Dentin bond strengths as a function of solvent and glutaraldehyde content

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 221-226

  Ritter, André V ^a,b   Bertoli, Cintia ^b   Swift Jr , Edward J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACETONE; ADHESIVE AGENT; ALCOHOL; CROSS LINKING REAGENT; DENTIN BONDING AGENT; GLUMA COMFORT BOND; GLUMA COMFORT BOND & DESENSITIZER; GLUMA DESENSITIZER; GLUMA ONE BOND; GLUTARALDEHYDE; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; RESIN CEMENT; SOLVENT;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CATTLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; MATERIALS TESTING; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; RANDOMIZATION; TENSILE STRENGTH;

ACETONE; ADHESIVES; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; CATTLE; CROSS-LINKING REAGENTS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; ETHANOL; GLUTARAL; MATERIALS TESTING; METHACRYLATES; RANDOM ALLOCATION; RESIN CEMENTS; SOLVENTS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 0035433803     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Swift EJ Jr, Perdigão J, Heymann HO. Bonding to enamel and dentin. A brief history and state of the art, 1995. Quintessence Int 1995; 26: 95-110.
2. Perdigão J, Lambrechts P, Van Meerbeek B, et al. The interaction of adhesive systems with human dentin. Am J Dent 1996; 9:167-173.
3. Eick JD, Gwinnett AJ, Pashley DH, et al. Current concepts on adhesion to dentin. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1997; 8: 306-335.
4. Van Meerbeek B, Perdigão J, Lambrechts P, et al. The clinical performance of adhesives. J Dent 1998; 26: 1-20.
5. Pashley DH. Dentin: A dynamic substrate - A review. Scan Mic 1989; 3: 161-176.
6. Pashley DH. Dentin bonding: Overview of the substrate with respect to adhesive material. J Esthet Dent 1991; 3: 46-50.
7. Davidson CL, de Gee AJ, Feilzer A. The competition between the composite-dentin bond strength and the polymerization contraction stresses. J Dent Res 1983; 63: 1396-1399.
8. Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Wei SHY. Micromorphological spectrum from overdrying to overwetting acid-conditioned dentin in water-free, acetone-based, single-bottle primer/adhesives. Dent Mater 1996; 12: 236-244.
9. Kato G, Nakabayashi N. The durability of adhesion to phosphoric acid etched, wet dentin substrates. Dent Mater 1998; 14: 347-352.
10. Stangel I, Ostro E, Domingue A, et al. Photoacoustic Fourer transform IR spectroscopy study of polymer-dentin interaction. In: Pireaux JJ, Bertrand P, Bredas JL. Polymer-solid interfaces. Bristol & Philadelphia:Institute of Physics Publishing, 1991; 157-167.
11. Di Renzo M, Ellis T, Domingue A, et al. Chemical reactions between dentin and bonding agents. J Adhes 1994; 74: 115-121.
12. Xu J, Stangel I, Butler IS, et al. An FT-Raman spectroscopic investigation of dentin and collagen surfaces modified by 2-hydroxyethylmethacrylate. J Dent Res 1997; 76: 596-601.
13. Fusayama T, Nakamura M, Kurosaki N, et al. Non-pressure adhesion of a new adhesive restorative resin. J Dent Res 1979; 58: 1364-1370.
14. Nakabayashi N, Kojima K, Masuhara E. The promotion of adhesion by the infiltration of monomers into tooth substrates. J Biomed Mat Res 1982; 16: 265-273.
15. Spencer P, Byerley TJ, Eick JD, et al. Chemical characterization of the dentin/adhesive interface by Fourier transform infrared photoacoustic spectroscopy. Dent Mater 1992; 8: 10-15.
16. Van Meerbeek B, Mohrbacher H, Celis JP, et al. Chemical characterization of the resin-dentin interface by micro-Raman spectroscopy. J Dent Res 1993; 72: 1423-1428.
17. Van Meerbeek B, Inokoshi S, Braem M, et al. Morphological aspects of the resin-dentin interdiffusion zone with different dentin adhesive systems. J Dent Res 1992; 71: 1530-1540.
18. Wakabayashi Y, Kondo Y, Suzuki K, et al. Effect of dissolution of collagen on adhesion to dentin. Int J Prosthodont 1994; 7: 302-306.
19. Inai N, Kanemura N, Tagami J, et al. Adhesion between collagen depleted dentin and dentin adhesives. Am J Dent 1998; 11: 123-127.
20. Pioch T, Kobaslija S, Schagen B, et al. Interfacial micromorphology and tensile bond strength of dentin bonding systems after NaOC1 treatment. J Adhes Dent 1999; 1: 135-142.
