All Together Now: When Dissociations between Knowledge and Action Disappear

Psychological Science

Volumn 12, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 335-337

  Munakata, Yuko ^a   Yerys, Benjamin E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DENVER   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; VISION;

CHILD, PRESCHOOL; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0035409710     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00361     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Cohen, J.D., Dunbar, K., & McClelland, J.L. (1990). On the control of automatic processes: A parallel distributed processing model of the stroop effect. Pathological Review, 97, 332-361.
2. Cohen, J.D., & Servan-Schreiber, D. (1992). Context, cortex, and dopamine: A connectionist approach to behavior and biology in schizophrenia. Psychological Review, 99, 45-77.
3. Diamond, A. (1985). Development of the ability to use recall to guide action, as indicated by infants' performance on AB̄. Child Development, 56, 868-883.
4. Diamond, A. (1991). Neuropsychological insights into the meaning of object concept development. In S. Carey & R. Gelman (Eds.), The epigenesis of mind (pp. 67-110). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Elman, J., Bates, E., Karmiloff-Smith, A., Johnson, M., Parisi, D., & Plunkett, K. (1996). Rethinking innateness: A connectionist perspective on development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Farah, M.J., O'Reilly, R.C., & Vecera, S.P. (1993). Dissociated overt and covert recognition as an emergent property of a lesioned neural network. Pathological Review, 100, 571-588.
7. Goodale, M.A., & Milner, A.D. (1992). Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neuroscience, 15(1), 20-25.
8. Hofstadter, M.C., & Reznick, J.S. (1996). Response modality affects human infant delayed-response performance. Child Development, 67, 646-658.
9. McClelland, J.L., Rumelhart, D.E., & PDP Research Group (Eds.), (1986). Parallel distributed processing: Vol. 2, Psychological and biological models. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10. Milner, B. (1963). Effects of different brain lesions on card sorting. Archives of Neurology, 9, 90-100.
11. Munakata, Y. (1998). Infant perseveration and implications for object permanence theories: A PDP model of the AB̄ task. Developmental Science, 1, 161-184.
12. Munakata, Y., McClelland, J.L., Johnson, M.H., & Siegler, R. (1997). Rethinking infant knowledge: Toward an adaptive process account of successes and failures in object permanence tasks. Psychological Review, 104, 686-713.
13. O'Reilly, R.C., & Munakata, Y. (2000). Computational explorations in cognitive neuroscience: Understanding the mind by simulating the brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. (M. Cook, Trans.). New York: Basic Books.
15. Siegler, R. (1996). Emerging minds: The process of change in children's thinking. New York: Oxford University Press.
16. Smith, E.B., & Thelen, E. (Eds.), (1993). A dynamic systems approach to development: Applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
17. Thelen, E., & Smith, E.B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. Zelazo, P.D., Frye, D., & Rapus, T. (1996). An age-related dissociation between knowing rules and using them. Cognitive Development, 11, 37-63.
19. Zelazo, P.D., & Reznick, J. (1991). Age-related asynchrony of knowledge and action. Child Development, 62, 719-735.
20. Zelazo, P.D., Reznick, J., & Pinon, D. (1995). Response control and the execution of verbal rules. Developmental Psychology, 31, 508-517.