Individual differences in performance on elementary cognitive tasks (ects): Lawful vs. problematic parameters

Journal of General Psychology

Volumn 128, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 279-314

  Roberts, Richard D ^a   Pallier, Gerry ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Cognitive abilities; Elementary cognitive tasks; Reaction time; Speed of processing

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTELLIGENCE; MALE; PROBLEM SOLVING; RANDOMIZATION; REACTION TIME; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTELLIGENCE; MALE; MIDDLE AGE; PROBLEM SOLVING; RANDOM ALLOCATION; REACTION TIME; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T;

EID: 0035405358     PISSN: 00221309     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00221300109598913     Document Type: Article

References (113)

1. Ackerman, P. L. (1987). Individual differences in skill learning: An integration of psychometric and information processing perspectives. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 3-27.
2. Anderson, M., Nettelbeck, T., and Barlow, J. (1997). Reaction time measures of speed of processing: Speed of response selection increases with age but speed of stimulus categorization does not. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 15, 145-157.
3. Annett, J., Golby, C. W., and Kay, H. (1958). The measurement of elements in an assembly task: The information output of the human motor system. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 10, 1-11.
4. Barrett, P., Eysenck, H. J., and Lucking, S. (1986). Reaction time and intelligence: A replicated study. Intelligence, 10, 9-40.
5. Bates, T., and Stough, C. (1997). Processing speed, attention, and intelligence: Effects of spatial attention on decision time in high and low IQ subjects. Personality and Individual Differences, 23, 861-868.
6. Bates, T., and Stough, C. (1998). Improved reaction time method, information processing speed and intelligence. Intelligence, 26, 53-62.
7. Beauducel, A., and Brocke, B. (1993). Intelligence and speed of information processing: Further results and questions on Hick's paradigm and beyond. Personality and Individual Differences, 15, 627-636.
8. Beh, H. C., Roberts, R. D., and Prichard-Levy, A. (1994). The relationship between intelligence and choice reaction time within the framework of an extended model of Hick's Law: A preliminary report. Personality and Individual Differences, 16, 891-897.
9. Bittner, A. C., Jr., Carter, R. C., Kennedy, R. S., Harbeson, M. M., and Krause, M. (1986). Performance evaluation tests for environmental research (PETER): Evaluation of 114 measures. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 63, 683-708.
10. Brainard, R. W., Irby, T. S., Fitts, P. M., and Alluisi, E. A. (1962). Some variables influencing the rate of gain of information. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63, 105-110.
11. Brody, N. (1992). Intelligence (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press.
12. Buckhalt, J. A., Reeve, T. G., and Dornier, L. A. (1990). Correlations of movement time and intelligence: Effects of simplifying response requirements. Intelligence, 14, 481-491.
13. Carroll, J. B. (1981). Ability and task difficulty in cognitive psychology. Educational Researcher, 10, 11-21.
14. Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
15. Carroll, J. B. (1995). On methodology in the study of cognitive abilities. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30, 429-452.
16. Christ, R. E. (1970). Some effects of stimulus exposure time on choice reaction time. American Journal of Psychology, 83, 264-267.
17. Clark, H. H., and Chase, W. G. (1972). On the process of comparing sentences against pictures. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 472-517.
18. Crick, F. (1993). Astonishing hypothesis: The scientific search for the soul. New York: Maxwell Macmillan.
19. Crossman, E. R. F. W. (1953). Entropy and choice reaction time: The effect of frequency imbalance on choice-response. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 5, 41-51.
20. Deary, I. J., and Stough, C. (1996). Intelligence and inspection time: Achievements, prospects and problems. American Psychologist, 51, 599-608.
21. DeJong, R., Liang, C.-C., and Lauber, E. (1994). Conditional and unconditional automaticity: A dual process model of effects of spatial-response correspondence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20, 731-750.
22. Diascro, M. N., and Brody, N. (1994). Odd-man-out and intelligence. Intelligence, 19, 79-92.
23. Eimer, M. (1995). Stimulus-response compatibility and automatic response activation: Evidence from psychophysiological studies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 837-854.
24. Eysenck, H. J. (1987). Speed of information processing, reaction time, and the theory of intelligence. In P. A. Vernon (Ed.), Speed of information-processing and intelligence (pp. 21-67). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
