Using mathematical programming to solve large ranking problems

Journal of the Operational Research Society

Volumn 52, Issue 10, 2001, Pages 1144-1150

  Tse, A C B ^a  

^a CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Large ranking problem; Mathematical programming

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; DECISION THEORY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATHEMATICAL PROGRAMMING; PROBLEM SOLVING;

DECISION QUALITY; LARGE RANKING PROBLEM;

OPERATIONS RESEARCH;

EID: 0035493966     PISSN: 01605682     EISSN: 14769360     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601203     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Miller GA (1956). The magic number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol Rev 63: 81-97.
2. Newell A and Simon H (1972). Ratings of Professional Jour¬nals by Teachers of Management. Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
3. Driver MJ and Mock T (1975). Human information processing, decision style theory, and accounting information systems. Accounting Rev 50: 490-508.
4. Hwang MI and Lin JW (1999). Information dimension, infor¬mation overload and decision quality. JInform Sci 25: 213-218.
5. Baum A, Calesnick LE, Davis GE and Gatchel RJ (1982). Individual differences in coping with crowding: stimulus screening and social overload. J Personal Soc Psychol 43: 821-830.
6. Baum A and Paulus PB (1987). Crowding. In: Stolks D and Altman I (eds). Handbook of Environmental Psychology Wiley: New York, pp 533-570.
7. Schroder HM, Driver MJ and Streufert S (1967). Human Information Processing. Holt, Rinehart and Winston: New York.
8. Shields MD (1983). Effects of information supply and demand on judgment accuracy: evidence from corporate managers. Accounting Rev 58: 284-303.
9. Chewning E and Harrell A (1990). The effect of information load on decision makers’ cue utilization levels and decision quality in a financial distress decision task. Accounting, Organ Soc 15: 527-542.
10. Miller T and Dodge HR (1979). Ratings of professional journals by teachers of management. Improv Coll Univ Teach 27: 102¬103.
11. Coe KE and Weinstock I (1984). Evaluating the management journals: a second look. Acad Mngt J 27: 660-666.
12. Sharplin AD and Mabry RH (1985). The relative importance of journals used in management research. Hum Rel 38: 139-149.
13. Becker BW and Browne WG. (1979). Perceived quality of marketing journals. J Market Edu Nov: 6-15.
14. Becker BW and Browne WG. (1985). Perceived quality of marketing journals. Presented at the AMA Summer Educator’s Conference, August 1985, Washington DC, USA. (Available from author).
15. Ganesh GK, Chandy PR and Henderson GV (1990). Awareness and evaluation of selected marketing journals inside and outside discipline: an empirical study. Akron Bus Econ Rev 21: 93-106.
16. Heischmidt K and Gordon P (1993). Rating of marketing publications: impact of accreditation and publication history. J Edu Bus 68: 152-158.
17. Garfield E (1996). SCI Journal Citation Reports: A Bibliometric Analysis of Social Science Journals in the ISI Database. Institute for Scientific Information, Inc.: Philadelphia.
18. Hult GTM, Neese WT and Bashaw RE (1997). < http://garne- t2.acns.fsu.edu/-thult/Jme.htm >
19. Cabell D (1998). Cabell’s Directory of Publishing Opportu¬nities in Business and Economics. Cabell Publishing Co: Beaumont, TX.
20. Thurstone LL (1927). A law of comparative judgment. Psychol Rev 4: 273-286.