Restorative materials used on primary teeth: A comparative study between two European Universities: Nice and Amsterdam

Journal of Dentistry for Children

Volumn 68, Issue 5-6, 2001, Pages 339-343

  Farozi, Anne Marie ^a   Lupi Pegurier, Laurence ^a   Muller, Michèle ^a   Weerheijm, Karin L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CÔTE D'AZUR   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPOMER; GLASS IONOMER; RESIN;

ARTICLE; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DECIDUOUS TOOTH; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL SURGERY; FEMALE; FRANCE; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MULTICENTER STUDY; NETHERLANDS; PRESCHOOL CHILD; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS;

CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COMPOMERS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL CARIES; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DMF INDEX; FEMALE; FRANCE; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; NETHERLANDS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TOOTH, DECIDUOUS;

EID: 0035468130     PISSN: 15518949     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Marthaler, T.M.; O'Mullane, D.M.; Vrbic, V.: The prevalence of Dental Caries in Europe, 1990-1995. ORCA Saturday afternoon Symposium 1995. Caries Res, 30(4):237-255, 1996.
2. Burt, B.A.: Prevention policies in the light of the changed distribution of dental caries. Acta Odontol Scand, 56(3):179-186, June 1998.
3. Marks, L.A.; Weerheijm, K.L.; van Amerongen, W.E. et al: Dyract versus Tytin Class II restorations in primary molars: 36 months evaluation. Caries Res, 33:387-392, September-October 1999.
4. Quigley, G.A. and Hein, J.W. Comparative cleansing efficiency of manual and power brushing. J Amer Dent Assoc, 65:26-29.
5. Cahen, P.M.: Caries prevalence in 6- to 15-year-old French Children based on the 1987 and 1991 national surveys. J Dent Res, 72:1581-1587, December 1993.
6. Kalsbeek, H.; Eijkman, M.A.J.; Verrips, G.H. et al: Tandheelkundige hulp jeugdige verzekerden ziekenfondsverzekering (TJZ) een onderzoek naar mondgezondheid na effectuering van het besluit TJZ: eindmeting 1993. ISBN 90-6743-338-1 TNO/ACTA, 1994.
7. Ostlund, J.; Moller, K.; Koch, G.: Amalgam, composite resin, glass ionomer cement in Class II restorations in primary molars: a three year clinical evaluation. Swed Dent J, 16(3):81-86, 1992.
8. Kilpatrick, M. N.: Durability of restorations in primary molars. J Dent, 21:67-73, April 1993.
9. Qvist, V.; Laurberg, L.; Poulsen, A.; et al: Longevity and cariostatic effects on everyday conventional glass-ionomer and amalgam restorations in primary teeth: three-year results. J Dent Res, 76:1387-1396, July 1997.
10. Berg, J.H.: The continuum of restorative materials in pediatric dentistry - a review for the clinician. Pediatr Dent, 20:93-100, March-April 1998.
11. Friedl, K.H.; Hiller, K.A.; Schmalz, G.: Placement and replacement of composite restorations in Germany. Oper Dent, 20:34-38, January-February 1995.
12. Papathanasiou, A.G.; Curzon, M.E.; Fairpo, C.G.: The influence of restorative material on the survival rate of restorations in primary molars. Pediatr Dent, 16:282-288, July-August 1994.
13. Salama, F.S. and Tao, L.: Comparison of Gluma bond strength to primary vs. permanent teeth. Pediatr Dent, 13:163-166, May-June 1991.