21. Nakabayashi N, Nakamura M, Yasuda N. Hybrid layer as a dentinbonding mechanism. J Esthet Dent 1991; 3: 133-138.
22. Gwinnett AJ, Kanca J. Micromorphology of the bonded dentin interface and its relationship to bond strength. Am J Dent 1991; 5: 73-77.
23. Kanca J. Resin bonding to wet substrate. I. Bonding to dentin. Quintessence Int 1992; 23: 39-41.
24. Kanca J. Wet bonding: Effect of drying time and distance. Am J Dent 1996; 9: 273-276.
25. Kanca J. Effect of resin primer solvents and surface wetness on resin composite bond strength to dentin. Am J Dent 1992; 5: 213-215.
26. Perdigão J, Ramos JC, Lambrechts P. In vitro interfacial relationship between human dentin and one-bottle dental adhesives. Dent Mater 1997; 13: 218-227.
27. Abdalla AI, Davidson CL. Bonding efficiency and interfacial morphology of one-bottle adhesives to contaminated dentin surfaces. Am J Dent 1998; 11: 281-285.
28. Fritz UB, Finger WJ. Bonding efficiency of single-bottle enamel/dentin adhesives. Am J Dent 1999; 12: 277-282.
29. Simionescu A, Simionescu D, Deac R. Lysine-enhanced glutaraldehyde crosslinking of collagenous biomaterials. J Biomed Mater Res 1991; 25: 1495-1505.
30. Ritter AV, Perdigão J, Swift Jr EJ, et al. Effect of phosphoric acid and Gluma Desensitizer on dentin. J Dent Res 1999; 78: 111 (Abstr 41).
31. Ritter AV, Heymann HO, Swift Jr EJ, et al. Effects of different rewetting techniques on dentin shear bond strengths. J Esthet Dent 2000; 12: 85-96.
32. Hansen EK, Asmussen E. Improved efficacy of dentin-bonding agents. Eur J Oral Sci 1997; 105: 434-439.
33. Dijkman GEHM, Jongebloed WL, de Vries J, et al. Closing of dentinal tubules by glutardialdehyde treatment, a scanning electron microscopy study. Scand J Dent Res 1994; 102: 144-150.
34. Triolo PT, Swift Jr EJ. Shear bond strengths of ten dentin adhesive systems. Dent Mater 1992; 8: 370.374.
35. Triolo PT, Swift Jr EJ, Barkmeier WW. Shear bond strengths of composite to dentin using six dental adhesive systems. Oper Dent 1995; 20: 46-50.
36. Fritz UB, Finger WJ, Uno S. Resin-modified glass ionomer cements: bonding to enamel and dentin. Dent Mater 1996; 12: 161-166.
37. Al-Salehi SK, Burke FJT. Methods used in dentin bonding tests: An analysis of 50 investigations on bond strength. Quintessence Int 1997; 28: 717-723.
38. Van Noort R, Noroozi S, Howard IC, et al. A critique of bond strength measurements, J Dent 1989; 17: 61-67.
39. Versluis A, Tantbirojn D, Douglas WH. Why do shear bond tests pull out dentin? J Dent Res 1997; 76: 1298-1307.
40. Fowler CS, Swartz ML, Moore BK, et al. Influence of selected variables on adhesion testing. Dent Mater 1992; 8: 265-269.
41. Cardoso PEC, Braga, RR, Carrilho MRO. Evaluation of micro-tensile, shear and tensile tests determining the bond strength of three adhesive systems. Dent Mater 1998; 14: 394-398.
42. Eliades G. Clinical relevance of the formulation and testing of dentine bonding systems. J Dent 1994; 22: 73-81.
43. Nakamichi I, Iwaku M, Fusayama T. Bovine teeth as possible substitutes in the adhesion test. J Dent Res 1983; 62: 1076-1081.
44. Schilke R, Baub O, Lisson JA, et al. Bovine dentin as a substitute for human dentin in shear bond strength measurements. Am J Dent 1999; 12: 92-96.
45. Pashley DH, Tao L, Boyd L, et al. Scanning electron microscopy of the substructure of smear layers in human dentine. Arch-Oral Biol 1988; 33: 265-270.
46. Balkenhol M. Gluma One Bond light curing dental adhesive-Technical script. Heraeus Kulzer Dental Division, Dormagen, Germany, 1998; 13-17.
47. Finger WJ, Balkenhol M. Practitioner variability effects on dentin bonding with an acetone-based one-bottle adhesive. J Adhesive Dent 1999; 4: 311-314.
