Making nature/marking humans: Laws as a site of (cultural) production

Annals of the Association of American Geographers

Volumn 91, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 487-503

  Delaney, David ^a  

^a AMHERST COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Animals; Bodies; Law; Nature; Wilderness

Indexed keywords

WILDERNESS AREA;

EID: 0035470499     PISSN: 00045608     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/0004-5608.00255     Document Type: Article

References (91)

1. Allen, A. 1990. Surrogacy, slavery, and the ownership of life. Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 13:139-61.
2. Anderson, K. 1998. Animals, science, and the spectacle of the city. In Animal geographies: Place, politics, and identity in the nature-culture borderlands, ed. J. Wolch and J. Emel, pp. 27-50. London: Verso.
3. Anderson, K. 2000. "The beast within": Race, nature, and animality. Environment and Planning D (Society and Space) 18:301-20.
4. Andrews, L. 1989. Alternative modes of reproducing. In Reproductive laws for the 1990s, ed. S. Cohen and N. Taub, pp. 361-403. Clifton, NJ: Humana Press.
5. Andrews, L. 1992. Torts and the double helix. Houston Law Review 29:149-213.
6. Arluke, A., and C. Sanders. 1996. Regarding animals. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
7. Blomley, N. 1994. Law, space, and geographies of power. New York: Guilford.
8. Braun, B., and N. Castree. 1998. Remaking reality: Nature at the millennium. London: Routledge.
9. Button, L. 1989. Postpartum psychosis: The birth of a new defense. Cooley Law Review 6:323-44.
10. Castree, N. 1995. The nature of produced nature: Materiality and knowledge construction in Marxism. Antipode 27:12-48.
11. Clark, G. L. 1985. Judges and the cities: Interpreting local autonomy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
12. Clark, J. 1989. Marx's inorganic body. Environmental Ethics 11:243-58.
13. Collingwood, R. 1945. The idea of nature. Oxford: Clarendon Press
14. Corea, G. 1985. The mother machine: Reproductive technologies from artificial insemination to artificial wombs. New York: Harper and Row.
15. Cronon, W. 1995. The trouble with wilderness: Or, getting back to the wrong nature. In Uncommon ground, ed. W. Cronon, pp. 69-90. New York: Norton.
16. Csordas, T. 1994. Introduction. In Embodiment and experience: The existential ground of culture and self, ed. T. Csordas, pp. 1-26. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
17. Dan-Cohen, M. 1992. Responsibility and the boundaries of the self. Harvard Law Review 105:959-1004.
18. Davis, K. 1997. Embody-ing theory: Beyond modernist and postmodernist readings of the body. In Embodied practices: Feminist perspectives on the body, ed. K. Davis, pp. 1-26. London: Sage.
19. Dekkers, M. 1994. Dearest pet: On bestiality. London: Verso.
20. Delaney, D. 1998. Race, place, and the law. Austin: University of Texas Press.
21. Delaney, D. 2000. Of minds and bodies and the legal-spatial constitution of sanctuary. Historical Geography 28:25-40.
22. Delaney, D., N. Blomley, and R. Ford. 2001. Where is law? In The legal geographies reader, ed. N. Blomley, D. Delaney, and R. Ford, pp. xiii-xxiii. Oxford: Blackwell.
23. Demeritt, D. 1994. The nature of metaphors in cultural geography and environmental history. Progress in Human Geography 18:163-85.
24. Demeritt, D. 1998. Science, social constructivism, and nature. In Remaking reality, ed. B. Braun and N. Castree, pp. 173-93. London: Routledge.
25. Denno, D. 1988. Human biology and criminal responsibility: Free will or free ride? University of Pennsylvania Law Review 137:615-71.
26. Dolgin, J. 1993. Just a gene: Judicial assumptions about parenthood. UCLA Law Review 40:637-94.
27. Duncan, N., ed. 1996. Body space: Destabilizing geographies of gender and sexuality. London: Routledge.
28. Engle, D. 1998. How does law matter in the constitution of legal consciousness? In How does law matter?, ed. B. Garth and A. Sarat, pp. 109-44. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
