Are associative changes in acquisition and extinction negatively accelerated?

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 307-315

  Rescorla, Robert A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ANIMAL BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; CONDITIONING; FEMALE; LEARNING; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; PIGEONS AND DOVES; RAT; REINFORCEMENT; SPRAGUE DAWLEY RAT; TIME; VISION;

ANIMALS; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; COLUMBIDAE; CONDITIONING (PSYCHOLOGY); EXTINCTION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; FEMALE; MALE; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; TIME FACTORS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0035487001     PISSN: 00977403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0097-7403.27.4.307     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Anderson, J. R. (1978). Arguments concerning representations for mental imagery. Psychological Review, 83, 249-277.
2. Aydin, A., & Pearce, J. M. (1995). Summation in autoshaping with short-and long-duration stimuli. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48B, 215-234.
3. Bush, R. R., & Mosteller, F. (1951). A mathematical model for simple learning. Psychological Review, 58, 313-323.
4. Colwill, R. M., & Rescorla, R. A. (1985). Post-conditioning devaluation of a reinforcer affects instrumental responding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 11, 120-132.
5. Estes, W. K. (1950). Toward a statistical theory of learning. Psychological Review, 57, 94-107.
6. Hull, C. L. (1943). Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
7. Luce, R. D. (1959). Individual choice behavior. New York: Wiley.
8. Mackintosh, N. J. (1975). A theory of attention: Variations in the associatibility of stimuli with reinforcement. Psychological Review, 82, 276-298.
9. Mazur, J. E., & Hastie, R. (1978). Learning as accumulation: A reexamination of the learning curve. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 1256-1274.
10. O'Reilly, R. C., & Munakata, Y. (2000). Computational explorations in cognitive neuroscience: Understanding the mind by simulating the brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
11. Pearce, J. M. (1987). A model of stimulus generalization for Pavlovian conditioning. Psychological Review, 84, 61-73.
12. Rescorla, R. A. (2000). Associative changes in excitors and inhibitors differ when they are conditioned in compound. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 26, 428-438.
13. Rescorla, R. A. (2001). Unequal associative changes when excitors and neutral stimuli are conditioned in compound. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54B, 53-68.
14. Rescorla, R. A., & Coldwell, S. E. (1995). Summation in autoshaping. Animal Learning & Behavior, 23, 314-326.
15. Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II (pp. 64-99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
16. Restle, F., & Greeno, J. G. (1970). Introduction to mathematical psychology. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
17. Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, G. E. (1986). Learning internal representations by error propagation. In D. E. Rumelhart & J. L. McClelland (Eds.), Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition: Vol. 1. Foundations (pp. 110-149). Cambridge, MA: Bradford Books/MIT Press.