-
1
-
-
0000889821
-
-
R. Naik, C. Kota, J S. Payson, and G L. Dunifer, Phys. Rev. B48, 1008 (1993).
-
(1993)
Phys. Rev. B
, vol.48
, pp. 1008
-
-
Naik, R.1
Kota, C.2
Payson, J.S.3
Dunifer, G.L.4
-
2
-
-
0001321890
-
-
R. Jungblut, M T. Johnson, J. aan de Stegge, A. Reinders, and F J A. den Broeder, J. Appl. Phys.75, 6424 (1994).
-
(1994)
J. Appl. Phys.
, vol.75
, pp. 6424
-
-
Jungblut, R.1
Johnson, M.T.2
aan de Stegge, J.3
Reinders, A.4
den Broeder, F.J.A.5
-
4
-
-
0001315027
-
-
Phys. Rev. BM. Farle, B. Schulz, A N. Anisimov, W. Platow, and K. Baberschke, 55, 3708 (1997).
-
(1997)
Phys. Rev. B
, vol.55
, pp. 3708
-
-
Farle, M.1
Schulz, B.2
Anisimov, A.N.3
Platow, W.4
Baberschke, K.5
-
5
-
-
0344116159
-
-
G. Bochi, C A. Ballentine, H E. Inglefield, C V. Thompson, and R C. O’Handley, Phys. Rev. B53, R1729 (1996);
-
(1996)
Phys. Rev. B
, vol.53
, pp. R1729
-
-
Bochi, G.1
Ballentine, C.A.2
Inglefield, H.E.3
Thompson, C.V.4
O’Handley, R.C.5
-
6
-
-
0000411520
-
-
Phys. Rev. BG. Bochi, C A. Ballentine, H E. Inglefield, C V. Thompson, R C. O’Handley, H J. Hug, B. Stiefel, A. Moser, and H.-J. Guntherodt, 52, 7311 (1995).
-
(1995)
Phys. Rev. B
, vol.52
, pp. 7311
-
-
Bochi, G.1
Ballentine, C.A.2
Inglefield, H.E.3
Thompson, C.V.4
O’Handley, R.C.5
Hug, H.J.6
Stiefel, B.7
Moser, A.8
J, H.9
-
9
-
-
0000656053
-
-
J. Lee, G. Lauhoff, M. Tselepi, S. Hope, P. Rosenbusch, J A C. Bland, H A. Dürr, G. van der Laan, J. Ph. Schillé, and J A D. Matthew, Phys. Rev. B55, 15 103 (1997).
-
(1997)
Phys. Rev. B
, vol.55
, pp. 15 103
-
-
Lee, J.1
Lauhoff, G.2
Tselepi, M.3
Hope, S.4
Rosenbusch, P.5
Bland, J.A.C.6
Dürr, H.A.7
van der Laan, G.8
Ph, J.9
Matthew, J.A.D.10
-
10
-
-
0000995339
-
-
H J. Hug, B. Stiefel, A. Moser, I. Parashikov, A. Klicznik, D. Lipp, H.-J. Guntherodt, G. Bochi, D I. Paul, and R C. O’Handley, J. Appl. Phys.79, 5609 (1996);
-
(1996)
J. Appl. Phys.
, vol.79
, pp. 5609
-
-
Hug, H.J.1
Stiefel, B.2
Moser, A.3
Parashikov, I.4
Klicznik, A.5
Lipp, D.6
J, H.7
Bochi, G.8
Paul, D.I.9
O’Handley, R.C.10
-
11
-
-
0001408734
-
-
G. Bochi, H J. Hug, D I. Paul, B. Stiefel, A. Moser, I. Parashikov, H.-J. Guntherodt, and R C. O’Handley, Phys. Rev. Lett.75, 1839 (1995).
-
(1995)
Phys. Rev. Lett.
, vol.75
, pp. 1839
-
-
Bochi, G.1
Hug, H.J.2
Paul, D.I.3
Stiefel, B.4
Moser, A.5
Parashikov, I.6
J, H.7
O’Handley, R.C.8
-
15
-
-
0001041457
-
-
K. Ha, M. Ciria, R C. O’Handley, P W. Stephens, and S. Pagola, Phys. Rev. B60, 13 780 (1999).
-
(1999)
Phys. Rev. B
, vol.60
, pp. 13 780
-
-
Ha, K.1
Ciria, M.2
O’Handley, R.C.3
Stephens, P.W.4
Pagola, S.5
-
16
-
-
0001030356
-
-
M. Hehn, S. Padovani, K. Ounadejela, and J P. Bucher, Phys. Rev. B54, 3428 (1996).
-
(1996)
Phys. Rev. B
, vol.54
, pp. 3428
-
-
Hehn, M.1
Padovani, S.2
Ounadejela, K.3
Bucher, J.P.4
-
18
-
-
85038892972
-
-
A. Hubert and R. Schaffer, (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1998), Chap. 3
-
A. Hubert and R. Schaffer, Magnetic Domains (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1998), Chap. 3.
-
-
-
-
21
-
-
16344381943
-
-
U. Rudiger, J. Yu, L. Thomas, S S P. Parkin, and A D. Kent, Phys. Rev. B59, 11 914 (1999).
-
(1999)
Phys. Rev. B
, vol.59
, pp. 11 914
-
-
Rudiger, U.1
Yu, J.2
Thomas, L.3
Parkin, S.S.P.4
Kent, A.D.5
-
22
-
-
85038944668
-
-
Values of, and θ that minimize the free energy for a given film thickness were determined from a three-dimensional array of free energies (formula presented) calculated by varying, (1 nm steps), (0.001 steps in (formula presented)), and θ(0.5° steps)
-
Values of D, L, and θ that minimize the free energy for a given film thickness were determined from a three-dimensional array of free energies (formula presented) calculated by varying D (1 nm steps), L (0.001 steps in (formula presented)), and θ(0.5° steps).
-
-
-
-
23
-
-
85038970038
-
-
The uncertainties in the experimentally measured values of (formula presented) and (formula presented) give rise to less than a 5% variation in the domain size, while even a 30% uncertainty in, the least known parameter, would only result in a 10% change in the domain size, as determined from the minimization of the free energy
-
The uncertainties in the experimentally measured values of (formula presented) and (formula presented) give rise to less than a 5% variation in the domain size D, while even a 30% uncertainty in A, the least known parameter, would only result in a 10% change in the domain size D as determined from the minimization of the free energy.
-
-
-
|