Mandatory reporting of domestic violence injuries to the police: What do emergency department patients think?

JAMA

Volumn 286, Issue 5, 2001, Pages 580-583

  Rodríguez, Michael A ^a   McLoughlin, Elizabeth ^b   Nah, Gregory ^b   Campbell, Jacquelyn C ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Trauma Foundation   (United States)

^c JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF NURSING   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMERGENCY WARD; FAMILY VIOLENCE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; JURISPRUDENCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PATIENT ATTITUDE; POLICE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; SEXUAL ABUSE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 0035413710     PISSN: 00987484     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jama.286.5.580     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Laws mandating reporting of domestic violence: Do they promote patient well-being?
2. Patient attitudes about mandatory reporting of domestic violence: Implications for health care professionals
3. In favor of mandatory reporting
4. Women's opinions about domestic violence screening and mandatory reporting
5. Mandatory reporting of intimate partner violence to police: Views of physicians in California
6. A population-based survey assessing support for mandatory domestic violence reporting by healthcare personnel
7. Domestic violence victims support mandatory reporting: For others
8. Mandatory reporting laws do not deter patients from seeking medical care
9. An evaluation of a system change training model to improve emergency department reponse to battered women
10. Prevalence of intimate partner abuse in women treated at community hospital emergency departments
11. The Abuse Assessment Screen: A clinical instrument to measure frequency, severity and perpetrator of abuse against women
12. Barriers to health care for abused Latina and Asian immigrant women