Sidebranch occlusion in direct intracoronary stenting: Predictors and results

Journal of Invasive Cardiology

Volumn 13, Issue 8, 2001, Pages 578-581

  Yilmaz, Hüseyin ^a   Demir, Ibrahim ^a   Belgi, Aytül ^a   Kabukçu, Mehmet ^a   Yalçinkaya, Selim ^a   Sancaktar, Oktay ^a  

^a AKDENIZ UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Coronary disease therapy; Percutaneous coronary intervention; Stent; Transluminal

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RISK ASSESSMENT; STENT; TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY;

ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CORONARY DISEASE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RISK ASSESSMENT; STENTS;

EID: 0035430446     PISSN: 10423931     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Meier B, Gruentzig AR, King SB III, et al. Risk of sidebranch occlusion during coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 1984;53:10-14.
2. Vetrovec GW, Cowely MJ, Wolfgang TC, Ducey KC. Effects of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty on lesion-associated branches. Am Heart J 1985;109:921-925.
3. Arora RR, Raymond RE, Dimas AP, et al. Sidebranch occlusion during coronary angioplasty: Incidence, angiographic characteristics and outcome. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1989;18:210-212.
4. Iniguez A, Macaya C, Alfonso F, et al. Early angiographic changes of sidebranches arising from a Palmaz-Schatz stented coronary segment: Results and clinical implications. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;23:911-915.
5. Mazur W, Grinstead C, Hakim AH, et al. Fate of sidebranches after intracoronary implantation of the Gianturco-Roubin Flex-stent for acute or threatened closure after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. Am J Cardiol 1994;74:1207-1210.
6. Pan M, Medina A, Suárez de Lezo J, et al. Follow-up patency of sidebranches covered by intracoronary Palmaz-Schatz stent. Am Heart J 1995;129:436-440.
7. Pentousis D, Guerrin Y, Funck F, et al. Direct stent implantation using the Multi-Link stent. Am J Cardiol 1998;82:1437-1440.
8. Figulla HR, Mudra H, Reifart N, Werner GS. Direct coronary stenting without predilatation: A new therapeutic approach with a special balloon catheter design. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 1998;43:245-252.
9. Serruys P, Jaegere P, Kiemeneij F, et al. A comparison of balloon expandable stent implantation with balloon angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 1994;331:489-495.
10. Fischman D, Leon M, Baim D, et al. A randomized comparison of coronary stent placement and balloon angioplasty in the treatment of coronary artery disease. N Engl J Med 1994;331:495-501.
11. Wilson SH, Berger PB, Mathew V, et al. Immediate and late outcome after direct stent implantation without balloon predilatation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;35:937-943.
12. Briguori C, Sheiban I, De Gregorio J, et al. Direct coronary stenting without predilatation. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;34:1910-1915.
13. Fischman DL, Savage MP, Leon MB, et al. Fate of lesion related sidebranches after coronary artery stenting. J Am Coll Cardiol 1993;22:1641-1646.
14. Darius A, Frank VT, Terry RB, et al. Incidence and predictors of sidebranch occlusion following high-pressure intracoronary stenting. Am J Cardiol 1997;80:994-997.
15. Iniguez A, Macaya C, Alfonso F, et al. Early angiographic changes of sidebranches arising from a Palmaz-Schatz stented coronary segment: Results and clinical implications. J Am Coll Cardiol 1994;23:911-915.