The Florida supreme court in the 2000 presidential election: Ambiguity, ideology, and signaling in a judicial hierarchy

PS - Political Science and Politics

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 645-650

  Brace, Paul ^a   Langer, Laura ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035458048     PISSN: 10490965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1049096501001019     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. Baum, Lawrence. 1997. The Puzzle of Judicial Behavior. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
2. Berry, William D., Evan J. Ringquist, Richard C. Fording, and Russell L. Hanson. 1998. "Measuring Citizen and Government Ideology in the American States, 1960-93" American Journal of Political Science 42:327-348.
3. Brace, Paul, and Melinda Gann Hall. 1995. "Studying Courts Comparatively: The View from the American States." Political Research Quarterly 48:5-29.
4. Brace, Paul, Laura Langer, and Melinda Gann Hall. 2000. "Measuring the Preferences of State Supreme Court Justices." Journal of Politics 62: 387-413.
5. _. 2001. "Placing Courts in State Politics." State Politics and Policy Quarterly 1(March):81-108.
6. Epstein, Lee, and Jack Knight. 1998. The Choices Justices Make. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
7. Gardner, James A. 1992. "The Failed Discourse on State Constitutionalism." Michigan Law Review 90:761-837.
8. Hall, Melinda Gann. 1990. "Opinion Assignment Procedures and Conference Practices in State Supreme Courts." Judicature 73:209-214.
9. _. 1992. "Electoral Politics and Strategic Voting in State Supreme Courts." Journal of Politics 54:427-46.
10. Johnson, Charles A., and Bradley C. Canon. 1984. Judicial Policies: Implementation and Impact. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
11. Kilwein, John C., and Richard A. Brisbin. 1997. "Policy Convergence in a Federal Judicial System: The Application of Intensified Scrutiny Doctrines by State Supreme Courts." American Journal of Political Science 41:122-48.
12. Langer, Laura. 2002. Judicial Review in State Supreme Courts: A Comparative Study. Albany: State University of New York Press, forthcoming.
13. Lutz, Donald S. 1994. "Toward a Theory of Constitutional Amendment." American Political Science Review 88:355-370.
14. Maltzman, Forrest, James F. Spriggs II, and Paul J. Wahlbeck. 1999. "Strategy and Judicial Choice: New Institutionalist Approaches to Supreme Court Decision-Making." In Supreme Court Decision-Making: New Institutionalist Approaches, ed. Cornell W. Clayton and Howard Gillman. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
15. _. 2000. Crafting Law on the Supreme Court: The Collegial Game. New York: Cambridge University Press.
16. Moore, David W. 2000. "Eight in Ten Americans to Accept Bush as 'Legitimate' President." 〈www. gallup.com/poll/releases/pr001214.2sp〉.
17. Murphy, Walter F. 1964. Elements of Judicial Strategy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18. Rogers, James R. 2001. "Information and Judicial Review: A Signaling Game of Legislative-Judicial Interaction." American Journal of Politics 45:84-99.
19. Schwartz, Edward P., Pablo T. Spiller, and Santiago Urbiztondo. 1994. "A Positive Theory of Legislative Intent." Law and Contemporary Problems 57:51-74.
20. Segal, Jeffrey A. 1997. "Separation-of-Powers Games in the Positive Theory of Congress and Courts." American Political Science Review 91: 28-44.
21. _. 1999. "Supreme Court Deference to Congress: An Examination of the Markist Model." In Supreme Court Decision-Making: New Institutionalist Approaches, ed. Cornell W. Clayton and Howard Gillman. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
22. _, and Harold J. Spaeth. 1993. The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Sheldon, Charles H. 1999. "The Incidence and Structure of Dissensus on a State Supreme Court." In Supreme Court Decision-Making: New Institutionalist Approaches, ed. Cornell W. Clayton and Howard Gillman. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
24. Songer, Donald R., Jeffrey A. Segal, and Charles M. Cameron. 1994. "The Hierarchy of Justice: Testing a Principal-Agent Model of Supreme Court-Circuit Interactions." American Journal of Political Science 38:673-96.
25. Sullivan, Andrew. 2000. "More Or Less," The New Republic, December.
26. Taylor, Stuart, Jr. 2000. "Why the Florida Recount Was Egregiously One-Sided." The National Journal December 23: 52-53.