Coastal management using public judgments, importance scales, and predetermined schedule

Coastal Management

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 253-270

  Chuenpagdee, Ratana ^a   Knetsch, Jack L ^b   Brown, Thomas C ^c  

^a VIRGINIA INSTITUTE OF MARINE SCIENCE   (United States)

^b SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c ROCKY MOUNTAIN RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Coastal areas; Damage schedule; Importance scale; Paired comparison method; Resource losses

Indexed keywords

COASTAL ENGINEERING; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; KNOWLEDGE ACQUISITION; LAWS AND LEGISLATION;

RESOURCE USERS;

SCHEDULING;

COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT; DAMAGE; MARINE RESOURCE; PERCEPTION;

THAILAND;

EID: 0035481908     PISSN: 08920753     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/089207501750475091     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. The contingent valuation of safety and the safety of contingent valuation
2. Damage schedules for Thai coastal areas: An alternative approach to assessing environmental values
3. Environmental damage schedules: Community judgments of importance and assessments of losses
4. Issues, impacts, and implications of shrimp aquaculture in Thailand
5. Sealing the importance of environmental losses: Social values, damage assessment and the method of paired comparisons
6. Economic preferences or attitude expressions? An analysis of dollar responses and public issues
7. Environmental valuation: Some problems of wrong questions and misleading answers
8. Paired comparison and contingent valuation approaches to morbidity risk valuation
9. Evaluating impacts from noxious facilities: Including public preferences in current siting mechanisms
10. An assessment of the ecological and economic impact of mangrove conversion in Southeast Asia
11. Economic valuation by the method of paired comparison, with emphasis on tests of the transitivity axiom
12. Assessing environmental losses: Judgments of importance and damage schedules
13. Perception of risk
14. Assessing punitive damages (with notes on cognition and valuation in law)
15. Choices without prices without apologies