Ethic conflicts regarding the institution of mechanical ventilation: Analysis of the attitudes of Critical Care, emergency professionals and students;Conflictos éticos en la instauración de la ventilación mecánica: Análisis de la actitud de profesionales de Cuidados Críticos, Emergencia y estudiantes

Revista Clinica Espanola

Volumn 201, Issue 7, 2001, Pages 371-377

  Gomez Rubi J A ^a   Gomez Company J A ^a   Sanmartin Monzo J L ^a   Martinez Fresneda M ^a  

^a HOSPITAL UNIVERSITARIO VIRGEN DE LA ARRIXACA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Ethics; Limitation of therapeutic efforts; Mechanical ventilation; Vital support

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; EMERGENCY HEALTH SERVICE; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; INTENSIVE CARE; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL STUDENT; SPAIN;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; CRITICAL CARE; EMERGENCY SERVICE, HOSPITAL; ETHICS, MEDICAL; HUMANS; RESPIRATION, ARTIFICIAL; SPAIN; STUDENTS, MEDICAL;

EID: 0035408055     PISSN: 00142565     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0014-2565(01)70852-1     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Crippen D. Practical aspects of life support withdrawal: a critical care physician's opinion. Clin Intens Care 1991; 2:260-265.
2. Vincent JL. European attitudes towards ethical problems in intensive care medicine: resultts of a ethical questionaire. Intensive Care Med 1990; 16:256-264.
3. Abizanda R, Almend Ros L, Balerdi B. Aspectos éticos de la medicina intensiva. Resultados de una encuesta de opinion. Med Clin (Barc) 1994; 102:521-526.
4. The Society of Critical Care Medicine Ethics Committee. Attitudes of critical care medicine professionals concerning forgoing life-sustaining treatments. Crit Care Med 1992; 20:320-326.
5. Sprung CL, Eidelman LA Worldwide similarities and differences in the forgoing of life-sustaining treatments. Intens Care Med 1996; 22:1.003-1.005.
6. Levin PD, Spriung CL. End of life decisions in intensive care. Intens Care Med 1999; 25:893-895.
7. Sjökvist P, Nilstun T, Svantesson M, Berggren L. Withdfwal of life support. Who should decide? Differences in attitudes among the general public, nurses and physicians. Intens Care Med 1999; 25:949-954.
8. Gracia D. Métodos de análisis de problemas éticos en la clínica humana. En: Bioética Clínica. Santa Fe de Bogotá: El Búho, 1998; 85-98.
9. Montt Momberg J. Responsabilidad de la OPS/OMS en la enseñanza de la bioética. En: La bioética, lugar de encuentro. Madrid: Asociación de Bioética Fundamental y Clínica, 1999; 61-72.
10. Gracia D. Procedimientos de decisión en ética clínica. Madrid: Eudema Universidad; 1991.
11. Jonsen AR. Encyclopedia of bioethics. Macmillan, 1995.
12. Sadaba J. Diccionario de ética. Barcelona: Planeta, 1997.
13. Jonsen AR, Toulmin S. The abuse of casuisty. A history of moral reasoning. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1988.
14. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principios de ética médica. Barcelona: Masson. 1999; 93.
15. Roca Guiseris J, Ruiz Moreno J, Fernández Mondéjar E, Net Castel A, Vázquez Mata G. La medicina intensiva ante los retos del siglo XXI. Estrategias de adaptación y de cambio. Med Intensiva 1996; 22:137-141.
16. Vincent JL. Information in the ICU: are we being honest with our patients? The results of a european questionaire. Intens Care Med 1998; 24:1.251-1.256.
17. SUPPORT (Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risk of Treatments). Patient age and decisions to withhold life-sustaining treatments from seriously ill, hospitalized patients. Ann Int Med 1999; 130:116-122.
18. Gracia D. The intellectual basis of bioethics in southern european countries. Bioethics 1993; 7:97-107.
19. Vincent JL. Ethical issues in critical care medicine: United States and European views and differences. Intens Care World 1996; 13:142-145.