Regulation of sexuality: Age of consent, section 28 and sex education

Parliamentary Affairs

Volumn 54, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 495-508

  Waites, Matthew ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035402213     PISSN: 00312290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/parlij/54.3.495     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. M. Wanes, 'The Age of Consent and Sexual Citizenship in the United Kingdom: A History' in J. Seymour and P. Bagguley (eds), Relating Intimacies: Power and Resistance, Macmillan, 1999.
2. Scottish Executive, Report on the Working Group on Sex Education in Scottish Schools, June 2000.
3. For UK debates between October 1999 and May 2000 see: S. Wise, '"New Right" or "Backlash"? Section 28, Moral Panic and "Promoting Homosexuality"', Sociological Research Online, May 2000, .
4. Department for Education and Employment, Sex and Relationship Education Guidance: Draft for Consultation, March 2000; Sex and Relationship Guidance, July 2000.
5. Department for Education and Employment, Sex and Relationship Education Guidance: Draft for Consultation, March 2000; Sex and Relationship Guidance, July 2000.
6. See the Christian Institute reports: Age of Consent: The Case Against Change, March 1999; Bankrolling Gay Proselytism: The Case for Extending Section 28, November 1999; The Case for Keeping Section 28, January 2000; and Lost Out of Care: Why Liberalising the Law on Sexual Offences will Damage Children, April 2000.
7. See the Christian Institute reports: Age of Consent: The Case Against Change, March 1999; Bankrolling Gay Proselytism: The Case for Extending Section 28, November 1999; The Case for Keeping Section 28, January 2000; and Lost Out of Care: Why Liberalising the Law on Sexual Offences will Damage Children, April 2000.
8. See the Christian Institute reports: Age of Consent: The Case Against Change, March 1999; Bankrolling Gay Proselytism: The Case for Extending Section 28, November 1999; The Case for Keeping Section 28, January 2000; and Lost Out of Care: Why Liberalising the Law on Sexual Offences will Damage Children, April 2000.
9. See the Christian Institute reports: Age of Consent: The Case Against Change, March 1999; Bankrolling Gay Proselytism: The Case for Extending Section 28, November 1999; The Case for Keeping Section 28, January 2000; and Lost Out of Care: Why Liberalising the Law on Sexual Offences will Damage Children, April 2000.
10. See Stonewall pamphlets: The Case for Equality: Arguments for an Equal Age of Consent and Repealing Section 28: Clause 68, Local Government Bill - Parliamentary Briefing.
11. M. Read, D. Marsh and D. Richards, 'Why Did They Do It? Voting on Homosexuality and Capital Punishment in the House of Commons', Parliamentary Affairs, July 1994.
12. On contemporary Conservatism see M. Waites, 'Homosexuality and the New Right: The Legacy of the 1980s for New Delineations of Homophobia', Sociological Research Online, May 2000, .
13. European Commission on Human Rights, 'Euan Sutherland against the United Kingdom: Report of the Commission', July 1997.
14. D. Shell, 'Labour and the House of Lords: A Case Study in Constitutional Reform', Parliamentary Affairs, April 2000.
15. Ibid, p. 308.