Combining two approaches to efficiency assessment

Journal of the Operational Research Society

Volumn 52, Issue 11, 2001, Pages 1225-1231

  Tofallis, C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HERTFORDSHIRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Data envelopment analysis; Econometrics; Performance measurement; Regression; Statistics

Indexed keywords

CORRELATION METHODS; DECISION THEORY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS (DEA);

OPERATIONS RESEARCH;

EID: 0035506382     PISSN: 01605682     EISSN: 14769360     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601231     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Greene WH (1993). The econometric approach to efficiency analysis, In: Fried HO, Knox Lovell CA and Schmidt SS (eds). The Measurement of Productive Efficiency. Oxford University Press: Oxford, pp 68-119.
2. Simar L (1992). Estimating efficiencies from frontier models with panel data. J Prod Anal 3: 171-203.
3. Bessent A, Bessent W, Elam J and Clark T (1988). Efficiency frontier determination by constrained facet analysis. Opns Res 36: 785-796.
4. Torgersen AM, Forsund FR and Kittelsen SAC (1996). Slack- adjusted efficiency measures and ranking of efficient units. J Prod Anal 4: 379-398.
5. Lovell CAK and Eeckaut PV (1993). Frontier Tales: DEA and FDH. In: Diewert WE et al (eds.) Mathematical Modelling in Economics. Springer: Berlin, pp 446-457.
6. Hartman TE and Storbeck JE (1998). Managerial endorsement of data envelopment analysis. In: Neely AD and Waggoner DB (eds). Performance Measurement—Theory and Practice. Centre for Business Performance, Judge Institute. Cambridge Univer¬sity: Cambridge.
7. Thiry B and Tulkens H (1992). Allowing for inefficiency in parametric estimation of production functions for urban transit firms. J Prod Anal 3: 45-65.
8. Sengupta JK (1989). Data envelopment with maximum correla¬tion. Int JSyst Sci 20: 2085-2093.
9. Friedman L and Sinuany-Stern Z (1997). Scaling units via the canonical correlation analysis in the DEA context. Eur J Opl Res 100: 629-637.
10. Arnold VL, Bardhan IR, Cooper WW and Kumbhakar SC (1996). DEA and statistical regressions for efficiency evaluation and estimation. Ann Opns Res 66: 255-277.
11. Manly BFJ (1994). Multivariate Statistical Methods: A Primer, 2nd edn. Chapman and Hall: London.
12. Beasley JE (1990). Comparing university departments. Omega 18: 171-183.
13. Beasley JE (1995). Determining teaching and research efficien¬cies. J Opl Res Soc 46: 441-452.
14. Gittins R (1985). Canonical Analysis: A Review with Applica¬tions in Ecology. Springer-Verlag: Berlin.
15. Tabachnick BG and Fidell LS (1983). Using Multivariate Statistics. Harper and Row: New York
16. Charnes A, Cooper WW and Huang ZM (1990). Polyhedral cone-ratio DEA with an illustative application to commercial banks. J Econ 46: 73-91.
17. Allen R, Athanassopoulos A, Dyson RG and Thanassoulis E (1997). Weights restrictions and value judgements in data envelopment analysis. Ann Opns Res 73: 13-34.
18. Dyson RG, and Thanassoulis E (1988). Reducing weight flexibility in data envelopment analysis. J Opl Res Soc 39: 563-576.
19. Doyle J and Green R (1994). Efficiency and cross-efficiency in DEA: Derivations, meanings and uses. J Opl Res Soc 45: 567¬578.
20. Thanassoulis E. and Dyson RG (1992). Estimating preferred target input-output levels using DEA. Eur J Opl Res 56: 80-97.
21. Storbeck JE and Waring CG (2000). Model support for perfor¬mance-based budgeting. In: Neely A (ed.) Performance Measurement—Past, Present and Future. Centre for Business Performance, Cranfield School of Management, Cranfield University: Cranfield.
22. Tofallis C (1999). Model building with multiple dependent variables and constraints. The Statistician 48: 371-378.
23. Hayashi K and Panter AT (1994). Canonical correlation analysis with both equality and inequality constraints. Paper presented at the Joint Statistical Meetings of the American Statistical Asso¬ciation. (Available from author).
24. Yanai H and Takane Y (1992). Canonical correlation analysis with linear constraints. Linear Algebra Appl 176: 75-89.