A comparison of scandinavian regulatory models: Issues and experience

Electricity Journal

Volumn 14, Issue 7, 2001, Pages 57-64

  Grønli, Helle ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035429791     PISSN: 10406190     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S1040-6190(01)00228-7     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. 1. The specific identity of the four regulators being discussed in this article, and their Web sites, are: the Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate (NVE), at http://www.nve.no; Finland's Electricity Market Authority, at http:// www.energiamarkkinavirasto.fi; the Swedish National Energy Administration, at http://www.stem.se, and the Danish Energy Agency, at http:// www.ens.dk. (Site addresses current as of July 20, 2001.)
2. 1. The specific identity of the four regulators being discussed in this article, and their Web sites, are: the Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate (NVE), at http://www.nve.no; Finland's Electricity Market Authority, at http:// www.energiamarkkinavirasto.fi; the Swedish National Energy Administration, at http://www.stem.se, and the Danish Energy Agency, at http:// www.ens.dk. (Site addresses current as of July 20, 2001.)
3. 1. The specific identity of the four regulators being discussed in this article, and their Web sites, are: the Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate (NVE), at http://www.nve.no; Finland's Electricity Market Authority, at http:// www.energiamarkkinavirasto.fi; the Swedish National Energy Administration, at http://www.stem.se, and the Danish Energy Agency, at http:// www.ens.dk. (Site addresses current as of July 20, 2001.)
4. 1. The specific identity of the four regulators being discussed in this article, and their Web sites, are: the Norwegian Water Resources and Energy Directorate (NVE), at http://www.nve.no; Finland's Electricity Market Authority, at http:// www.energiamarkkinavirasto.fi; the Swedish National Energy Administration, at http://www.stem.se, and the Danish Energy Agency, at http:// www.ens.dk. (Site addresses current as of July 20, 2001.)
5. 2. Sverre A.C. Kittelsen, Stepwise DEA. Choosing Variables for Measuring Technical Efficiency in Norwegian Electricity Distribution, Memorandum No. 6/93, Department of Economics, University of Oslo, 1993; and Abraham Charnes, William W. Cooper, and E. Rhodes, Measuring the Efficiency of Decision-Making Units, 2 Eero. J. of Operational Research, No. 6, 1978, at 429-44.
6. 3. Helle Grønli and B̊rd Olav Uthus, Effektivitet i incentivregulering, SINTEF Energy Research TR A5427, 2001 (available in Norwegian only).
7. 4. Helle Grønli, Ivar Wangensteen, Bård Olav Uthus, and Bernt Anders Hoff, Adjusting for Grid Expansions in Incentive-Based Regulation, presented at IAEE European Conference, Bergen, Norway, 2000.
8. 5. Joseph A. Schumpeter, Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy (5th ed., St. Leonards, Australia: Allen and Unwin, 1976), ch. 7.
9. 6. Three industrial customers, namely Outokumpu Finnmines Oy, Salmi Oy, and Patria Vammas Oy, and a local entrepreneur association, Vammalan Yrittäjätry requested an investigation of Megavoima Oy in 1996 and 1999.
10. 7. P. Koronen, M. Syrjänen, and M. Tötterström, Summary: Assessment of Coast Efficiency in Finnish Electricity Distribution Using DEA, memo from the Quantitive Methods Unit, Helsinki School of Economics and Business Administration, Nov. 2000.
11. 8. Knut Samdal, Dag Erik Nordgård, Olve Mogstad, Gerd Kjølle, and Stig Fretheim, Quality-Adjusted Revenue Caps: Data Management adn Practical Solutions, presented at DistribuTECH Europe 2000, Vienna 2000.