Corneal surface area: An index of anterior segment growth

Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 286-295

  Stone, Richard A ^a   Lin, Ton ^a   Sugimoto, Reiko ^a   Capehart, Cheryl ^a   Maguire, Maureen G ^a   Schmid, Gregor F ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b Institut de Recherche en Ophtalmologie   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANATOMY; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ANTERIOR EYE SEGMENT; ARTICLE; CHICKEN; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORNEA; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KERATOMETRY; NONHUMAN; PHOTOPERIODICITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURFACE PROPERTY; TECHNIQUE;

ANIMALS; ANTERIOR EYE SEGMENT; BIOMETRY; CHICKENS; CORNEA; FEMALE; FREEZE DRYING; MALE; PHOTOGRAPHY; PHOTOPERIOD; REFRACTION, OCULAR;

EID: 0035400682     PISSN: 02755408     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0275-5408(00)00056-9     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. American Academy of Ophthalmology . Corneal topography. Ophthalmology. 106:1999;1628-1638.
2. Anton, H. (1980). Techniques of integration. In: Calculus, John Wiley and Sons, New York, p. 528.
3. Bennett A.G. Aspherical contact lens surfaces. The Ophthalmic Optician. 8:1968;1037-1040.
4. Bennett A.G., Rabbetts R.B. What radius does the conventional keratometer measure? Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. 11:1991;239-247.
5. Carney L.G., Mainstone J.C., Henderson B.A. Corneal topography and myopia. A cross-sectional study. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 38:1997;311-320.
6. Coulombre A.J., Coulombre J.L., Mehta H. The skeleton of the eye. I. Conjunctival papillae and scleral ossicles. Dev. Biol. 5:1962;382-401.
7. Ehrlich D., Sattayasai J., Zappia J., Barrington M. Effects of selective neurotoxins on eye growth in the young chick. Bock G., Widdows K., Myopia and the Control of Eye Growth. Ciba Foundation Symposium 155. 1990;63-88 Wiley, Chichester.
8. Eves H. Geometry. Beyer W.H., CRC Handbook of Mathematical Sciences. 6th ed. 1987;152-164 CRC Press, Inc, Boca Raton.
9. Fowler C.W., Dave T.N. Review of past and present techniques of measuring corneal topography. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. 14:1994;49-58.
10. Goss D.A., Erickson P. Meridional corneal components of myopia progression in young adults and children. Am. J. Optom. Physiol. Optics. 64:1987;475-481.
11. Guillon M., Lydon D.P.M., Wilson C. Corneal topography: a clinical model. Ophthal. Physiol. Opt. 6:1986;47-56.
12. Hanselmann, D. and Littlefield, B. (1995). Integration. In: The Math Works, Inc. The Student Edition of Matlab®, Version 4 User's Guide. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 135-137.
13. Horner D.G., Soni S., Vyas N., Himebaugh N.L. Longitudinal changes in corneal asphericity in myopia. Optom. Vis. Sci. 77:2000;198-203.
14. Howland H.C., Sayles N. Photokeratometric and photorefractive measurements of astigmatism in infants and young children. Vision Res. 25:1985;73-81.
15. Koretz J.F., Rogot A., Kaufman P.L. Physiological strategies for emmetropia. Trans. Am. Ophthalmol. Soc. 93:1995;105-118.
16. Kraemer C.Y. Extension of multiple range tests to group means with unequal numbers of replications. Biometrics. 12:1956;307-310.
17. Li T., Troilo D., Glasser A., Howland H.C. Constant light produces severe corneal flattening and hyperopia in chickens. Vision Res. 35:1995;1203-1209.
18. Liang K.Y., Zeger S.L. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika. 73:1986;13-22.
19. Lipsitz S.L., Harrington D.P. Analyzing correlated binary data using SAS. Computers and Biomedical Res. 23:1990;268-282.
20. Mandell R.B., Corzine J.C., Klein S.A. Peripheral corneal topography and the limbus. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. (39 (Suppl.)):1998;1036. (Abstract).
21. Middlemiss R.R. Areas of surfaces of revolution. Differential and Integral Calculus. 1st ed :1940;219-222 McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc, New York.
22. Mutti D.O., Zadnik K., Fusaro R.E., Friedman N.E., Sholtz R.I., Adams A.J. Optical and structural development of the crystalline lens in childhood. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 39:1998;120-133.
23. Roberts C. Characterization of the inherent error in a spherically-biased corneal topography system in mapping a radially aspheric surface. J. Refrac. Corneal Surg. 10:1994;103-111.
24. Roberts C. The accuracy of `power' maps to display curvature data in corneal topography systems. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 35:1994;3525-3532.
25. SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT User's Guide, Version 6. 4th ed :1989;SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC. Volume 2.
26. Schmid K., Wildsoet C. Breed- and gender-dependent differences in eye growth and form deprivation responses in chick. J. Comp. Physiol. A. 178:1996;551-561.
27. Scott R., Grosvenor T. Structural model for emmetropic and myopic eyes. Ophthal. Physiol. Optics. 13:1993;41-47.
28. Sorsby, A., Benjamin, B., Davey, J. B., Sheridan, M. and Tanner, J. M. (1957). Emmetropia and its Aberrations. A Study in the Optical Components of the Eye. Medical Research Council Special Report Series, No. 293. Her Majesty's Stationery Office, London, pp. 1-48.
29. Stone R.A., Lin T., Desai D., Capehart C. Photoperiod, early post-natal eye growth, and visual deprivation. Vision Res. 35:1995;1195-1202.
30. Troilo D. Neonatal eye growth and emmetropizationa literature review. Eye. 6:1992;154-160.
31. Wildsoet C.F., Pettigrew J.D. Kainic acid-induced eye enlargement in chickens: differential effects on anterior and posterior segments. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 29:1988;311-319.
32. Wilson S.E., Wang J.-Y., Klyce S.D. Quantification and mathematical analysis of photokeratoscopic images. Schanzlin D.J., Robin J.B., Corneal Topography. Measuring and Modifying the Cornea. 1992;1-9 Springer-Verlag, New York.
33. Zhu X., Lin T., Stone R.A., Laties A.M. Sex differences in chick eye growth and experimental myopia. Exp. Eye Res. 61:1995;173-179.