29. Faulstich, P. 1994. The cultured wild and the limits of wilderness. In A place of the wild, ed. D. Burks, pp. 161-74. Washington, DC: Island Press.
30. Floyd, J. 1990. The administration of psychotropic drugs to prisoners: State of the law and beyond. California Law Review 78:1243-85.
31. Ford, R. 1994. The boundaries of race: Political geography in legal analysis. Harvard Law Review 107:1841-921.
32. Foreman, D., and H. Wolke. 1989. The big outside. Tucson, AZ: Ned Ludd Books.
33. Francione, G. 1995. Animals, property, and the law. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
34. Francione, G. 1996. Rain without thunder. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
35. Franklin, S. 1997. Embodied progress: A cultural account of assisted conception. London: Routledge.
36. Gabel, P. 1980. Reification in legal reasoning. Research in Law and Society 3:25-52.
37. Gallegher, J. 1987. Eggs, embryos, and fetuses: Anxiety and the law. In Reproductive technologies: Gender, motherhood, and medicine, ed. M. Stansworth, pp. 139-50. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
38. Garber, M. 1996. Dog love. New York: Simon and Schuster.
39. Gelman, S. 1995. The biological alteration cases. William and Mary Law Review 36:1203-301.
40. Guthiel, T., and P. Applebaum. 1982. "Mind control," "synthetic sanity," "artificial competence," and general confusion: Legally relevant effects of antipsychotic medication. Hofstra Law Review 12:77-120.
41. Hacking, I. 1999. The social construction of what? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42. Halewood, P. 1996. Law's bodies: Disembodiment and the structure of liberal property rights. Iowa Law Review 81:1331-93.
43. Haraway, D. 1991. Simians, cyborgs, and women: The reinvention of nature. London: Routledge.
44. TM: Feminism and technoscience. New York: Routledge.
45. Hill, J. L. 1995. Mill, Freud, and Skinner: The concept of the self and the moral psychology of liberty. Seton Hall Law Review 26:92-182.
46. Hill, J. L. 1997. Law and the concept of the core self: Toward a reconciliation of naturalism and humanism. Marquette Law Review 80:289-390.
47. Horan, S. 1997. The XYY supermale and the criminal justice system: A square peg in a round hole. Loyola Los Angeles Law Review 25:1343-67.
48. Hyde, A. 1997. Bodies of law. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
49. Kevles, D. 1985. In the name of eugenics: Genetics and the uses of human heredity. New York: Knopf.
50. Knapp, C. 1998. A pack of two: The intricate connection between people and dogs. New York: Dial Press.
51. Kobayashi, A. 1990. Racism and law in Canada. Urban Geography 11:447-73.
52. Lease, G. 1995. Nature under fire. In Reinventing nature? Responses to postmodernism deconstruction, ed. M. Soule and G. Lease, pp. 3-16. Washington, DC: Island Press.
53. Leder, D. 1990. The absent body. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
54. Lelling, A. 1993. Eliminative materialism, neuroscience, and the criminal law. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 141:1471-564.
55. Liliquist, J. 1992. Peasants against nature: Crossing the boundaries between man and animals in 17th-and 18th-century Sweden. In Forbidden history, ed. J. Fout, pp. 57-88. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
56. Longhurst, R. 1997. (Dis)embodied geographies. Progress in Human Geography 21:486-50.
57. Marchant, C. 1989. The death of nature. San Francisco: Harper and Row.
58. Merry, S. 1990. Getting justice and getting even: Legal consciousness among working-class Americans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
59. Midgley, M. 1978. Beast and man: The roots of human nature. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
60. Midgley, M. 1984. Animals and why they matter. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
61. Mill, J. S. (1874) 1923. The utility of religion and theism. Reprint, London: Longmans Green.
