Challenges family scholars may face in studying family diversity: A focus on Latino families, stepfamilies, and reproductive technology

Journal of Family Issues

Volumn 22, Issue 7, 2001, Pages 922-937

  Weaver, Shannon E ^c   Umaña Taylor, Adriana J ^a   Hans, Jason D ^b   Malia, Sarah E C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035486144     PISSN: 0192513X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/019251301022007007     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Ahrons, C. R., & Wallisch, L. (1987). Parenting in the binuclear family: Relationships between biological and step-parents. In K. Pasley & M. Ihinger-Tallman (Eds.), Remarriage and stepparenting: Current research and theory (pp. 225-256). New York: Guilford.
2. Amato, P. R. (2000). Diversity within single parent families. In D. H. Demo, K. R. Allen, & M. A. Fine (Eds.), Handbook of family diversity (pp. 149-172). New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Ambert, A. M. ( 1986). Being a stepparent: Live-in and visiting stepchildren. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 48, 795-804.
4. Antall, K. L. ( 1999). Who is my mother? Why states should ban posthumous reproduction by women. Health Matrix: Journal of Law-Medicine, 9, 203-234.
5. Baca Zinn, M., & Wells, B. (2000). Diversity within Latino families: New lessons for family social science. In D. H. Demo, K. R. Allen, & M. A. Fine (Eds.), Handbook of family diversity (pp. 252-273). New York: Oxford University Press.
6. Bumpass, L., Raley, R. K., & Sweet, J. ( 1995). The changing character of stepfamilies: Implications of cohabitation and nonmarital childbearing. Demography, 32, 425-436.
7. Carrasco, G. P. (1997). Latinos in the United States: Invitation and exile. In J. F. Perea (Ed.), Immigrants out (pp. 190-204). New York: New York University.
8. Casper, L. M., Cohen, P. N., & Simmons, T. ( 1999). How does POSSLQ measure up? Historical estimates of cohabitation (Population Working Paper No. 36). Washington, DC: Census Bureau.
9. Census Bureau. (1999). Unmarried-couple households by presence of children: 1960 to present. Washington, DC: Author.
10. Census Bureau. (2000). Projections of the resident population by race, Hispanic origin, and nativity: Middle series, 2050 to 2070. Washington, DC: Author.
11. Census Bureau. (2001 ). Resident population estimates of the United States by sex, race, and Hispanic origin: April 1, 1990 to July 1, 1999, with short-term projection to November 1, 2000. Washington, DC: Author.
12. Cherlin, A. J. (1992). Marriage, divorce, remarriage. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13. Cherlin, A. J., & Furstenberg, F. F. ( 1994). Stepfamilies in the United States: A reconsideration. Annual Review of Sociology, 20, 359-381.
14. Coleman, M., & Ganong, L. (1990). Remarriage and stepfamily research in the 80s: New interest in an old family form. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 925-940.
15. Coleman, M., & Ganong, L. ( 1997). Stepfamilies from the stepfamily's perspective. In I. Levin & M. Sussman (Eds.), Stepfamilies (pp. 107-122). New York: Haworth.
16. Coleman, M., Ganong, L. G., & Fine, M. A. (2000). Reinvestigating remarriage: Another decade of progress. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1288-1307.
17. Coleman, M., Ganong, L. H., & Weaver, S. E. (in press). Relationship maintenance and enhancement in remarried families. In J. H. Harvey & A. Wenzel (Eds.), Close relationships: Perspectives on maintenance and enhancement. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18. Coontz, S. (1999, November). The American family. Life, 22(12), 79-94.
19. Cornman, J. M., & Kingston, E. R. (1996). Trends, issues, perspectives, and values for the aging of the Baby Boom cohorts. Gerontologist, 36, 15-26.
20. Dube, J. (1999). Baby, oh baby: Nothing about 21st century offspring will be infantile. ABC2000 Millennium: Babies of the Future. Retrieved July 20, 2001. from the ABC News Web site: http://archive.abcnews.go.com/ABC2000/ABC2000living/babies2000. html
21. Farley, C. J. (1999, May 24). Latin music pops. Time, 153(20), 74-79.
