Implications of sound levels generated by otologic devices

Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery

Volumn 125, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 361-363

  Michaelides, Elias M ^a   Kartush, Jack M ^b  

^a MICHIGAN EAR INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; INSTRUMENTATION; OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY; PRESSURE; SOUND;

OTOLARYNGOLOGY; PRESSURE; SOUND;

EID: 0035489973     PISSN: 01945998     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mhn.2001.118956     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Urquhart AC, McIntosh WA, Bodenstein NP. Drill-generated sensorineural hearing loss following mastoid surgery. Laryngoscope 1992;102:689-92.
2. Kylen P, Arlinger S. Drill-generated noise levels in ear surgery. Acta Otolaryngol 1976;82:402-9.
3. McGee TM, Kartush JM. Laser-stapes surgery. Laryngoscope 1990;100:106-8.
4. Antonelli PJ, Gianoli GJ, Lundy LB, et al. Early post-laser stapedotomy hearing thresholds. Am J Otolog 1998;19:443-6.
5. Hausler R, Schar PJ, Pratisto H, et al. Advantages and dangers of erbium laser application in stapedotomy. Acta Otolaryngol 1999;119:207-13.
6. Shah UK, Poe DS, Rebeiz EE, et al. Erbium laser in middle ear surgery: in vitro and in vivo animal study. Laryngoscope 1996; 106:418-22.
7. Berger EH, Wark WD, Morril JK, et al, eds. Noise and heading conservation manual. Fairfax, VA: American Industrial Hygiene Association; 1986. p. 46-7.
8. Kylen P, Stjernvall JE, Arlinger S. Variables affecting the drill-generated noise levels in ear surgery. Acta Otolaryngol 1977;84: 252-9.
9. Dobie RA. Medical-legal evaluation of hearing loss. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold; 1993. p. 138.