Postoptimal analysis in a multi-attribute decision model for restoring contaminated aquatic ecosystems

Journal of the Operational Research Society

Volumn 52, Issue 7, 2001, Pages 727-738

  Mateos, A ^a   Rios Insua, S ^a   Gallego, E ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

Aquatic ecosystem; Decision analysis; Multi attribute additive value; Radionuclide contamination; Sensitivity analysis

Indexed keywords

CONTAMINATION; DATABASE SYSTEMS; DECISION MAKING; ECOSYSTEMS; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; RADIOISOTOPE REMOVAL (WATER TREATMENT); REMEDIATION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

AQUATIC ECOSYSTEMS; POSTOPTIMAL ANALYSIS;

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS;

EID: 0035394597     PISSN: 01605682     EISSN: 14769360     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jors.2601156     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Appelgren A et al (eds) (1996). An outline of a model-based expert system to identify optimal remedial strategies for restoring contaminated aquatic ecosystems: the project MOIRA. Report RT/AMB/96/17, ENEA.
2. Monte L, Hakanson L and Brittain JE (eds) (1997). Prototype models for the MOIRA computerised systems. Report RT/AMB/97/5, ENEA.
3. French S (1986). Decision Theory: An Introduction to the Mathematics of Rationality. Ellis Horwood: Chichester.
4. Monte L and Brittain JE (eds) (1998). Principles for the development and implementation of the MOIRA computerised system. Report RT/AmB/98/4, ENEA.
5. Keeney RL and Raiffa H (1976). Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Trade-offs. Wiley: New York.
6. Stewart TJ (1996). Robustness of additive value function methods in MCDM. J Multi-Criteria Decision Anal 5: 301-309.
7. Rios Insua D (1990). Sensitivity Analysis in Multiobjective Decision Making. LNEMS 347. Springer: Berlin.
8. Rios Insua D and French S (1991). A framework for sensitivity analysis in discrete multi-objective decision-making. Eur J Opl Res 54: 176-190.
9. Gallego E, Ri'os-Insua S, Mateos A and Rios Insua D (1998). Contaminated aquatic ecosystems restoration: a case study. In: Giron FJ (ed). Applied Decision Analysis. Kluwer: Boston, pp 19-34.
10. Vik R (1978). The lake 0vre Heimdalsvatn, a subalpine freshwater ecosystem. Holartic Ecology 1: 81-320.
11. Rios-Insua S, Rios Insua D, Mateos A and Gallego E (1997). Overview of decision analysis applied to the evaluation of remedial measures. In: Monte L, Hakanson L and Brittain JE (eds). Prototype Models for the MOIRA Computerised System. Report RT/AMB/97/5, ENEA, pp 43-63.
12. Hakanson L (1993). A system for lake ecosystem indices, J Aquatic Ecosystem Health 2: 165-184.
13. Atherton E and French S (1997). Modelling attributes over times. RODOS Report (WG5)-TN(97)11, School of Informatics, University of Manchester.
14. Raiffa H (1982). The Art and Science ofNegotiation. Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.
15. Hershey JC, Kunreuther HC and Schoemaker PJ (1982). Sources of bias in assessments procedures for utility functions. Mngmnt Sci 28: 936-953.
16. Jaffray JY (1989). Some experimental findings on decision making under risk and their implications. Eur J Opl Res 38: 301-306.
17. McCord M and de Neufville R (1986). “Lottery equivalents”: reduction of the certainty effect problem in utility assessment. Mngmnt Sci 32: 56-61.
18. Farquhar PH (1984). Utility assessment methods. Mngmnt Sci 30: 1283-1300.
19. von Nitzsch R and Weber M (1988). Utility function assessment on a micro-computer: An interactive procedure. Ann Opns Res 16: 149-160.
20. Rios S, Rios-Insua S, Rios Insua D and Pachon JG (1994). Experiments in robust decision making. In: Rios S (ed). Decision Theory and Decision Analysis: Trends and Challenges. Kluwer: Boston, pp 233-242.
21. Kirkwood CW (1997). Strategic Decision Making. Multiobjective Decision Analysis with Spreadsheets. Duxbury Press: Belmont.
22. Belton V (1995). VISA for Windows. Visual Thinking International Limited, V 4.10, Glasgow.
23. Chambers JM, Cleveland WS, Kleiner B and Tukey PA (1983). Graphical Methods for Data Analysis. Duxbury Press: Belmont.
24. Kirkwood CW (1992). Estimating the impact of uncertainty on a deterministic multiattribute evaluation. Mngmnt Sci 38: 819-826.