Magnetic resonance (MR) in endometrial carcinoma preoperative evaluation;Impiego della risonanza magnetica (RM) nella valutazione preoperatoria del carcinoma endometriale

Minerva Ginecologica

Volumn 53, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 341-346

  Wiesenfeld, U ^a   Cova, M ^a   De Lazslo, P ^a   Tinelli, A ^a   Mangino, F ^a   Grimaldi, E ^a   Guaschino, S ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Endometrial neoplasms, diagnosis; Lymphnodes; Magnetic resonance imaging

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; ENDOMETRIUM TUMOR; FEMALE; HUMAN; MIDDLE AGED; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ENDOMETRIAL NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 0035490418     PISSN: 00264784     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Creasman WT, Morrow CP, Bundy BN, Homesley HD, Graham JE, Heller PB. Surgical pathologic spread patterns of endometrial cancer. A Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. Cancer 1987;60(8 Suppl):2035-41.
2. Lampe B, Kurzl R, Hantschmann P. Prognostic factors that predict pelvic lymph node metastasis from endometrial carcinoma. Cancer 1994;74(9):2502-8.
3. Dore R, Moro G, D'Andrea F, La Fianza A, Franchi M, Bolis PF. CT evaluation of myometrium invasion in endometrial carcinoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1987;11(2):282-9.
4. Shipley CF 3d, Smith ST, Dennis EJ 3d, Nelson GH. Evaluation of pretreatment transvaginal ultrasonography in the management of patients with endometrial carcinoma. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1992;167(2):406-11; discussion 411-2.
5. Piver MS, Yazigi R, Blumenson L, Tsukada Y. A prospective trail comparing hysterectomy, hysterectomy plus vaginal radium and uterine radium plus hysterectomy in stage I endometrial carcinoma. Obstet Gynecol 1979;54(1):85-9.
6. Benedet JL, Bender H, Jones H 3rd, Ngan HY, Pecorelli S. FIGO staging classifications and clinical practice guidelines in the management of gynecologic cancers. FIGO Committee on Gynecologic Oncology. Int 3 Gynecol Obstet 2000;70(2):209-62.
7. Hricak H, Rubinstein LV, Gherman GM, Karstaedt N. MR imaging evaluation of endometrial carcinoma: results of an NCI cooperative study. Radiology 1991;179(3):829-32.
8. Scoutt LM, McCarthy SM, Lange R, Bourque A, Schwartz PE. MR evaluation of clinically suspected adnexal masses. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1994;18(4):609-18.
9. Saez F, Urresola A, Larena JA, Martin JI, Pijuan JI, Schneider J et al. Endometrial carcinoma: assessment of myometrial invasion with plain and gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12(3):460-6.
10. Lee EJ, Byun JY, Kim BS, Koong SE, Shinn KS. Staging of early endometrial carcinoma: assessment with T2-weighted and gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging. Radiographics 1999;19(4):937-45; discussion 946-7.
11. Takahashi S, Murakami T, Narumi Y, Kurachi H, Tsuda K, Kim T et al. Preoperative staging of endometrial carcinoma: diagnostic effect of T2-weighted fast spin-echo MR imaging. Radiology 1998;206(2):539-17.
12. Grasel RP, Outwater EK, Siegelman ES, Capuzzi D. Parker I., Hussain SM. Endometrial polyps: MR imaging features and distinction from endometrial carcinoma. Radiology 2000;214(1):47-52.
13. Reinhold C, Tafazoli F, Mehio A, Wang L., Atri M. Siegelman ES et al. Uterine adenomyosis: endovaginal US and MR imaging features with histopathologic correlation. Radiographics 1999:19(Spec No):S147-60.
14. Zarbo G, Caruso G, Caruso S, Mangano U, Zarbo R. Endometrial cancer: preopenitive evaluation of myometrial infiltration magnetic resonance imaging versus transvaginal ultrasonography. Eur J Gynecol Oncol 2000:21(1):95-7.
15. Hardesty LA, Sumkin JH, Nath ME, Edwards RP, Price FV. Chang TS et al. Use of preoperative MR imaging in the management of endometrial carcinoma: cost analysis. Radiology 2000:215(1):45-9.