Reference values versus consensus values: A reaction to the article of Baldan et al.

Accreditation and Quality Assurance

Volumn 6, Issue 9-10, 2001, Pages 442-443

  Visser, Robert George ^a  

^a Inst for Interlaboratory Studies   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Assigned value; Consensus value; Costs; Feasibility; Homogeneity study; Proficiency test; Reference value

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035457684     PISSN: 09491775     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s007690100371     Document Type: Review

References (8)

1. Baldan A, Van der Veen AMH, Prauss D, Recknagel A, Boley N, Evans S, Woods D (2001) Accred Qual Assur 6:164-167
2. Hässelbarth W, Fresenius J. Anal Chem (1999) 365:574-576
3. ISO/IEC Guide 43-1(1997) Proficiency testing by intercomparisons - Part 1 : Development and operation of proficiency testing schemes. International Organization for Standardization (ISO), Geneva
4. Squirrel A, Walker R (1998) Accred Qual Assur 3:165-168
5. Lamberty A, Van Nevel L, Moody JR, De Bièvre P (1996) Accred Qual Assur 1:71-82
6. Van Nevel L, Taylor PDP, Ornemark U, Moody JR, Heumann KG, De Bièvre P (1998) Accred Qual Assur 3:56-68
7. King B, Squirrell A, Walker R (1998) Accred Qual Assur 3:378-380
8. Hoogerbrugge R, Counotte GHM, Maas C, Maaskant JFN, Schothorst RC, Smeets OSNM, Spruit FJ (1996) Statistics and the assessment of interlaboratory studies. RIVM report 219101005, Bilthoven, The Netherlands