Bracket Bond Strength with Transillumination of a Light-Activated Orthodontic Adhesive

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 71, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 307-311

  Oesterle, Larry J ^a,b   Shellhart, W Craig ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO SCHOOL OF DENTAL MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

Author keywords

Bonding; Brackets; Light cured; Transillumination

Indexed keywords

BISPHENOL A BIS(2 HYDROXYPROPYL) ETHER DIMETHACRYLATE; RESIN CEMENT; TRANSBOND;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; DENTAL BONDING; ENAMEL; HUMAN; INCISOR; LIGHT; MATERIALS TESTING; MAXILLA; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; RADIATION EXPOSURE; TENSILE STRENGTH;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL ENAMEL; HUMANS; INCISOR; LIGHT; MATERIALS TESTING; MAXILLA; ORTHODONTIC BRACKETS; RESIN CEMENTS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 0035434040     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Oesterle LJ, Messersmith ML, Devine SM, Ness CF. Light and setting times of visible-light-cured orthodontic adhesives. J Clin Orthod. 1995;29:31-36.
2. Wendt SL Jr, Covington JS. The use of light-cured composite resin to cement acid-etched fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 1986;55:578-582.
3. Andreason GF, Chan CF, Fahl J. Shear strength comparison of autopolymerizing and light-cured resins used for orthodontic bonding. Quintessence Int. 1984;15:1081-1086.
4. King L, Smith RT, Wendt SL, Behrents RG. Bond strengths of lingual orthodontic brackets bonded with light-cured composite resins cured by transillumination. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1987;91:312-315.
5. Jacoby H. Semi-indirect bonded lingual retainer. J Clin Orthod. 1989;23:171-175.
6. Behrents RG, Wendt SL, Fox DM, Smith RT, King L. A transillumination technique for lingual bonding. J Clin Orthod. 1987; 21:324-325.
7. Tavas MA, Watts DC. Bonding of orthodontic brackets by transillumination of a light activated composite: an in vitro study. Br J Orthod. 1979;6:207-208.
8. Cheng L, Ferguson JW, Jones P, Wilson HJ. An investigation of the polymerization of orthodontic adhesives by the transillumination of tooth tissues. Br J Orthod. 1989;16:183-188.
9. Oesterle LJ, Shellhart WC, Bellanger GK. The use of bovine enamel in bonding studies. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1998; 113:514-519.
10. Oliver RG. The effect of different methods of bracket removal on the amount of residual adhesive. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1988;93:196-200.
11. Lovell LG, Newman SM, Bowman SN. The effects of light intensity, temperature and comonomer composition on the polymerization behavior of dimethacrylate dental resins. J Dent Res. 1999;78:1469-1476.
12. Rueggeberg FA, Caughman WF, Curtis JW. Effect of light intensity and exposure duration on cure of resin composite. Operative Dent. 1994;19:26-32.
13. Miyazaki M, Oshida Y, Moore BK, Onose H. Effect of light exposure on fracture toughness and flexural strength of light-cured composites. Dent Mater. 1996;12:328-332.
14. Cacciafesta V, Sfondrini MF, Sfondrini G. A xenon arc light-curing unit for bonding and bleaching. J Clin Orthod. 2000;34:94-96.
15. Zach L, Cohen G. Pulp response to externally applied heat. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1965;19:515-530.
16. Pohto M, Scheinin A. Microscopic observations on living dental pulp. Acta Odontol Scand. 1958;16:303-327.
17. Lloyd CH, Joshi A, McGlynn F. Temperature rises produced by light sources and composites during curing. Dent Mater. 1986;2: 170-174.
18. Masutuni S, Setcos JC, Schneil RJ, Phillips RW. Temperature during polymerization of visible light activated resins. Dent Mater. 1988;4:174-178.
19. Hannig M, Bott B. In-vitro pulp chamber temperature rise during composite resin polymerization with various light-curing sources. Dent Mater. 1999;15:275-281.