A methodological comparison of giving surveys: Indiana as a test case

Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 551-568

  Rooney, Patrick M ^a   Steinberg, Kathryn S ^a   Schervish, Paul G ^b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b BOSTON COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035438052     PISSN: 08997640     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0899764001303011     Document Type: Review

References (32)

1. American Association of Fundraising Counsel Trust for Philanthropy. (2000). Giving USA: The annual report on philanthropy for the year 1999. New York: Author.
2. Auten, G. E., Clotfelter, C. T., & Schmalbeck, R. L. (1997). Taxes and philanthropy among the wealthy (Working Paper). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan, Office of Tax Policy Research.
3. Blum, D. (1998). "Giving USA" revises donation figures downward to correct past flaws. The Chronicle of Philanthropy, 10(16), 30.
4. Bradley, R., Holden, S., & McClelland, R. (1999). A robust estimation of the effects of taxation on charitable contributions (Working Paper). Washington, DC: Bureau of Labor Statistics.
5. Community Foundation Silicon Valley. (1998). Giving back, the Silicon Valley way: The culture of giving and volunteerism in Silicon Valley. San Jose, CA: Author.
6. Council of Michigan Foundations, & Michigan Nonprofit Association. (2000). Michigan: Giving and volunteering: Key findings from a 1999 survey of Michigan residents. Grand Haven and East Lansing: Authors.
7. The dimensions of the US non-profit sector: A review symposium on the Nonprofit Almanac [Special issue]. (1993). Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 4(2).
8. The Donors Forum. (1999). South Florida gives: A comprehensive report on the state of philanthropy in Palm Beach, Broward, Miami-Dade, and Monroe Counties. Miami, Florida: Author.
9. Greater Kansas City Community Foundation and Affiliated Trusts. (1998). 1998 Report on Charitable Giving for Greater Kansas City. Kansas City, MO: Author.
10. Greene, E., Millar, B., & Moore, J. (1994). The Midwest's charitable advantage. The Chronicle of Philanthropy, 6(9), 22-26.
11. Hall, M. (2000). The measurement of charitable giving: Approaches employed in Canada's National Survey of Giving, Volunteering and Participating. Toronto, Canada: Canadian Centre for Philanthropy.
12. Hall, M., Knighton, T., Reed, P., Bussière, P., McRae, D., & Bowen, P. (1998). Caring Canadians, involved Canadians: Highlights from the 1997 National Survey of Giving, Volunteering and Participating. Ottawa: Statistics Canada.
13. Hall, M. H. (2001). Measurement issues in surveys of giving and volunteering and strategies applied in the design of Canada's National Survey of Giving, Volunteering and Participating. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30, 515-526.
14. Havens, J. J., & Schervish, P. G. (1997). Our daily bread: Findings from the first diary study on giving and receiving care. Chestnut Hill, MA: Boston College, Social Welfare Research Institute.
15. Havens, J. J., & Schervish, P. G. (2001). The methods and metrics of the Boston Area Diary Study. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30, 527-550.
16. Hodgkinson, V. A., & Weitzman, M. S. (1998). Responding to factual errors present in the Schervish and Havens article, "Embarking on a republic of benevolence? New survey findings on charitable giving," and other comments. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 27, 522-528.
17. Independent Sector. (1999). Giving and volunteering in the United States, 1999 edition. Washington, DC: Author.
18. Kirsch, A.D., McCormack, M. T., & Saxon-Harrold, S.K.E. (2001). Evaluation of differences in giving and volunteering data collected by in-home and telephone interviewing. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30, 495-504.
19. Kurre, J. A., & Andaleeb, S. S. (1998, November). Measuring philanthropy in a local area. Paper presented at the 27th Annual Conference of the Association for Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action, Seattle, WA.
20. Lipman, H. (1999). Report's numbers are no true measure of charity, critics say. The Chronicle of Philanthropy, 11(16), 27, 30.
21. National Center for Charitable Statistics. (2000). NCCS Relative Giving Effort Index: Comparing charitable giving by state. Washington, DC: Author.
22. O'Neill, M. (2001). Research on giving and volunteering: Methodological considerations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30, 505-514.
23. O'Neill, M., & Roberts, W. L. (2000). Giving and volunteering in California. San Francisco: University of San Francisco, Institute for Nonprofit Organization Management.
24. Raybin, N. L., & Kaplan, A. E. (1999). The key to better research on charitable giving: More financial support. The Chronicle of Philanthropy, 11(17), 53.
25. Ruddle, H., & Mulvihill, R. (1995). Reaching out: Charitable giving and volunteering in the Republic of Ireland: The 1994 survey. Dublin: National College of Ireland.
26. Ruddle, H., & Mulvihill, R. (1999). Reaching out: Charitable giving and volunteering in the Republic of Ireland: The 1997/98 surveys. Dublin: National College of Ireland.
27. Schervish, P. G., & Havens, J. J. (1998a). Embarking on a republic of benevolence? New survey findings on charitable giving. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 27, 237-242.
28. Schervish, P. G., & Havens, J. J. (1998b). Reply to Hodgkinson and Weitzman. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 27, 529-531.
29. Schervish, P. G., & Havens, J. J. (2001). Wealth and the commonwealth: New findings on wherewithal and philanthropy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30, 5-25.
30. Schuyt, T.N.M. (1999). Giving in the Netherlands 1999. Houten, the Netherlands: Bonn Stafleu Van Loghum.
31. Washington Regional Association of Grantmakers. (2000). A region of givers: The report on philanthropy in the greater Washington, DC region, 2000. Washington, DC: Author.
32. Wolpert, J. (1993). Patterns of generosity in America. New York: The Twentieth Century Fund Press.