Self-initiated status transfer: A theory of status gain and status loss

Small Group Research

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 406-425

  De Kelaita, Robert ^a   Munroe, Paul T ^b   Tootell, Geoffrey ^a  

^a SAN JOSE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TOWSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035413490     PISSN: 10464964     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/104649640103200402     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Berger, J., Cohen, B. P., & Zelditch, M., Jr. (1972, June). Status characteristics and social interaction. American Sociological Review, 37, 241-255.
2. Berger, J., Fisek, M. H., & Norman, R. Z. (1989). The evolution of status expectations: A theoretical extension. In J. Berger, M. Zelditch, Jr., & B. Anderson (Eds.), Sociological theories in progress: New formulations (pp. 100-130). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3. Berger, J., Fisek, M. H., Norman, R. Z., & Zelditch, M., Jr. (1977). Status characteristics and social interaction: An expectation states approach. New York: Elsevier.
4. Berger, J., Webster, M., Jr., Ridgeway, C., & Rosenholtz, S. J. (1986). Status cues, expectations, and behavior. In E. J. Lawler (Ed.), Advances in group processes. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
5. Driskell, J. E., Olmstead, B., & Salas, E. (1993). Task cues, dominance cues, and influence in task groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 51-60.
6. Granovetter, M. (1973). The importance of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.
7. Humphreys, P., & Berger, J. (1981). Theoretical consequences of status characteristics formulation. American Journal of Sociology, 86, 953-983.
8. Mohr, P. B. (1986). Demeanor, status cue, or performance? Social Psychology Quarterly, 49, 228-236.
9. Moore, J. C., Jr. (1985). Role enactment and self identity: An expectation states approach. In J. Berger & M. Zelditch, Jr. (Eds.), Status, rewards, and influence: How expectations organize behavior. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
10. Munroe, P. T., Tootell, G., & Kuhn, T. S. (1995). Agreement as a function of initial choice and stay response probabilities in status characteristics research. Small Group Research, 26, 427-441.
11. Nelson-Kilger, M. (1992, August). Status gains and status losses. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, CA.
12. Ridgeway, C. L., & Berger, J. (1988). The legitimation of power and prestige orders in task groups. In M. Webster, Jr., & M. Foschi (Eds.), Status generalization: New theory and research (pp. 207-231). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
13. Ridgeway, C. L., & Diekema, D. (1989). Dominance and collective hierarchy formation in male and female task groups. American Sociological Review, 54, 79-93.
14. Troyer, L., & Younts, C. W. (1997). Whose expectations matter? The relative power of first-and second-order expectations in determining social influence. American Journal of Sociology, 103(3), 692-732.
15. Wagner, D. G., & Berger, J. (1993). Status characteristics theory: The growth of a program. In J. Berger & M. Zelditch, Jr. (Eds.), Theoretical research programs: Studies in the growth of theory (pp. 23-63). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
16. Webster, M., Jr., & Driskell, J. E. (1978). Status generalization: A review and some new data. American Sociological Review, 43, 220-236.
17. Webster, M., Jr., & Foschi, M. (1988). Overview of status generalization. In M. Webster, Jr., & M. Foschi (Eds.), Status generalization: New theory and research. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
18. Webster, M., Jr., & Sobieszek, B. (1974). Sources of evaluation: A formal theory of significant others and social influence. New York: Wiley & Sons.
19. Webster, M., Jr., & Whitmeyer, J. M. (1999). A theory of second-order expectations and behavior. Social Psychology Quarterly, 62(1), 17-31.
20. Yamagishi, T., Gillmore, M. R., & Cook, K. S.(1988). Network connections and the distribution of power in exchange networks. American Journal of Sociology, 93, 833-851.