Contour interaction for an easily resolvable stimulus

Journal of the Optical Society of America A: Optics and Image Science, and Vision

Volumn 18, Issue 10, 2001, Pages 2414-2418

  Hess, Robert F ^a   Williams, Cristyn B ^a   Chaudhry, Asif ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ESTIMATION; MONTE CARLO METHODS;

CONTOUR INTERACTION;

COMPUTER VISION;

ARTICLE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; VISION; VISUAL ACUITY;

DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; VISUAL ACUITY; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0035490898     PISSN: 10847529     EISSN: 15208532     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1364/JOSAA.18.002414     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. M. C. Flom, G. Heath, and E. Takahashi, “Crowding inter-action and visual resolution: Contralateral effects,” Science 142, 979-980 (1963).
2. M. C. Flom, F. W. Weymouth, and D. Kahneman, “Visual resolution and contour interaction,” J. Opt. Soc. Am. 53, 1026-1032 (1963).
3. M. C. Flom, “Contour interaction and the crowding effect,” Probl. Optom. 3, 237-257 (1991).
4. W. K. Estes, D. H. Allmeyer, and S. M. Reder, “Serial position functions for letter identification at brief and extended exposure periods,” Percept. Psychophys. 19, 1-15 (1976).
5. A. J. Simmers, L. S. Gray, P. V. McGraw, and B. Winn, “Con-tour interaction for high and low contrast optotypes in normal and amblyopic observers,” Ophthalmic Physiol. Opt. 19, 253-260 (1999).
6. J. Wagner, “Experimentelle Beitrage zur Psychologie des lesens,” Z. Psychol. 80, 1-75 (1918).
7. H. Strasburger, L. O. Harvey, and I. Rentschler, “Contrast thresholds for the identification of numeric charters in direct and eccentric view,” Percept. Psychophys. 49, 495-508 (1991).
8. C. D. Gilbert and T. N. Wiesel, “Columnar specificity of intrinsic horizontal and corticocortical connections in cat visual cortex,” J. Neurosci. 9, 2432-2442 (1989).
9. D. Y. T’so and C. D. Gilbert, “The organization of chromatic and spatial interactions in the primate striate cortex,” J. Neurosci. 8, 1712-1727 (1988).
10. R. F. Hess, S. C. Dakin, and N. Kapoor, “Foveal contour interaction: Physics or physiology?” Vision Res. 20, 365-370 (2000).
11. D. H. Brainard, “The Psychophysics Toolbox,” Spatial Vision 10, 433-446 (1997).
12. J. Solomon and D. Pelli, “The visual filter mediating letter identification,” Nature (London) 369, 395-397 (1994).
13. S. T. L. Chung and G. E. Legge, “Spatial frequency dependence of letter recognition in central and peripheral vision,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. Suppl. 38, S639 (1997).
14. M. Palomares, C. LaPutt, and D. Pelli, “Crowding is unlike ordinary masking,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. Suppl. 40, S351 (1999).
15. D. Pelli and M. Palomares, “The role of feature detection in crowding,” Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. Suppl. 41, S37 (2000).