Comparison of embryonic development in cleavage stage mouse embryo biopsy between acid Tyrode's solution and laser assisted technique

Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand

Volumn 84, Issue 8, 2001, Pages 1190-1198

  Phophong, Phakphum ^a   Doshi, Alpesh ^b   Harper, Joyce C ^c  

^a MAHIDOL UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Acid Tyrode's Solution; Blastocyst; Embryo Biopsy; Laser; Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis

Indexed keywords

DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; ISOTONIC SOLUTION; TYRODE'S SOLUTION;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOPSY; BLASTOCYST; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CRYOPRESERVATION; DRUG EFFECT; LASER SURGERY; METHODOLOGY; MOUSE; OOCYTE CLEAVAGE; PATHOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PRENATAL DEVELOPMENT; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; RADIATION EXPOSURE; RADIOGRAPHY; RANDOMIZATION; SAFETY; STANDARD; ZONA PELLUCIDA;

ANIMAL; BIOPSY; BLASTOCYST; CLEAVAGE STAGE, OVUM; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CRYOPRESERVATION; EMBRYO AND FETAL DEVELOPMENT; ISOTONIC SOLUTIONS; LASER SURGERY; MICE; PREIMPLANTATION DIAGNOSIS; RANDOM ALLOCATION; SAFETY; ZONA PELLUCIDA;

