An innovative modification to structured controversy

Innovations in Education and Teaching International

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 251-256

  D'Eon, Marcel ^a   Proctor, Peggy ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SASKATCHEWAN   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035429876     PISSN: 14703297     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14703290110051398     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Bredehoft, D J (1991) Cooperative controversies in the classroom, College Teaching, 39, 3, 122-125.
2. Ediger, M (1996) Cooperative learning versus competition: which is better? Journal of Instructional Psychology, 23, 3, 204-209.
3. Green, C S and Klug, H G (1990) Teaching critical thinking and writing through debates: An experimental evaluation, Teaching Sociology, 18, 462-471.
4. Hammrich, P L and Blouch, K K (1998) A cooperative controversy lesson designed to reveal students' conceptions of the 'Nature of Science', The American Biology Teacher, 60, 1, 50-51.
5. Johnson, R, Brooker, C, Stutzman, J, Hultman, D and Johnson, D W (1985) The effect of controversy, concurrence seeking, and individualistic learning on achievement and attitude change, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 22, 3, 197-202.
6. Overby, L Y, Colon, G, Espinoza, D, Kinnunen, D, Shapiro, D and Learman, J (1996) Structured academic controversies in the professional Physical Education Classroom, Journal of Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance, 67, 8, 30-34.
7. Reynolds, B E (1999) Designing assessment activities to encourage productive collaboration, Cooperative Learning and College Teaching, 9, 2, 5-9.
8. Springer, L, Stanne, M E and Donovan, S S (1999) Effects of small-group learning on undergraduates in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology: a metaanalysis, Review of Educational Research, 69, 1, 21-51.