The interests of egg donors: Who is deceiving whom?

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 1, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 20-21

  Cohen, Cynthia B ^a  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DONOR; FEMALE; GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; METHODOLOGY; MOTIVATION; OOCYTE DONATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RECUMBENCY; RISK;

GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;

ADULT; DECEPTION; DISCLOSURE; FEMALE; GUIDELINES; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MOTIVATION; OOCYTE DONATION; RESEARCH DESIGN; RISK; TISSUE DONORS;

EID: 0035468994     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/152651601317139261     Document Type: Note

References (9)

1. Barad, D., and B. Cohen. 1996. Ooccyte donation program at Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein. In New ways of making babies. The case of egg donation, ed. C. B. Cohen, 15-28. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
2. Cohen, C. B. 1996. Parents anonymous. In New ways of making babies. The case of egg donation, ed. C. B. Cohen, 88-105. Bloomington, Indiana University Press.
3. Cohen, C. B. 2000. Use of ª excessº human embryos for stem cell research: Protecting women’s rights and health. Women’s Health Issues 10(3): 121-126.
4. Gurmankin, A. D. 2001. Risk information provided to prospective oocyte donors in a preliminary phone call. American Journal of Bioethics 1(4): 3-13.
5. Kalfoglou, A. L. 2000. Looking back, looking forward: The legacy of the National Advisory Board on Ethics in Reproduction (NABER). Women’s Health Issues 10(3): 92-104.
6. Kalfoglou, A. L., and J. A. Gittelsohn. 2000. Qualitative follow-up study of women’s experiences with oocyte donation. Human Reproduction 15:798-805.
7. Klein, N. A., G. Sewall, and M. R. Soules. 1996. Donor oocyte program at University of Washington Medical Center. In New ways of making babies. The case of egg donation, ed. C. B. Cohen, 3-14. Bloomington, Indiana University Press.
8. National Advisory Board on Ethics in Reproduction (NABER). Report and recommendations on oocyte donation. In New ways of making babies. The case of egg donation, ed. C. B. Cohen, 231-320. Bloomington, Indiana University Press.
9. Schover, L. R., R. I. Collins, M. M. Quigley, J. Blankenstein, and G. Kanoti. 1991. Psychological follow-up of women evaluated as oocyte donors. Human Reproduction 6:1487-1491.