Benchmark exercise on expert judgment techniques in PSA Level 2

Nuclear Engineering and Design

Volumn 209, Issue 1-3, 2001, Pages 211-221

  Cojazzi, G ^a   Fogli, D ^a   Grassini, G ^a   De Gelder, P ^b   Gryffroy, D ^b   Bolado, R ^c   Hofer, E ^d   Virolainen, R ^e   Coe, I M ^f   Bassanelli, A ^g   Puga, J ^h   Papazoglou, I ⁱ   Zuchuat, O ^j   Cazzoli, E ^k   Eyink, J ^l   Guida, G ^m   Pinola, L ^a   Pulkkinen, U ^a   Simola, K ⁿ   Von Winterfeldt, D ^o   Valeri, A ^a   more..

^a JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE   (Italy)

^b Association Vincotte Nuclear   (Belgium)

^c UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^d GESELLSCHAFT FÜR ANLAGEN UND REAKTORSICHERHEIT GRS MBH   (Germany)

^e STUK RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY   (Finland)

^f NNC Ltd   (United Kingdom)

^g ENEL   (Italy)

^h Unidad Electrica SA ^*  (Spain)

ⁱ INSTITUTE OF NANOSCIENCE AND NANOTECHNOLOGY   (Greece)

^j Hauptabteilung fur die Sicherheit der Kernanlagen HSK   (Switzerland)

^k ERI Consulting and Co Grundstrasse 6   (Switzerland)

^l FRAMATOME ANP GMBH   (Germany)

^m UNIVERSITY OF BRESCIA   (Italy)

ⁿ VTT TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND   (Finland)

^o Decision Insights Inc   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PROBABILISTIC LOGICS; RELIABILITY THEORY;

PROBABILISTIC SAFETY ASSESSMENTS (PSA);

NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS;

EID: 0035499069     PISSN: 00295493     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0029-5493(01)00404-6     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. The European pressurised water reactor (EPR): An advanced PWR
2. Application of the CTN-UPM expert judgment methodology to an hydrogen DDT issue in a generic evolutionary PWR. Phase 2 of the benchmark exercise on expert judgment techniques in PSA level 2
3. The NNC expert judgment methodology and its use in the prediction of some results of the FARO L-24 test
4. A benchmark exercise on expert judgment techniques in PSA level 2: Design criteria and general framework
5. Benchmark exercise on expert judgment techniques in PSA level 2 (concerted action) BE-EJTs
6. Application of the KEEJAM expert judgment methodology to an hydrogen issue in a generic evolutionary PWR
7. Application of a formal expert judgment methodology to forecast results of a fuel-coolant interaction experiment
8. High pressure corium melt quenching tests in FARO
9. Lessons learnt from FARO/TERMOS corium melt quenching experiments
10. Scoring rules for continuous probability distributions
11. A formal expert judgment methodology and application to prediction of the results of a fuel coolant interaction experiment
12. Application of the VTT/STUK expert judgment methodology to a hydrogen issue in a generic evolutionary PWR
13. Prevention and mitigation of severe accidents