|
|
|
Volumn 67, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 261-292
|
|
What about my right to privacy? Where the Court went wrong in Ferguson v. City of Charleston.
a
a
NONE
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ADDICTION;
ARTICLE;
CONFIDENTIALITY;
CONGENITAL MALFORMATION;
FEMALE;
FERGUSON AND ROE V. CITY OF CHARLESTON;
FOURTH AMENDMENT;
GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;
HUMAN;
INFORMED CONSENT;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LAW ENFORCEMENT;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL ASPECT;
MANDATORY TESTING;
PREGNANCY;
PREGNANT WOMAN;
PRIVACY;
SUBSTANCE ABUSE;
TREATMENT REFUSAL;
UNITED STATES;
FERGUSON AND ROE V. CITY OF CHARLESTON;
FOURTH AMENDMENT;
GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;
LEGAL APPROACH;
ABNORMALITIES, DRUG-INDUCED;
CONFIDENTIALITY;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
INFORMED CONSENT;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LAW ENFORCEMENT;
MANDATORY TESTING;
PREGNANCY;
PREGNANT WOMEN;
PRIVACY;
SOUTH CAROLINA;
SUBSTANCE ABUSE DETECTION;
SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS;
SUPREME COURT DECISIONS;
TREATMENT REFUSAL;
UNITED STATES;
|
|
EID: 0035470650
PISSN: 00072362
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (1)
|
|
References (0)
|