62. Mitchell, D. 1997. The annihilation of space by law: The roots and implications of antihomelessness laws in the United States. Antipode 29:306-38.
63. Morriss, P. 1997. Blurred boundaries. Inquiry 40:259-290.
64. Nash, R. 1982. Wilderness and the American mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
65. Nast, H., and S. Pile. 1998. Places through the body. London: Routledge.
66. Oelschlaeger, M. 1991. The idea of wilderness from prehistory to the age of ecology. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
67. Ortner, S. 1974. Is female to male as nature is to culture? In Culture and society, ed. M. Rosaldo and L. Lamphere, pp. 67-96. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
68. Posner, R., and K. Silbaugh. 1996. A guide to America's sex laws. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
69. Proctor, J. 1998. The social construction of nature: Relativist accusations, pragmatist and critical realist responses. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 88:352-76.
70. Rosenberg, G. 1991. The hollow hope: Can courts bring about social change? Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
71. Sarat, A., and T. Kearns, eds. 1993. Law and everyday life. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
72. Schatzki, T., and W. Natter, eds. 1996. The social and political body. New York: Guilford Press.
73. Shanley, M. I., 1993. Surrogate mothers and women's freedom: A critique of contracts for human reproduction. Signs 18:618-39.
74. Singer, M. 1970. Psychological studies of punishment. California Law Review 58:405-62.
75. Smith, N. 1990. Uneven development: Nature, capital, and the production of space. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.
76. Smith, N. 1996. The production of nature. In Future natural: Nature, Science and Culture, ed. G. Robertson, M. Mash, L. Tickner, J. Bird, B. Curtis, and T. Putnam, pp. 35-54. New York: Routledge.
77. Smith, N. 1998. Nature at the millennium. In Remaking reality, ed. B. Braun and N. Castree, pp. 271-85. London: Routledge.
78. Soper, K. 1995. What is nature? Oxford: Blackwell.
79. Soule, M. 1995. The social siege of nature. In Reinventing nature? Responses to postmodern deconstruction, ed. M. Soule and G. Lease, pp. 137-70. Washington, DC: Island Press.
80. Strathern, M. 1992. Reproducing the future: Essays on anthropology, kinship, and the new reproductive technologies. London: Routledge.
81. Tuan, Y. 1984. Dominance and affection: The making of pets. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
82. Turner, J. 1994. The quality of wildness: Preservation, control, and freedom. In A place in the wild, ed. D. Burks, pp. 175-89. Washington, DC: Island Press.
83. Turner, T. 1994. Bodies and anti-bodies: Flesh and fetish in contemporary social theory. In Embodiment and experience, ed. T. Csordas, pp. 27-48. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
84. Tushnet, M. 1984. An essay on rights. Texas Law Review 62: 1363-403.
85. Wilderness Act of 1964. 1964. 16 U.S.C. sections 1131-36.
86. Willems-Braun, B. 1997. Buried epistemologies: The politics of nature in (post)colonial British Columbia. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 87:3-31.
87. Williams, P. 1987. Alchemical notes: Restructuring ideals from reconstructed rights. Harvard Civil Rights and Civil Liberties Law Review 24:401-33.
88. Wilson, E. 1975. Sociobiology: A new synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
89. Wolch, J., and J. Emel, eds. 1998. Animal geographies: Place, politics, and identity in the nature-culture borderlands. London: Verso.
90. Woliver, L. 1995. Reproductive technologies, surrogacy arrangements, and the politics of motherhood. In Mothers in law: Feminist theory and the legal regulation of motherhood, ed. M.A. Fineman and I. Karpin, pp. 346-59. New York: Columbia University Press.
91. Yanagisako, S., and C. Delaney, eds. 1995. Naturalizing power: Essays in feminist cultural analysis. London: Routledge.