The effect of the addition of surface treated chopped and continuous poly (methyl methacrylate) fibres on some properties of acrylic resin

Journal of Oral Rehabilitation

Volumn 28, Issue 9, 2001, Pages 865-872

  Jagger, D ^a,c   Harrison, A ^a   Vowles, R ^a   Jagger, R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^b CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Acrylic resin; Denture bases; Fibres; Poly(methyl methacrylate) acrylic resin; Reinforcement; Self reinforcement

Indexed keywords

ACRYLIC ACID RESIN; BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; METHACRYLIC ACID METHYL ESTER;

ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; EVALUATION; HUMAN; SURFACE PROPERTY; TENSILE STRENGTH;

ACRYLIC RESINS; COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH; DENTAL MATERIALS; HUMANS; METHYLMETHACRYLATE; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 0035463388     PISSN: 0305182X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2001.00774.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. BERRONG, J.M., WEED, R.M. & YOUNG, J.M. (1990) Fracture resistance of Kevlar-reinforced poly (methyl methacrylate) resin: a preliminary study. International Journal of Prosthodontics, 3, 391.
2. BOWMAN, A.J. & MANLEY, T.R. (1984) The elimination of breakages in upper dentures by reinforcement with carbon fibre. British Dental Journal, 156, 87.
3. BRADEN, M., DAVY, K.W.M., PARKER, S., LADIZESKY, N.H. & WARD, I.M. (1988) Denture base poly (methyl methacrylate) reinforced with ultra-high modulus polyethylene fibres. British Dental Journal, 164, 109.
4. BRITISH STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR DENTURE BASE POLYMERS, BS 2487 (1989) British Standards Institution, London, UK.
5. BRITISH STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR ORTHODONTIC RESINS, BS 6747 (1987) British Standards Institution, London, UK.
6. CHOW, T.W. (1996) A study of the reinforcement of dental polymers with ultra high modulus polyethylene fibres. PhD Thesis, University of London, London.
7. DARBAR, U.R., HUGGETT, R. & HARRISON, A. (1994) Denture fracture. A survey. British Dental Journal, 176, 342.
8. GILBERT, J.L., NEY, D.S. & LAUTENSCHLAGER, E.P. (1995) Self reinforced composite poly (methyl methacrylate): static and fatigue properties. Biomaterials, 16, 1043.
9. GUTTERIDGE, D.L. (1988) The effect of including ultra-high-modulus polyethylene fibre on the impact strength of acrylic resin. British Dental Journal, 164, 177.
10. GUTTERIDGE, D.L. (1992) Reinforcement of poly (methyl methacrylate) with ultra-high-modulus polyethylene fibre. Journal of Dentistry, 20, 50.
11. INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ORGANISATION (ISO) 1567 (1988) Specifications for Denture Base Polymers. Geneva Switzerland.
12. JAGGER, D.C. & HARRISON, A. (1999) The effect of chopped poly (methyl methacrylate) fibres on some properties of acrylic resin denture base material. International Journal of Prosthodontics, 12, 542.
13. JAGGER, D.C., HARRISON, A. & JANDT, K. (1999) The reinforcement of dentures. A Review. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 26, 185.
14. LADIZESKY, N.H. & CHOW, T.W. (1992) Reinforcement of complete denture bases with continuous high performance polyethylene fibres. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 68, 934.
15. LADIZESKY, N.H., PANG, M.K.M., CHOW, T.W. & WARD, I.M. (1993) Acrylic resin reinforced with woven highly drawn linear polyethylene fibres. 3. Mechanical properties and further aspects of denture construction. Australian Dental Journal, 38, 28.
16. MUTLU, G., HARRISON, A. & HUGGETT, R. (1989) A history of denture base materials. Quintessence Dental Technology Yearbook, , 145.
17. POURDEYHIMI, B. & WAGNER, H.D. (1989) Elastic and ultimate properties of acrylic bone cement reinforced with ultra high molecular weight polyethylene fibres. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 23, 63.
18. RAMOS, V., RUNYAN, D.A. & CHRISTENSEN, L.C. (1996) The effect of plasma treated polyethylene fiber on the fracture strength of poly methylmethacrylate. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 76, 94.
19. RODFORD, R.A. (1990) Further development and evaluation of high-impact-strength denture base materials. Journal of Dentistry, 18, 151.
20. SKIRVIN, D.R., VERMILYEA, S.G. & BRADY, R.E. (1982) Poly (methyl methacrylate) reinforcement: effect on fatigue failure. Military Medicine, 147, 1037.
21. STAFFORD, G.D., BATES, J.F., HUGGETT, R. & HANDLEY, R.W. (1980) A review of the properties of some denture base polymers. Journal of Dentistry, 8, 292.
22. STIPHO, H.D. (1998) Effect of glass fiber reinforcement on some mechanical properties of autopolymerising poly methylmethacrylate. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry, 79, 580.
23. TANAKA, T., NAGATA, K., TAKEYAMA, M., ASUTA, M., NAKABAYASHI, N. & MASUHARA, E. (1981) 4 Meta opaque resin. A new resin strongly adhesive to nickel chromium alloy. Journal of Dental Research, 60, 1697.
24. VALLITTU, P.K. (1993) Comparison of two different silane compounds used for improving adhesion between fibres and acrylic denture base material. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 20, 533.
25. VALLITTU, P.K. (1998) The First Symposium on Fibre Reinforced Plastics in Dentistry. Symposium book of the European Prosthodontic Association, 22nd Annual Conference. Biomaterials Project. Institute of Dentistry, Finland.
26. VALLITTU, P.K. & LASSILA, V.P. (1992) Effect of metal strengthener's surface roughness on fracture resistance of acrylic denture base material. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation, 19, 385.