Nature and number of distinct phases in the random-field Ising model

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 64, Issue 9, 2001, Pages

  Sinova, Jairo ^a   Canright, Geoff ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; LOW TEMPERATURE PROCEDURES; MAGNETISM; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS;

EID: 0035449107     PISSN: 10980121     EISSN: 1550235X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.64.094402     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. For a recent review, see T. Nattermann, in Spin Glasses and Random Fields, edited by A. P. Young (World Scientific, Singapore, 1997).
2. H. Yoshizawa and D. P. Belanger, Phys. Rev. B 30, 5220 (1984).
3. C. Ro, G. S. Grest, C. M. Soukoulis, and K. Levin, Phys. Rev. B 31, 1682 (1985).
4. G. S. Grest, C. M. Soukoulis, and K. Levin, Phys. Rev. B 33, 7659 (1986);
5. Phys. Rev. BU. Nowak and K. D. Usadel, 44, 7426 (1991).
6. J. R. L. de Almeida and R. Bruinsma, Phys. Rev. B 35, 7267 (1987).
7. T. Schneider and E. Pytte, Phys. Rev. B 15, 1519 (1977).
8. M. Mezard and A. P. Young, Europhys. Lett. 18, 653 (1992).
9. M. Mezard and R. Monasson, Phys. Rev. B 50, 7199 (1994).
10. M. Guagnelli, E. Marinari, and G. Parisi, J. Phys. A 26, 5675 (1993);
11. J. Phys. AD. Luncaster, E. Marinari, and G. Parisi, 28, 4481 (1995).
12. E. Brézin and C. De Dominicis, Europhys. Lett. 44, 13 (1998);
13. E. BrézinC. De DominicisEur. Phys. J. B 19, 467 (2001).
14. S. Bastea and P. M. Duxbury, Phys. Rev. E 58, 4261 (1998).
15. Jairo Sinova, Geoff Canright, and A. H. MacDonald, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2609 (2000).
16. Jairo Sinova, Geoff Canright, Horacio E. Castillo, and A. H. MacDonald, Phys. Rev. B 63, 104427 (2001).
17. See, for example, Fig. 3 of M. Itakura, cond-mat/0012488 (unpublished), which shows the range in the phase diagram of several previous numerical studies.
18. A. Falicov, A. N. Berker, and S. R. McKay, Phys. Rev. B 51, 8266 (1995).
19. A. T. Ogielski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57, 1251 (1986).
20. A. K. Hartmann and U. Nowak, Eur. Phys. J. B 7, 105 (1999).
21. J.-C. Angès d’Auriac and N. Sourlas, Europhys. Lett. 39, 473 (1997).
22. M. R. Swift, A. J. Bray, A. Maritan, M. Cieplak, and J. R. Banavar, Europhys. Lett. 38, 273 (1997).
23. J. Machta, M. E. J. Newman, and L. B. Chayes, Phys. Rev. E 62, 8782 (2000).
24. H. Rieger, Phys. Rev. B 52, 6659 (1995);
25. H. Rieger and A. P. Young, J. Phys. A 26, 5279 (1993).
26. A. P. Young and M. Nauenberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 2429 (1985).
27. S. F. Edwards and P. W. Anderson, J. Phys. F: Met. Phys. 5, 965 (1975).
28. Analogous behavior occurs in superfluids. Here the quantity which “freezes” is a creation or annihilation operator, and the analog of our (Formula presented) is a one- (bosons) or two- (superconductors) particle density matrix. The signature of the freezing is again an extensive eigenvalue of the density matrix. See C. N. Yang, Rev. Mod. Phys. 34, 694 (1962).
29. D. A. Huse and D. S. Fisher, J. Phys. A 20, L997 (1987).
30. A. Aharony, Phys. Rev. B 18, 3318 (1978).
31. K. Hukushima and K. Nemoto, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 65, 1604 (1996);
32. K. Hukushima, Phys. Rev. E 61, R1008 (2000).
33. R. N. Bhatt and A. P. Young, Phys. Rev. B 37, 5606 (1985).
34. Helmut G. Katzgraber, Matteo Palassini, and A. P. Young, Phys. Rev. B 63, 184422 (2001).
35. G. Parisi, F. Ricci-Tersenghi, and J. J. Ruiz-Lorenzo, Phys. Rev. B 57, 13 617 (1998).
36. K. Hukushima, Phys. Rev. E 60, 3606 (1999).
37. A. Middleton (private communication).