25. Fitts, P. M. (1954). The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 381-391.
26. Fitts, P. M., and Peterson, J. R. (1964). Information capacity of discrete motor responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67, 103-112.
27. Fitts, P. M., and Seeger, C. M. (1953). S-R compatibility: Spatial characteristics of stimulus and response codes. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46, 199-210.
28. Fleishman, E. A., and Hempel, W. E., Jr. (1954). Changes in factor structure of a complex psychomotor test as a function of practice. Psychometrika, 19, 239-252.
29. Frearson, W. M., Barrett, P. T., and Eysenck, H. J. (1988). Intelligence, reaction time, and the effects of smoking. Personality and Individual Differences, 9, 497-517.
30. Frearson, W. M., and Eysenck, H. J. (1986). Intelligence, reaction time (RT), and a new "odd-man-out" RT paradigm. Personality and Individual Differences, 7, 808-817.
31. Georgopoulos, A. P., Lurito, J. T., Petrides, M., Schwartz, A. B., and Massey, J. T. (1989). Mental rotation of the neuronal population vector. Science, 243, 234-236.
32. Guttman, L. (1955). A generalized simplex for factor analysis and a faceted definition of intelligence. Psychometrika, 20, 173-192.
33. Hale, S., and Jansen, J. (1994). Global processing-time coefficients characterize individual and group differences in cognitive speed. Psychological Science, 5, 384-389.
34. Hick, W. E. (1952). On the rate of gain of information. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 4, 11-26.
35. Hoffmann, E. R., and Sheikh, I. H. (1991). Finger width corrections in Fitts' law: Implications for speed-accuracy research. Journal of Motor Behavior, 23, 259-262.
36. Hunt, E. B. (1978). Mechanisms of verbal ability. Psychological Review, 85, 109-130.
37. Hunt, E. (1999). Intelligence and human resources: Past, present, and future. In P. L. Ackerman, P. C. Kyllonen, and R. D. Roberts (Eds.), Learning and individual differences: Process, trait, and content determinates (pp. 3-28). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
38. Hunt, E. B., Davidson, J., and Lansman, M. (1981). Individual differences in long-term memory access. Memory and Cognition, 9, 599-608.
39. Hunt, E. B., and Lansman, M. (1982). Individual differences in attention. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the psychology of human intelligence (vol. 1, pp. 207-254). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
40. Hyman, R. (1953). Stimulus information as a determinant of reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 45, 188-196.
41. Ippel, M. J. (1986). Component-testing: A theory of cognitive aptitude measurement. Amsterdam: Free Press.
42. Jensen, A. R. (1979). g: Outmoded theory or unconquered frontier? Creative Science and Technology, 2, 16-29.
43. Jensen, A. R. (1982). Reaction time and psychometric g. In H. J. Eysenck (Ed.), A model for intelligence (pp. 93-132). New York: Springer-Verlag.
44. Jensen, A. R. (1987). Individual differences in the Hick paradigm. In P. A. Vernon (Ed.), Speed of information-processing and intelligence (pp. 101-175). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
45. Jensen, A. R. (1992). The importance of intraindividual variation in reaction time. Personality and Individual Differences, 13, 869-891.
46. Jensen, A. R. (1993). Why is reaction time correlated with psychometric g? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 2, 53-56.
47. Jensen, A. R. (1998). The suppressed relationship between IQ and reaction time slope parameter of the Hick function. Intelligence, 26, 43-52.
48. Jensen, A. R., and Vernon, P. A. (1986). Jensen's reaction time studies: A reply to Longstreth. Intelligence, 10, 153-179.
49. Juhel, J. (1991). Relationships between psychometric intelligence and information-processing speed indexes. European Bulletin of Cognitive Psychology, 11, 73-105.
50. Kaswan, J., and Young, S. (1965). Effect of luminance, exposure duration, and task complexity on reaction time. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69, 393-400.
51. Kornblum, S. (1967). Choice reaction time for repetitions and non-repetitions: A re-examination of the information hypothesis. In A. F. Sanders (Ed.), Attention and performance I (pp. 178-187). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
52. Kornblum, S. (1968). Serial-choice reaction time: Inadequacies of the information hypothesis. Science, 159, 432-434.
53. Kornblum, S. (1992). Dimensional overlap and dimensional relevance in stimulus-response and stimulus-stimulus compatibility. In G. E. Stelmach and J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor behavior II. Advances in psychology (vol. 87, pp. 743-777). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
54. Kornblum, S. (1994). The way irrelevant dimensions are processed depends on what they overlap-with: The case of Stroop- and Simon-like stimuli. Psychological Research, 56, 130-135.
55. Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., and Osman, A. (1990). Dimensional overlap: Cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility - a model and taxonomy. Psychological Review, 97, 253-270.
56. Kornblum, S., and Lee, J-W. (1995). Stimulus-response compatibility with relevant and irrelevant stimulus dimensions that do and do not overlap with the response. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 21, 855-875.
57. Kranzler, J. H. (1994). Application of the techniques of mental chronometry to the study of learning disabilities. Personality and Individual Differences, 16, 853-859.
58. Kranzler, J. H., and Jensen, A. R. (1989). Inspection time and intelligence: A meta-analysis. Intelligence, 13, 329-347.
59. Larson, G. E., and Alderton, D. L. (1990). Reaction time variability and intelligence: A "worst performance" analysis of individual differences. Intelligence, 14, 309-325.
60. Lindley, R. H., Wilson, S. M., Smith, W. R., and Bathurst, K. (1995). Reaction time (RT) and IQ: Shape of the task complexity function. Personality and Individual Differences, 18, 339-345.
61. Lohman, D. F. (1994). Component scores as residual variation (or why the intercept correlates best). Intelligence, 19, 1-11.
62. Lohman, D. F. (1999). Minding our p's and q's: On finding relationships between learning and intelligence. In P. L. Ackerman, P. C. Kyllonen, and R. D. Roberts (Eds.), Learning and individual differences: Process, trait, and content determinants (pp. 55-76). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
63. Longstreth, L. E. (1984). Jensen's reaction time investigations of intelligence: A critique. Intelligence, 8, 139-160.
64. Longstreth, L. E. (1986). The real and the unreal: A reply to Jensen and Vernon. Intelligence, 10, 181-191.
65. Luce, R. D. (1986). Response times. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
66. Luce, R. D., and Tukey, J. W. (1964). Simultaneous conjoint measurement: A new type of fundamental measurement. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1, 1-27.
67. Makintosh, N. J. (1998). IQ and human intelligence. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
68. McGill, W. J. (1963). Stochastic latency mechanisms. In R. D. Luce, R. R. Bush, and E. Galanter (Eds.), Handbook of mathematical psychology (vol. 1, pp. 309-360). New York: Wiley.
69. Michell, J. (1990). An introduction to the logic of psychological measurement. Hillsdale NJ: Erlbaum.
70. Miller, E. M. (1994). Intelligence and brain myelination: A hypothesis. Personality and Individual Differences, 17, 803-832.
71. Mowbray, G. H. (1960). Choice reaction times for skilled responses. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 12, 193-202.
72. Mowbray, G. H., and Rhoades, M. V. (1959). On the reduction of choice reaction time with practice. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11, 16-23.
73. Neisser, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
74. Nettelbeck, T. (1987). Inspection time and intelligence. In P. A. Vernon (Ed.), Speed of information-processing and intelligence (pp. 295-346). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
75. Neubauer, A. C., and Bucik, V. (1996). The mental speed-IQ relationship: Unitary or modular? Intelligence, 22, 23-48.
76. Neubauer, A., and Knorr, E. (1997). Elementary cognitive processes in choice reaction time tasks and their correlation with intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 23, 715-728.
77. Posner, M. I. (1978). Chronometric explorations of mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
78. Posner, M. I., and Mitchell, R. (1967). Chronometric analysis of classification. Psychological Review, 74, 392-409.
79. Rabbitt, P. M. A. (1994). Crystal quest: A search for the basis of maintenance of practiced skills into old age. In A. Baddeley and L. Weiskrantz (Eds.), Attention, selection, awareness, and control: A tribute to Donald Broadbent (pp. 188-230). London: Clarendon Press.
80. Ree, M. J., and Carretta, T. R. (1996). Central role of g in military pilot selection. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology, 6, 111-123.
81. Roberts, R. D. (1995). Speed of processing within the structure of human cognitive abilities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Sydney, Australia.
82. Roberts, R. D. (1997a, July). The factor structure of reaction time and its relationships to intelligence. Paper presented at the Second Spearman Conference, University of Plymouth, Plymouth, England.
83. Roberts, R. D. (1997b). Fitts' law, movement time, and intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 23, 227-246.
84. Roberts, R. D. (1997c, July). Processing speed, stimulus-response compatibility, and intelligence. A symposium paper presented at the VIIIth Biennial Meeting of the International Society for the Study of Individual Differences, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark.
