Will we be working together again? The impact of future interdependence on group members' task motivation

European Journal of Social Psychology

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2001, Pages 369-378

  Groenenboom, Arieneke ^a   Wilke, Henk A M ^b   Wit, Arjaan P ^b  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0035385034     PISSN: 00462772     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.48     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Adams S. 1965. Inequity in social exchange. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 2), Berkowitz L (ed.). Academic Press: New York; 276-299.
2. Arnold JA, Carnevale PJ. 1997. Preferences for dispute resolution procedures as a function of intentionality, consequences, expected future interaction and power. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 27: 371-398.
3. Axelrod R. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. Basic Books: New York.
4. Baron RS, Kerr NL, Miller N. 1992. Group Process, Group Decision, Group Action. Open University Press: Buckingham.
5. Ben-Yoav O, Pruitt D. 1984. Resistance to yielding and the expectation of cooperative future interaction in negotiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 20: 323-353.
6. Brewer MB, Gardner W. 1996. Who is this 'we'? Levels of collective identity and self-representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 71: 83-93.
7. Brown BR, Garland H. 1971. The effects of incompetency, audience acquaintanceship and anticipated evaluative feedback on face-saving behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 7: 490-502.
8. Deutsch M. 1949. A theory of cooperation and competition. Human Relations 2: 199-231.
9. Festinger L. 1954. A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations 1: 117-140.
10. Gouldner AW. 1960. The norm of reciprocity: a preliminary statement. American Sociological Review 25: 161-178.
11. Harkins S, Petty RE. 1982. Effects of task difficulty and task uniqueness on social loafing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 43: 1214-1229.
12. Jackson JM, Harkins SG. 1985. Equity in effort: an explanation of the social loafing effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 49: 1199-1206.
13. Kameda T, Stasson MF, Davis JH, Parks CD, Zimmerman SK. 1992. Social dilemmas, subgroups and motivation loss in task-oriented groups: in search of an optimal team size in division of work. Social Psychology Quarterly 5: 47-56.
14. Katz D, Kahn RL. 1966. The Social Psychology of Organizations. John Wiley: New York.
15. Kerr NL. 1983. Motivation losses in small groups: a social dilemma analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 45: 819-828.
16. Kerr NL. 1986. Motivational choices in task groups: a paradigm for social dilemma research. In Experimental Social Dilemmas, Wilke HAM, Messick DM, Rutte CG (eds). Verlag Peter Lang: New York; 1-27.
17. Kerr NL, Bruun S. 1983. Dispensability of member effort and group motivation losses: free-rider effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 44: 78-94.
18. Lamm H, Kayser E. 1978. The allocation of monetary gain and loss following dyadic performance: the weight given to effort and ability under conditions of low and high intra-dyadic attraction. European Journal of Social Psychology 8: 275-278.
19. Lamm H, Kayser E, Schanz V. 1983. An attributional analysis of interpersonal justice: ability and effort as inputs in the allocation of gain and loss. The Journal of Social Psychology 119: 269-281.
20. Lewis SA, Langan CJ, Hollander EP. 1972. Expectation of future interaction and the choice of less desirable alternatives in conformity. Sociometry 35: 440-447.
21. McClintock GC, Kramer RM, Keil LJ. 1984. Equity and social Exchange in human relationships. In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 17), Berkowitz L. (ed.). Academic Press: New York; 184-225.
22. Messé LA, Sivacek JM. 1979. Predictions of other's responses in a mixed-motive game: self-justification or false consensus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37: 602-607.
23. Murnighan JK, Roth AE. 1983. Expecting continued play in prisoner's dilemma games. Journal of Conflict Resolution 27: 279-300.
24. Paulus PB, Dzindolet MT. 1993. Social influence processes in group brainstorming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 64: 575-586.
25. Pruitt DG. 1998. Social conflict. In The Handbook of Social Psychology (Vol. 2, 4th edn), Gilbert DT, Fiske ST, Gardner L. (eds). McGraw-Hill; Boston, MA; 470-503.
26. Seta JJ, Hassan RK. 1980. Awareness of prior success or failure: A critical factor in task performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39: 70-76.
27. Shapiro EG. 1975. Effect of expectations of future interaction on reward allocations in dyads: equity or equality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 31: 873-880.
28. Steiner I. 1972. Group Process and Productivity. Academic Press: New York.
29. Von Grumbkow J, Deen E, Steensma H, Wilke HAM. 1976. The effect of future interaction on the distribution of rewards. European Journal of Social Psychology 6: 119-123.
30. Walster E, Walster GW, Berscheid E. 1978. Equity: Theory and Research. Allyn and Bacon: Boston, MA.
31. Williams KD, Karau SJ. 1991. Social loafing and social compensation: the effects of expectations of co-worker performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 61: 570-581.
32. Yamagishi T. 1985. Exit from the group as an individualistic solution to the free rider problem in the United States and Japan. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 24: 530-542.