B., K. A. Cheek, and G. H. Stankey. 1999. Monitoring and evaluating citizen-agency interactions: a framework developed for adaptive management. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-042. U. S. Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland.
16. Shindler, B., and M. Reed. 1996. Forest management in the Blue Mountains: public perspectives on prescribed fire and mechanical thinning. Department of Forest Resources, Oregon State University, Corvallis.
17. Shindler, B., B. S. Steel, and P. List. 1996. Public judgments of adaptive management: a response from forest communities. Journal of Forestry 94:4-12.
18. Smith, C. L., J. D. Gilden, J. S. Cone, and B. S. Steel. 1997. Contrasting views of coastal residents and coastal coho restoration planners. Fisheries 22(12):8-15.
19. Stankey, G. H., and B. Shindler. 1997. Adaptive management areas: achieving the promise, avoiding the peril. General Technical Report PNW-GTR-394. U. S. Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland.
20. State of Oregon. 1997. Coastal salmon restoration initiative. May 22, 1997. www.oregon-plan.org/Final.html. (Accessed 27 April 1998). Outreach Team for the Oregon Plan for Salmon and Watersheds and the Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board.
21. Steel, B. S., N. P. Lovrich, Jr., and J. C. Pierce. 1992-93. Trust in natural resource information sources and postmaterialist values: a comparative study of U.S. and Canadian citizens in the Great Lakes area. Journal of Environmental Systems 22:123-136.
22. Steger, M. A. E., J. C. Pierce, N. P. Lovrich, Jr., and B. S. Steel. 1988. Information source reliance and knowledge acquisition: Canadian/U.S. comparisons regarding acid rain. The Western Political Quarterly 41:747-764.
23. Stein, T. V., D. H. Anderson, and T. Kelly. 1999. Using stakeholders' values to apply ecosystem management in an upper Midwest landscape. Environmental Management 24:399-413.
24. Van Liere, K. D., and R. E. Dunlap. 1980. The social bases of environmental concern: a review of hypotheses, explanations, and empirical evidence. Public Opinion Quarterly 44:181-197.
25. Walesh, S. G. 1999. DAD is out, POP is in. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 35:535-544.