Design and preparation of a bulk magnet exhibiting an inverted hysteresis loop

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 64, Issue 13, 2001, Pages

  Ohkoshi, Shin ichi ^a   Hozumi, Toshiya ^a   Hashimoto, Kazuhito ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHROMIC ACID; GADOLINIUM; SAMARIUM;

ANISOTROPY; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; HYSTERESIS; MAGNET; MAGNETISM; MODEL;

EID: 0035494296     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.64.132404     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. J S. Miller and A J. Epstein, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl.33, 385 (1994).
2. O. Kahn, Molecular Magnetism (VCH, New York, 1993).
3. P. Day and A E. Underhill, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, Ser. A357, 2849 (1999).
4. S. Ohkoshi, T. Iyoda, A. Fujishima, and K. Hashimoto, Phys. Rev. B56, 11 642 (1997).
5. S. Ohkoshi and K. Hashimoto, Phys. Rev. B60, 12 820 (1999).
6. S. Ohkoshi, Y. Abe, A. Fujishima, and K. Hashimoto, Phys. Rev. Lett.82, 1285 (1999).
7. S. Ferlay, T. Mallah, R. Ouahés, P. Veillet, and M. Verdaguer, Nature (London)378, 701 (1995).
8. S M. Holmes and G S. Girolami, J. Am. Chem. Soc.121, 5593 (1999).
9. Ø. Hatlevik, W E. Bushmann, J. Zhang, J L. Manson, and J S. Miller, Adv. Mater.11, 914 (1999).
10. O. Sato, T. Iyoda, A. Fujishima, and K. Hashimoto, Science272, 704 (1996).
11. S. Ohkoshi and K. Hashimoto, J. Am. Chem. Soc.121, 10 591 (1999).
12. C A. Chang, Appl. Phys. Lett.57, 297 (1990).
13. N K. Flevaris and R. Krishnan, J. Magn. Magn. Mater.104–107, 1760 (1992).
14. K. Takanashi, H. Kurokawa, and H. Fujimori, Appl. Phys. Lett.63, 1585 (1993).
15. C. Gao and M J. O’Shea, J. Magn. Magn. Mater.127, 181 (1993).
16. J. Chen and J L. Erskine, Phys. Rev. Lett.68, 1212 (1992).
17. M C. dos Santos, J. Geshev, J E. Schmidt, S R. Teixeira, and L G. Pereira, Phys. Rev. B61, 1311 (2000).
18. The inverted hysteresis loops in the exchange-coupled multilayers such as the Co/Pt/Gd/Pt/films are explained by a combination between the antiferromagnetic coupling among the layers and the magnetic anisotropy acting on only the side layer (Refs. 12131415). Conversely, those in the heteroepitaxial Fe films on W(001) or Si(111) originate from the competition between the cubic and uniaxial magnetic anisotropy in the isolated Fe microcrystallines (Refs. 16 and 17).
19. P. Hansen, in Physics of Magnetic Garnets, Proceedings of the International School of Physics “Enrico Fermi,” Course LXX, Varenna, 1978, edited by A. Paoletti (Academic, London, 1978), p. 56.
20. The (formula presented) powders were prepared by reacting an aqueous solution containing mixtures of (formula presented) and (formula presented) with a (formula presented) aqueous solution at 55 °C to yield a light yellow precipitate. Elemental analyses for Sm, Gd, and Cr were obtained by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, e.g., Calculated for (formula presented) 9.3; Gd, 26.4; Cr, 11.9, and found: Sm, 9.4; Gd, 26.7; Cr, 12.1 Calculated for (formula presented) 18.2; Gd, 17.2; Cr, 12.0, and found: Sm, 18.7; Gd, 17.5; Cr, 12.8. Calculated for. (formula presented) 20.5; Gd, 14.9; Cr, 12.0, and found: Sm, 20.8; Gd, 14.5; Cr, 12.1.
21. W. Petter, V. Gramlich, and F. Hulliger, J. Solid State Chem.82, 161 (1989).
22. F. Hulliger, M. Landolt, and H. Vetsch, J. Solid State Chem.18, 283 (1976).