Challenges in survey research and their implications for philanthropic studies research

Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 483-494

  Kennedy, John M ^a   Vargus, Brian ^b  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035438048     PISSN: 08997640     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0899764001303006     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. American Association for Public Opinion Research. (1999). Best practices for survey and public opinion research [Online]. Ann Arbor, MI: Author. Available: http://www.aapor.org/ethics/best.html
2. American Association for Public Opinion Research. (2000). Standard definitions [Online]. Ann Arbor, MI: Author. Available: http://www.aapor.org/ethics/stddef.html
3. Biemer, P., Groves, R., Lars L., Mathiowetz, M., & Sudman, S. (Eds.). (1991). Measurement errors in surveys. New York: John Wiley.
4. Brick, J. M., Waksberg, J., Kulp, D., & Starer, A. (1995). Bias in list-assisted telephone samples. Public Opinion Quarterly, 59, 218-235.
5. Dillman, D. (1978). Mail and telephone surveys: The total design method. New York: John Wiley.
6. Dillman, D. (2000). Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method. New York: John Wiley.
7. Groves, R. (1989). Survey errors and survey costs. New York: John Wiley.
8. Groves, R., & Couper, M. (1998). Nonresponse in household interview surveys. New York: John Wiley.
9. Guterbock, T., Meekins, B., Weaver, A., & Fries, J. (2000, May). Web versus paper: A mode experiment in a survey of university computing. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Portland, OR.
10. Harris Interactive. (2001, February). Our methodology for online research [Online]. Rochester, NY: Author. Available: http://www.harrisinteractive.com/about/methodology.asp
11. Keeter, S., Miller, C., & Kohut, A. (2000). Consequences, of reducing nonresponse in a national telephone survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64, 125-148.
12. Kennedy, J. M., Kuh, G. D., & Carini, R. (2000, May). Web and mail surveys: Preliminary results of comparisons based on a large-scale project. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Portland, OR.
13. Kindermann, C., Lynch, J., & Cantor, D. (1997, April), Effects of the redesign on victimization estimates [Online]. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. Available: http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/erve.pdf
14. Knowledge Networks. (2001, February). Science [Online]. Menlo Park, CA: Author. Available: http://www.knowledgenetworks.com/science/science.html
15. National Council on Public Polls. (2001, January 3). Presidential poll performance 2000 [Online]. Hackensack, NJ: Author. Available: http://www.ncpp.org/poll_perform.htm
16. Putnam, R. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
17. Singer, E., Van Hoewyk, J., & Maher, M. (2000). Experiments with incentives in telephone surveys. Public Opinion Quarterly, 64, 171-188.
18. Taylor, B. M., & Rand, M. (1995, August). The National Crime Victimization Survey redesign: New understandings of victimization dynamics and measurement. Paper presented at the meeting of American Sociological Association, Orlando, FL.
19. Turner, C., Ku, L., & Rogers. S. (1998). Adolescent sexual behavior, drug use, and violence: Increased reporting with computer survey technology. Science, 280, 867-873.
20. U.S. Census Bureau. (1978). The current population survey: Design and methodology (Technical Paper 40). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
21. Waksberg, J. (1978). Sampling methods for random digit dialing. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 73, 40-46.