Accuracy of Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose: Impact on Diabetes Management Decisions During Pregnancy

The Diabetes Educator

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 521-529

  Henry, M Joann ^a   Major, Carol A ^a   Reinsch, Sibylle ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BLOOD; BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY DIABETES MELLITUS; REPRODUCIBILITY; STANDARD;

BLOOD GLUCOSE SELF-MONITORING; FEMALE; HUMANS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY IN DIABETICS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 0035412204     PISSN: 01457217     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/014572170102700407     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. American Diabetes Association. Consensus statement: is quality control in SMBG adequate? Clinical practice recommendations. Diabetes Care. 1990;13(suppl 1):43-43.
2. American Diabetes Association. Consensus statement: what is the current technology? Clinical practice recommendations. Diabetes Care. 1996; 19(suppl 1):S64-S64.
3. Pohl SL, Gonder-Frederick L, Cox DJ, Evans WS. Self-measurement of blood glucose concentration: clinical significance of patient-generated measurements. Diabetes Care. 1985;8:617-618.
4. Clarke WL, Cox D, Gonder-Frederick LA, Carter W, Pohl SL. Evaluating clinical accuracy of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose. Diabetes Care. 2000;23:136-136.
5. Havlin CE, Parvin CA, Cryer PE. The accuracy of blood glucose monitoring devices. Clin Diabetes. 1991;Nov/Dec: 92-93.
6. Carr SR, Slocum J, Tefft L, Haydon B, Carpenter M. Precision of office-based blood glucose meters in screening for gestational diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;0ct: 1267-1272.
7. Brunner GA, Ellmerer M, Sendlhofer G, et al. Validation of home blood glucose meters with respect to clinical and analytical approaches. Diabetes Care. 1998;21:585-590.
8. Poirier JY, LePrieur N, Campion L, Guilhem I, Allannic H, Maugendre D. Clinical and statistical evaluation of self-monitoring blood glucose meters. Diabetes Care. 1998;21: 1919-1924.
9. Wiener K. Whole blood glucose: what are we actually measuring? Ann Clin Biochem. 1995;32:1-8.
10. Geeting DG, Suther CA, Sylbert P. Determination of glucose in serum and whole blood: statistical relationships between values obtained by different methods. Clin Chem. 1972;18:976-979.
11. US Department of Health and Human Services. Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments (CLIA) regional letter. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services; July 14, 1998. Letter 98-06.
12. FDA 510(K) Federal Register 25112 (1995).
13. Voss EM, Cembrowski GS. Analytical performance of the HemoCue B Glucose Analyzer using whole blood samples. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1993; 117:711-713.
14. Jacobs, Ellis. Core Analyte Number PTS 94-1 (PTS-75). Check Sample. 1994;10:1-9.
15. Teng RY, Punla O, Koos BJ. Predictive value of HemoCue capillary whole blood glucose measurements in pregnancy. Soc Gynecol Invest. 1995:618-620.
16. Weiss PAM, Kainer F, Haeusler MCH, Porstner P, Urasch R. A rapid test for diabetes screening during pregnancy [in German]. Geburtsh u Frauenheilk. 1994;54:697-701.
17. Carr DB, Gabbe S. Gestational diabetes: detection, management, and implications. Clin Diabetes. 1998;16:4-11.
18. Scheffler RM, Feuchtbaum LB, Phibbs CS. Prevention: the cost-effectiveness of the California Diabetes and Pregnancy Program. Am J Public Health. 1992;82:168-175.
19. Bergenstal R, Pearson J, Cembrowski GS, Bina D, Davidson J, List S. Identifying variables associated with inaccurate self-monitoring of blood glucose: proposed guidelines to improve accuracy. Diabetes Educ. 2000; 26:981-989.