85. Roberts, R. D. (2000). A description and empirical evaluation of ten elementary cognitive tasks (ECTs) subscribing to information theoretic principles. IDCAU Technical Report 2000-1. Sydney: Differences and Computerized Assessment Unit (IDCAU), Department of Psychology, University of Sydney. Also available online: http://www.psych.usyd.edu.au/difference5/index2.html
86. Roberts, R. D., Beh, H. C., Spilsbury, G., and Stankov, L. (1991). Evidence for an attentional model of human intelligence using the competing task paradigm. Personality and Individual Differences, 12, 445-455.
87. Roberts, R. D., Beh, H. C., and Stankov, L. (1988). Hick's law, competing tasks, and intelligence. Intelligence, 12, 111-131.
88. Roberts, R. D., Pallier, G., and Goff, G. N. (1999). Sensory processes within the structure of human cognitive abilities. In P. L. Ackerman, P. C. Kyllonen, and R. D. Roberts (Eds.), Learning and individual differences: Process, trait, and content determinants (pp. 339-368). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
89. Roberts, R. D., and Stankov, L. (1995, July). Mental speed within the structure of human cognitive abilities. Paper presented at the VIIth Meeting of the International Society for the Study of Individual Differences, Warsaw, Poland.
90. Roberts, R. D., and Stankov, L. (1999). Individual differences in speed of mental processing and human cognitive abilities: Toward a taxonomic model. Learning and Individual Differences, 11, 1-120.
91. Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104, 192-233.
92. Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch and B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 27-48). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
93. Roth, E. (1964). Die Geschwindigkeit der Verarbeitung von Information und ihr Zusammenhang mit Intelligenz [The speed of information-processing and its connection with intelligence]. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle und Angewandte Psychologie, 11, 616-623.
94. Salthouse, T. A. (1996). The processing-speed theory of adult age differences in cognition. Psychological Review, 103, 403-428.
95. Schmidt, R. A., Zelaznik, H., Hawkins, B., Frank, J. S., and Quinn, J. T., Jr. (1979). Motoroutput variability: A theory for the accuracy of rapid motor acts. Psychological Review, 86, 415-451.
96. Schwartz, S. (1981). Verbal ability, attention, and automaticity. In M. P. Friedman, J. P. Das, and N. O'Connor (Eds.), Intelligence and learning (pp. 567-574). New York: Plenum.
97. Shannon, C. E., and Weaver, W. (1949). The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
98. Shepard, R. N., and Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701-703.
99. Smith, G. A. (1989). Strategies and procedures affecting the accuracy of reaction time parameters and their correlations with intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 10, 829-835.
100. Stankov, L. (1987). Competing task and attentional resources: Exploring the limits of primary-secondary paradigm. Australian Journal of Psychology, 39, 123-137.
101. Stankov, L. (1989). Attentional resources and intelligence: A disappearing link. Personality and Individual Differences, 10, 957-968.
102. Stankov, L., and Cregan, A. (1993). Quantitative and qualitative properties of an intelligence test: Series completion. Learning and Individual Differences, 5, 137-169.
103. Stankov, L., and Roberts, R. D. (1997). Mental speed is not the basic process of intelligence. Personality and Individual Differences, 22, 69-85.
104. Stankov, L., Roberts, R. D., and Spilsbury, G. (1994). Attention and speed of test-taking in intelligence and aging. Personality and Individual Differences, 17, 273-284.
105. Sternberg, R. J. (1986). Haste makes waste versus a stitch in time? A reply to Vernon, Nador, and Kantor. Intelligence, 10, 265-270.
106. Sternberg, S. (1969). Memory scanning: Mental processes revealed by reaction time experiments. American Scientist, 57, 421-457.
107. Teichner, W. H., and Krebs, M. J. (1974). Laws of visual choice reaction time. Psychological Review, 81, 75-98.
108. Vernon, P. A. (1983). Speed of information processing and general intelligence. Intelligence, 7, 53-70.
109. Wang, H., and Proctor, R. W. (1996). Stimulus-response compatibility as a function of stimulus code and response modality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 22, 1201-1217.
110. Welford, A. T. (1968). Fundamentals of skill. London: Methuen.
111. Welford, A. T., Morris, A. H., and Shock, N. W. (1969). Speed and accuracy of movement and their changes with age. Acta Psychologica, 30, 3-15.
112. Widaman, K. F., and Carlson, J. S. (1989). Procedural effects on performance on the Hick paradigm: Bias in reaction time and movement time parameters. Intelligence, 13, 63-85.
113. Wing, A. M., and Kristofferson, A. B. (1973). Response delays and the timing of discrete motor responses. Perception and Psychophysics, 14, 5-12.