Postmodernism in marriage and family therapy training: Doctoral students' understanding and experiences

Journal of Marital and Family Therapy

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 527-533

  Wieling, Elizabeth ^a   Negretti, Michael A ^b   Stokes, Sean ^b   Kimball, Thomas ^b   Christensen, Faline Bateman ^b   Bryan, Laura ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION; FAMILY THERAPY; HUMAN; MARITAL THERAPY; PHILOSOPHY; QUESTIONNAIRE; STANDARD; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, GRADUATE; FAMILY THERAPY; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MARITAL THERAPY; PHILOSOPHY; QUESTIONNAIRES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0035486673     PISSN: 0194472X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1752-0606.2001.tb00345.x     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Anderson, H. (1997). Conversation, language, and possibilities: A postmodern approach to therapy. New York: Basic.
2. Becvar, D. S., & Becvar, R. J. (1996). Family therapy: A systemic integration (3rd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
3. Brown, R. H. (1994). Reconstructing social theory after the postmodern critique. In H. W. Simons & M. Billig (Eds.), After postmodernism (pp. 12-37). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
4. Constantine, L. (1989). Furniture for firewood: Blaming the systems paradigm. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 15, 111-114.
5. Efran, J. S., & Clarfield, L. E. (1992). Constructionist therapy: Sense and nonsense. In S. McNamee, & K. J. Gergen (Eds.), Therapy as social construction (pp. 200-217). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6. Freedman, J., & Combs, G. (1996). Narrative therapy. New York: Norton.
7. Gergen, K. J. (1985). The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American Psychologist, 40, 266-275.
8. Golann, S. (1987). On second-order family therapy. Family Process, 27, 51-64.
9. Hoffman, L. (1992). A reflexive stance for family therapy. In S. McNamee, & K. J. Gergen (Eds.), Therapy as social construction (pp. 7-24). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10. Larner, G. (1994). Para-modern family therapy: Deconstructing post-modernism. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy, 15, 11-16.
11. McFadyen, A. (1997). Rapprochement in sight? Postmodern family therapy and psychoanalysis. Journal of Family Therapy, 19, 241-262.
12. Minuchin, S. (1998). Where is the family in narrative family therapy? Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 24, 397-403.
13. Nichols, M. P., & Schwartz, R. C. (1998). Family therapy: Concepts and methods (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
14. Paré, D. A. (1995). Of families and other cultures: The shifting paradigm of family therapy. Family Process, 34, 1-19.
15. Rosenau, P. M. (1992). Post-modernism and the social sciences: Insights, inroads, and intrusions. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16. Spradley, J. (1980). Participant observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
17. Spradley, J. (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
18. Simons, H. W., & Billig, M. (1994). After postmodernism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.