48. Asmussen E, Munskgaard EC. Bonding of restorative resins to dentin by means of methacruloychloride and methacryloyl-R-isocyanate. Scand J Dent Res 1983; 91: 153-155.
49. Munksgaard EC, Asmussen E. Bond strength between dentin and restorative resins mediated by mixtures of HEMA and glutaraldehyde. J Dent Res 1984; 63: 1087-1089.
50. Felton DA, Bergenholtz G, Kanoy BE. Evaluation of the desensitizing effect of Gluma dentin bond on teeth prepared for complete coverage restorations. Int J Prosthodont 1991; 4: 292-298.
51. Dall'Orologio GD, Malferrari S. Desensitizing effects of Gluma and Gluma 2000 on hypersensitive dentin. Am J Dent 1993; 6: 283-286.
52. Bergenholtz G, Jontell M, Turtle A, et al. Inhibition of serum albumin flux across exposed dentine following conditioning with Gluma primer, glutaraldehyde or potassium oxalates. J Dent 1993; 21: 220-227.
53. Schüpbach P, Lutz F, Finger WJ. Closing of dentinal tubules by Gluma desensitizer. Eur J Oral Sci 1997; 105: 414-421.
54. Watanabe I, Takarada K, Nakabayashi N. Adhesion of 4-META/MMA-TBB resin to dentin pretreated with phosphoric acid. Japan J Dent Mater 1997; 10: 671-677.
55. Franzblau C, Faris B, Dunn-Lanchantin DM, et al. Cell growth on collagen-HEMA hydrogels. In: Nimni ME, Collagen, Vol III, Biotechnology. Boca Raton:CRC Press, 1988; 191-208.
56. Harashima I, Hirasawa T. Adsorption of 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate on dentin from aqueous solution. Dent Mater J 1990; 9: 36-46.
57. Nakabayashi N, Takarada K. Effect of HEMA on bonding to dentin. Dent Mater 1992; 8: 125-130.
58. Itoh K, Wakumoto S. Momentary pretreatment by 35% HEMA solution combined with five marketed bonding agents. Dent Mater J 1987; 6: 28-31.
59. Nakabayashi N, Watanabe A, Gendusa NJ. Dentin adhesion of "modified" 4-META/MMA-TBB resin: Function of HEMA. Dent Mater 1992; 8: 259-264.
60. Eliades GC, Caputo AA, Vougiouklakis GJ. Composition, wetting properties and ond strength with dentin of six new dentin adhesives. Dent Mater 1985; 1: 170-176.
61. Maciel KT, Carvalho RM, Ringle RD, et al. The effects of acetone, ethanol, HEMA, and air on the stiffness of human decalcified dentin matrix. J Dent Res 1996; 75: 1851-1858.
62. Emilson CG, Bergenholtz G. Antibacterial activity of dentinal bonding agents.Quintessence Int 1993; 24: 511-515.
63. Felton DA, Bergenholtz G, Cox CF. Inhibition of bacterial growth under composite restorations following GLUMA pretreatment. J Dent Res 1989; 68: 491-495.
64. Boonstra W, de Vries J, ten Bosch J, et al. Inhibition of bovine dentin demineralization by a glutardialdehyde pretreatment: an in vitro caries study. Scand J Dent Res 1993; 101: 72-77.
65. Arends J, Ogaard B, Ruben J, et al. Influence of glutardialdehyde on dentin demineralization in vitro and in vivo. Scand J Dent Res 1989; 97: 297-300.
66. Dijkman GE, de Vries J, Arenas J. Effect of glutardialdehyde on secondary caries in situ. Caries Res 1992; 26: 293-298.
67. Schweikl H, Schmalz G. Glutaraldehyde-containing dentin bonding agents are mutagens in mammalian cells in vitro. J Biomed Mater Res 1997; 36: 284-288.
68. Schweikl H, Schmalz G, Gottke C. Mutagenic activity of various dentine bonding agents. Biomaterials. 1996; 14: 1451-1456.
69. Hayakawa T, Kikutake K, Nemoto K. Efficacy of self-etching primers containing carboxylic acid monomers on the adhesion between composite resin and dentin. J Oral Sci 1998; 40: 9-16.
70. Hannig M, Reinhardt KJ, Bott B. Self-etching primer vs phosphoric acid: An alternative concept for composite-to-enamel bonding. Oper Dent 1999; 24: 172-180.
71. Milia E, Lallai MR, García-Godoy F. In vivo effect of a self-etching primer on dentin. Am J Dent 1999; 12: 167-171.