EID: 0035433829     PISSN: 01252208     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. Penketh R, McLaren A. Prospects for prenatal diagnosis during preimplantation human development. Bailliere's Clin Obstet Gynaecol 1987; 1: 747-64.
2. Lissens W, Sermon K, Staessen C, et al. Review: preimplantation diagnosis of inherited disease. J Inherit Metab Dis 1996; 19: 709-23.
3. Handyside AH, Delhanty JDA. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis; Strategies and surprises. Trends Genet 1997; 13: 270-5.
4. Delhanty JDA. Preimplantation diagnosis: Basic science and clinical practice. Cong Anom 1998; 38: 361-6.
5. ESHRE PGD. Consortium Steering Committee. ESHRE Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) Consortium: Preliminary assessment of data from January 1997 to September 1998. Hum Reprod 1999; 14: 3138-48.
6. Antinori S, Versaci C, Fuhrberg P, Panci C, Caffa B, Gholami GH. Seventeen live births after the use of an erbium-yytrium aluminium garnet laser in the treatment of male factor infertility. Hum Reprod 1994; 9: 1891-6.
7. Germond M, Nocera D, Senn A, Rink K, Delacretaz G, Fakan S. Microdissection of mouse and human zona pellucida using a 1.48 μm diode laser beam: Effeciency and safety of the procedure. Fertil Steril 1995; 64: 604-11.
8. Rink K, Delacretaz G, Salathe RP, et al. Non-contact microdrilling of mouse zona pellucida with an objective delivered 1.48 μm diode laser. Lasers Surg Med 1996; 18: 52-62.
9. Montag M, van der Van K, Delacretaz G, Rink K, van der Yen H. Laser-assisted microdissection of the zona pellucida facilitates polar body biopsy. Fertil Steril 1998; 69: 539-42.
10. Dokras A, Sargent IL, Ross C, Gardner RL, Barlow DH. Trophectoserm biopsy in human blastocysts. Hum Reprod 1990; 5: 821-5.
11. Carson SA, Gentry WL, Smith AL, Buster JE. Trophectoderm microbiopsy in murine blastocysts: Comparison of four methods. J Assit Reprod Genet 1993; 10: 427-33.
12. Veiga A, Sandalinas M, Benkhalifa M, et al. Laser blastocyst biopsy for preimplantation diagnosis in the human. Zygote 1997; 5; 351-4.
13. Dokras A, Sargent IL, Ross C, Gardner RL, Barlow DH. The human blastocyst: Morphology and human chorionic gonadotrophin secretion in vitro. Hum Reprod 1991; 6: 1143-51.
14. Dokras A, Sargent IL, Barlow DH. Human blastocyst grading: An indicator of developmental potential? Hum Reprod 1993; 8: 2119-27.
15. Depypere HT, Laybaert L. Intracellular pH changes during zona drilling. Fertil Steril 1994; 61: 319-23.
16. nd day after insemination for preimplantation diagnosis: Removal of a quarter of embryo retards cleavage. Fertil Steril 1992; 58: 970-6.
17. Garrisi GJ, Sapira V, Talansky BE, Navot D, Grunfeld L, Gordon JW. Clinical evaluation of three approaches to micromanipulation-assisted fertilization. Fertil Steril 1990; 54: 671-7.
18. Malter HE, Cohen J. Partial zona dissection of the human oocyte: A non-traumatic method using micromanipulation to assist zona pellucida penetration. Fertil Steril 1989; 51: 139-48.
19. Cui KH, Pannall P, Cates G, Matthews CD. Blood analysis of mice born following single-cell embryo biopsy. Hum Reprod 1993; 8: 1906-9.
20. Cui KH, Barua R, Matthews CD. Histopathological analysis of mice born following single cell embryo biopsy. Hum Reprod 1994; 9: 1146-52.
21. Viville S, Messaddeq N, Flori E, Gerlinger P. Preparing for preimplantation genetic diagnosis in France. Hum Reprod 1998; 13: 1022-9.
22. Rasmussen RE, Hammer-Wilson M, Berns MW. Mutation and sister chromatid exchange induction in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells by pulsed excimer laser radiation at 193 nm and 308 nm and continuous UV radiation at 254 nm. Photochem Photobiol 1989; 49: 413-8.
23. Tadir Y, Wright WH, Vafa O, Liaw LH, Asch R, Berns MW. Micromanipulation of gametes using laser microbeams. Hum Reprod 1991; 6: 1011-6.
24. Neev J, Gonzalez A, Licciardi F, et al. Opening of the mouse zona pellucida by laser without a micromanipulator. Hum Reprod 1993; 8: 939-44.
25. Feichtinger W, Strohmer H, Radner KM. Erbium YAG laser for micromanipulation of oocytes and spermatozoa. Lancet 1992; 340: 115-6.
26. Feichtinger W, Strohmer H, Fuhrberg P, et al. Photoablation of oocyte zona pellucida by erbiumYAG laser for in-vitro fertilisation in severe male infertility. Lancet 1992; 339: 811.
27. Germond M, Nocera D, Senn A, et al. Improved fertilization and implantation rates after non-touch zona pellucida microdrilling of mouse oocytes with a 1.48 μm diode laser beam. Hum Reprod 1996; 11: 1043-8.
28. Vestweber D, Gossler A, Boller K, Kemler R. Expression and distribution of cell adhesion molecule uvomorulin in mouse preimplantation embryos. Dev Biol 1987; 124: 451-6.
29. Larue JA, Ohsugi M, Hirchenhain J, Kemler R. E-cadherin null mutant embryos fail to form a trophectoderm epithelium. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1994; 91: 8263-7.
30. Reeve WJD. The distribution of ingested horseradish peroxidase in the 16-cell mouse embryo. J Embryol Exp Morph 1981; 66: 191-207.
31. Krzyminska UB, Lutjen J, O'Neill C. Assessment of the viability and pregnancy potential of mouse embryos biopsied at different preimplantation stages of development. Hum Reprod 1990; 5: 203-8.
32. Van Blerk M, Nijs M, Van Steirteghem AC. Decompaction and biopsy of late mouse morulae: Assessment of in-vitro and in-vivo developmental potential. Hum Reprod 1991; 6: 1298-304.
33. 2+ free medium have an effect on the survival of the preimplantation mouse embryo after biopsy? Hum Reprod Update 1996; 2: 257-61.
34. 2+ free medium on the biopsy proce dure for preimplantation genetic diagnosis and further development of human embryos. Hum Reprod 1998; 13: 2880-3.
35. Hoover L, Baker A, Chech JH, Lurie D, O' Shaughnessy A. Evaluation of a new embryo grading system to predict pregnancy rates following in vitro fertilization. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1995; 40: 151-7.
36. Hu Y, Maxson WS, Hoffman DI, et al. Maximizing pregnancy rates and limiting higher-order multiple conceptions by determinating the optimal member of embryos to transfer based on quality. Fertil Steril 1998; 69: 650-7.
37. Gardner DK, Lane M, Stevens J, Schlenker T, Schoolcraft WB. Blastocyst score affects implantation and pregnancy outcome: Towards a single blastocyst transfer. Fertil Steril 2000; 73: 1155-8.
38. Cohen J, Eisner C, Kort H, et al. Impairment of the hatching process following IVF in the human and improvement of implantation by assisting hatching using micromanipulation. Hum Reprod 1990; 5: 7-13.