The Effect of Surface Treatment on the Shear Bond Strength of Luting Cement to a Glass-Infiltrated Alumina Ceramic

International Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 335-339

  Özcan, Mutlu ^a,b   Alkumru, Hasan N ^a   Gemalmaz, Deniz ^a  

^a MARMARA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b Haci Emin Efendi Sok ^*  (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALUMINUM OXIDE; COMPOMER; HYDROFLUORIC ACID; IN CERAM; IN-CERAM; RESIN CEMENT; ROCATEC; SILANE DERIVATIVE; TOOTH CEMENT;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; MATERIALS TESTING; SURFACE PROPERTY; TENSILE STRENGTH; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ALUMINUM OXIDE; COMPOMERS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CEMENTS; DENTAL PORCELAIN; HYDROFLUORIC ACID; MATERIALS TESTING; RESIN CEMENTS; SILANES; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TENSILE STRENGTH;

EID: 0035404137     PISSN: 08932174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Pfeiffer P, Schwickerath H, Sommer MC. Festigkeit dentalkeramischer Massen. Zahnarztl Welt 1991;100:938-942.
2. Geis-Gerstorfer J, Kanjantra P. Zum Einfluss der Prüfmethode auf die Biegefestigkeit von IPS-Empress und In-Ceram. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 1992;47:618-621.
3. Claus H. Vita In-Ceram, A new system for producing aluminum oxide crown and bridge substructures. Quintessenz Zahntech 1990;16:35-46.
4. Kern M, Knode H, Strub JR. The all porcelain, resin-bonded bridge. Quintessence Int 1991;22:257-262.
5. Moffa JP. Clinical Evaluation of Dental Restorative Materials -Final Report. Interagency agreement No. 1Y01-DE40001-05. San Francisco: Letterman Army Institute of Research, 1988.
6. Höglund Aberg C, van Dijken JWV, Olofson AL. Three year comparison of fired ceramic inlays cemented with composite resin or glass ionomer cement. Acta Odontol Scand 1994;52:140-149.
7. Thompson JY, Rapp MM, Parker AJ. Microscopic and energy dispersive x-ray analysis of surface adaptation of dental cements to dental ceramic surfaces. J Prosthet Dent 1998;79:378-383.
8. Kelly JR, Campbell SD, Bowen HK. Fracture-surface analysis of dental ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:536-541.
9. Kelly JR, Giordano R, Pober R, Cima MJ. Fracture-surface analysis of dental ceramics: Clinically failed restoration. Int J Prosthodont 1990;3:430-440.
10. Anusavice KJ, Hojjatie B. Tensile stress in glass-ceramic crowns: Effect of flaws and cementation voids. Int J Prosthodont 1992;5: 351-358.
11. Stangel I, Nathanson D, Hsu CS. Shear strength of the composite bond to etched porcelain. J Dent Res 1987;66:1460-1465.
12. Sorensen JA, Kang SK, Avera SP. Porcelain-composite interface microleakage with various porcelain surface treatments. Dent Mater 1991;7:118-123.
13. Lu R, Harcourt JK, Tyas MJ, Alexander B. An investigation of the composite resin/porcelain interface. Aust Dent J 1992;37:12-19.
14. Tylka DF, Stewart G. Comparison of acidulated phosphate fluoride gel and hydrofluoric acid etchants for porcelain-composite repair. J Prosthet Dent 1994;72:121-127.
15. Roulet JF, Söderholm KJM, Longmate J. Effects of treatment and storage conditions on ceramic/composite bond strength. J Dent Res 1995;74:381-387.
16. Pameijer CH, Louw NP, Fischer D. Repairing fractured porcelain: How surface preparation affects shear force resistance. J Am Dent Assoc 1996;127:203-209.
17. Ritter JE, Lin MR. Effect of polymer coatings on the strength and fatigue behaviour of indented soda-lime glass. Glass Technol 1991;32:51-54.
18. Rosenstiel SF, Gupta PK, Van der Sluys RA, Zimmermann MH. Strength of a dental glass-ceramic after surface coating. Dent Mater 1993;9:274-279.
19. Kern M, Neikes MJ, Strub JR. Haftfestigkeit des Klebeverbundes auf In-Ceram nach unterschiedlicher Oberflächenkonditionierung. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 1991;46:758-761.
20. Wood DJ, Bubb NL, Millar BJ, Dunne SM. Preliminary investigation of a novel retentive system for hydrofluoric acid etch-resistant dental ceramics. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:275-280.
21. Calamia JR. Etched porcelain veneers: The current state of the art. Quintessence Int 1985;1:5-12.
22. Aida M, Hayakawa T, Mizukawa K. Adhesion of composite to porcelain with various surface conditions. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73: 464-470.
23. Fischer J, Schmid M, Kappert HF, Strub JR. Gefügeausbildung der dentalkeramischen Kernmasse In-Ceram und thermische Dehnung ihrer Einzelkomponenten. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 1991;46:461-463.
24. Kern M, Thompson VP. Bonding to glass infiltrated alumina ceramic: Adhesive methods and their durability. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:240-249.
25. International Standards Organization. Amendment ISO 10477. Dentistry - Polymer-Based Crown and Bridge Materials. Geneva: ISO, 1996.
26. Attin T, Vataschki M, Hellwig E. Properties of resin-modified glass ionomer restorative materials and two polyacid-modified resin composite materials. Quintessence Int 1996;27:203-209.
27. Kern M, Thompson VP. Sandblasting and silica coating of a glass-infiltrated alumina ceramic: Volume loss, morphology and changes in the surface composition. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:453-461.
28. Pröbster L. Untersuchung zur Scherfestigkeit des In-Ceram-Kunststoff-Verbundes. Dtsch Zahnarztl Z 1992;47:292-294.
29. Appeldoorn RE, Wilwerding TM, Barkmeier WW. Bond strength of composite resin to porcelain with newer generation porcelain repair systems. J Prosthet Dent 1993;70:6-11.