|
Volumn 51, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 711-717
|
Neurocognitive outcome in brain metastases patients treated with accelerated-fractionation vs. accelerated-hyperfractionated radiotherapy: An analysis from Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Study 91-04
|
Author keywords
Brain metastasis; Mini Mental Status Examination; Radiation therapy
|
Indexed keywords
BRAIN;
COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY;
FRACTIONATION;
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;
PATIENT TREATMENT;
RADIOTHERAPY;
METASTASES;
ONCOLOGY;
ADULT;
AGED;
ARTICLE;
BRAIN METASTASIS;
CANCER CONTROL;
CANCER RADIOTHERAPY;
CANCER SURVIVAL;
COGNITION;
COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY;
FEMALE;
FOLLOW UP;
HUMAN;
INTERMETHOD COMPARISON;
MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY;
MALE;
MENTAL HEALTH;
MENTAL TEST;
NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
RADIATION DOSE;
RANDOMIZATION;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
AGED;
BRAIN NEOPLASMS;
COGNITION;
CRANIAL IRRADIATION;
DOSE FRACTIONATION;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
KARNOFSKY PERFORMANCE STATUS;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
QUESTIONNAIRES;
SURVIVAL ANALYSIS;
|
EID: 0035501212
PISSN: 03603016
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1016/S0360-3016(01)01676-5 Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (192)
|
References (19)
|