Credibility of forensic DNA typing is driven by stringent quality standards

Accreditation and Quality Assurance

Volumn 6, Issue 9-10, 2001, Pages 409-414

  Kloosterman, A D ^a  

^a NETHERLANDS FORENSIC INSTITUTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Accreditation; Forensic DNA typing; Quality control; SGM plus; Standardization

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035438138     PISSN: 09491775     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s007690100372     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Sensabaugh GF (1981) Clin Haematol 10:185-207
2. Jeffreys AJ, Wilson V, Thein SL (1985) Nature 314:67-73
3. Jeffreys AJ, Wilson V, Thein SL (1985) Nature 316:76-79
4. Higuchi R, von Beroldingen CH, Sensabaugh GF, Ehrlich HA (1988) Nature 332:543-546
5. Edwards A, Civitello A, Hammond HA, Caskey CT (1991) Am J Hum Genet 49:746-756
6. Donelly P (1995) Genetica 96:55-67
7. The Evaluation of Forensic DNA Evidence (1996) National Research Council. National Academy Press, Washington D.C.
8. Lander ES, Budowle B (1994) Nature 371:735-738
9. Council of Europe (1992) Legal Affairs Recommendation No. R(92) 1 para. 45; Strasbourg
10. Gill P, Sparkes R, Fereday L, Werrett DJ (2000) Forensic Sci Int 108:1-29
11. Kloosterman AD (2001) Forensic Sci Int (submitted for publication)
12. DNA recommendations (1994) Int J Leg Med 107: 159-160
13. The Interpol DNA Monitoring Expert Group: http:/www.interpol.int/ Public/Forensic/dna/conference/ DNAProfiling01.asp
14. The EDNAP group: http:/www. unimainz.de/FB/Medizin/Rechtsmedizin/Remedneu/ednap/ ednap.htm
15. Accred Qual Assur (2001) 6:415-420