22. Farrell, M. (2000, June). Concluding remarks. Presented at the Groves 2000 Conference on Marriage and the Family, Asheville, NC.
23. Ganong, L., & Coleman, M. (1994). Remarried family relationships. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24. Gibbons, A. (1993). The risks of inbreeding among humans. Science, 259, 1252.
25. Giles-Sims, J. (1984). The stepparent role: Expectations, behavior, and sanctions. Journal of Family Issues, 5, 116-130.
26. Golombok, S., Cook, R., Bish, A., & Murray, C. (1996). Families created by the new reproductive technologies: Quality of parenting and social emotional development of the children. Child Development, 66, 285-298.
27. Havins, W. E., & Dalessio, J. J. (1999). The ever-widening gap between the science of artificial reproductive technology and the laws which govern that technology. Depaul Law Review, 48, 825-866.
28. Katz, D. A. (1998). My egg, your sperm, whose preembryo? A proposal for deciding which party receives custody of frozen preembryos. Virginia Journal of Social Policy and Law, 5, 623-674.
29. Levin, I. (1997). The stepparent role from a gender perspective. In I. Levin & M. Sussman (Eds.), Stepfamilies (pp. 177-190). New York: Haworth.
30. MacDonald, W., & DeMaris, A. ( 1996). Parenting stepchildren and biological children: The effects of stepparent's gender and new biological children. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 5-25.
31. Mason, M. A., Fine, M. R., & Carnochan, S. (2001 ). Family law in the new millennium: For whose families? Journal of Family Issues, 22(7), 859-881.
32. Montgomery, M. J., Anderson, E. R., Hetherington, E. M., & Clingempeel, W. G. (1992). Patterns of courtship for remarriage: Implications for child adjustment and parent-child relationships. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 54, 686-698.
33. Nielsen, L. (1999). Stepmothers: Why so much stress? A review of the research. Journal of Divorce and Remarriage, 30, 115-148.
34. Nimkoff, M. F. (1951). Technology, biology, and the changing family. American Journal of Sociology, 57, 20-26.
35. Peters, J. F. ( 1999). Redefining Western families. Marriage and Family Review, 28, 55-66.
36. Peterson, G. W., & Steinmetz, S. K. (1999). Perspectives on families as we approach the twenty-first century: Challenges for future handbook authors. In M. Sussman, S. Steinmetz, & G. Peterson (Eds.), Handbook of marriage and the family (2nd ed., pp. 1-10). New York: Plenum.
37. Sabogal, F., Marín, G., & Otero-Sabogal, R. (1987). Hispanic familism and acculturation: What changes and what doesn't? Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 9, 397-412.
38. Scanzoni, J., & Marsiglio, W. (1991). Wider families as primary relationships. In T. Marciano & M. B. Sussman (Eds.), Wider families (pp. 117-133). New York: Haworth.
39. Schonfeld, E. M. (1998). "To be or not to be a parent?" The search for a solution to custody disputes over frozen embryos. Touro Law Review, 15, 305-326.
40. Seltzer, J. A. (2000). Families formed outside of marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 62, 1247-1268.
41. Settles, B. H. (1999). The future of families. In M. Sussman, S. Steinmetz, & G. Peterson (Eds.), Handbook of marriage and the family (2nd ed., pp. 143-175). New York: Plenum.
42. Shaw-Taylor, Y., & Benokraitis, N. V. (1995). The presentation of minorities in marriage and family textbooks. Teaching Sociology, 23, 122-135.
43. Sheinbach, D. M. (1999). Examining disputes over ownership rights to frozen embryos: Will prior consent documents survive if challenged by state law and/or constitutional principles? Catholic University Law Review, 48, 989-1027.
44. Shinagawa, L. H., & Jang, M. (1998). Atlas of American diversity. Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira.
45. Stacey, J. (1996). In the name of the family. Boston: Beacon.
46. Szinovacz, M. E. (1998). Grandparents today: A demographic profile. The Gerontologist, 38, 37-52.
47. Vega, W. A. (1990). Hispanic families in the 1980s: A decade of research. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 52, 1015-1024.
48. Walter, P. (1999). His, hers, or theirs - Custody, control, and contracts: Allocating decisional authority over frozen embryos. Seton Hall Law Review, 29, 937-969.