|
Volumn 47, Issue 9, 2001, Pages 38-46
|
"Constant force technology" versus low-air-loss therapy in the treatment of pressure ulcers.
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ADULT;
AGED;
AIR;
ARTICLE;
BED;
CLASSIFICATION;
CLINICAL NURSING RESEARCH;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
COST CONTROL;
DECUBITUS;
ECONOMICS;
HOSPITALIZATION;
HUMAN;
INSTRUMENTATION;
METHODOLOGY;
MIDDLE AGED;
MULTICENTER STUDY;
NURSING;
PILOT STUDY;
PROSPECTIVE STUDY;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
SKIN CARE;
STANDARD;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
WOUND HEALING;
ADULT;
AGED;
AGED, 80 AND OVER;
AIR;
BEDS;
CLINICAL NURSING RESEARCH;
COST CONTROL;
COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS;
HUMANS;
MIDDLE AGED;
PILOT PROJECTS;
PRESSURE ULCER;
PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;
SKIN CARE;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
WOUND HEALING;
|
EID: 0035469240
PISSN: 08895899
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (20)
|
References (0)
|