|
Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 207-214
|
From the johns hopkins baby to baby miller: What have we learned from four decades of reflection on neonatal cases?
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
CANADA;
CHILD ADVOCACY;
CONGENITAL MALFORMATION;
COST OF ILLNESS;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
DECISION MAKING;
FEMALE;
HUMAN;
INFANT;
INFORMED CONSENT;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL ASPECT;
LONG TERM CARE;
MALE;
MEDICAL ETHICS;
MORALITY;
NEWBORN;
NEWBORN INTENSIVE CARE;
PARENT;
PARENTAL CONSENT;
PASSIVE EUTHANASIA;
PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;
PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE;
QUALITY OF LIFE;
STANDARD;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
TREATMENT REFUSAL;
TREATMENT WITHDRAWAL;
UNITED STATES;
DEATH AND EUTHANASIA;
LEGAL APPROACH;
PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;
ABNORMALITIES;
CANADA;
CHILD ADVOCACY;
COST OF ILLNESS;
DECISION MAKING;
ETHICS, CLINICAL;
EUTHANASIA, PASSIVE;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
INFANT;
INFANT, NEWBORN;
INTENSIVE CARE, NEONATAL;
LIFE SUPPORT CARE;
MALE;
MEDICAL FUTILITY;
MORALS;
PARENTAL CONSENT;
PARENTS;
PROFESSIONAL AUTONOMY;
QUALITY OF LIFE;
THIRD-PARTY CONSENT;
TREATMENT REFUSAL;
UNITED STATES;
WITHHOLDING TREATMENT;
|
EID: 0035467984
PISSN: 10467890
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (10)
|
References (17)
|