On geographers and ecological inference

Annals of the Association of American Geographers

Volumn 91, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 281-282

  Johnston, Ron ^a   Pattie, Charles ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGY;

EID: 0035384486     PISSN: 00045608     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/0004-5608.00243     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Burden, B. C., and D. C. Kimball. 1998. A new approach to the study of ticket splitting. American Political Science Review 92:533-44.
2. Cleave, N., P. J. Brown, and C. D. Payne. 1995. Evaluation of methods of ecological inference. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A 158:55-72.
3. Johnston, R. J. 1983. Spatial continuity and individual variability. Electoral Studies 2:53-68.
4. Johnston, R. J. 1985. The geography of English politics. London: Croom Helm.
5. Johnston, R. J. 1998. Book review: A solution to the ecological problem, by Gary King. Environment and Planning A 30:1323-24.
6. Johnston, R. J. 2000. On disciplinary history and textbooks: Or, where has spatial analysis gone? Australian Geographical Studies 38:125-37.
7. Johnston, R. J., and A. M. Hay. 1982. On the parameters of uniform swing in single-member constituency electoral systems. Environment and Planning A 14:61-74.
8. Johnston, R. J. 1983. Voter transition probability matrices: An entropy-maximizing approach. European Journal of Political Research 11:93-98.
9. Johnston, R. J. 1984. The geography of ticket splitting: A preliminary study of the 1976 elections using entropy-maximizing methods. The Professional Geographer 36:291-96.
10. Johnston, R. J., and C. J. Pattie. 1991a. Tactical voting in Great Britain in 1983 and 1987: A new approach. British Journal of Political Science 21:95-108.
11. Johnston, R. J. 1991b. Evaluating the use of entropy-maximizing procedures in the study of voting patterns. Part 1: Sampling and measurement error in the flow-of-the-vote matrix and the robustness of estimates. Environment and Planning A 23:411-20.
12. Johnston, R. J. 1999. Constituency campaign intensity and split-ticket voting: New Zealand's first election under MMP, 1996. Political Science 51:164-81.
13. Johnston, R. J. 2000. Ecological inference and entropy maximizing: an alternative procedure for split-ticket voting. Political Analysis 8:333-45.
14. Johnston, R. J., C. J. Pattie, and J. G. Allsopp. 1988. A nation dividing? Britain's changing electoral map, 1979-1987. London: Longman.
15. Johnston, R. J., C. J. Pattie, I. MacAllister, D. J. Rossiter, D. F. L. Dorling, and H. Tunstall. 1997. Spatial variations in voter choice: Modeling tactical voting at the 1997 general election in Great Britain. Geographical and Environmental Modelling 1:153-79.
16. Johnston, R. J., C. J. Pattie, and A. T. Russell. 1993. Dealignment, spatial polarization, and economic voting: An exploration of recent trends in British voting behavior. European Journal of Political Research 23:67-90.
17. King, G. 2000. Geography, statistics, and ecological inference. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 90:601-6.
18. O'Loughlin, J. 2000. Can King's ecological inference method answer a social scientific puzzle: Who voted for the Nazi Party in Weimar Germany? Annals of the Association of American Geographers 90:592-601.
19. Sui, D. 2000. New directions in ecological inference: An introduction. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 90:579-82.
20. Wilson, A. G. 1970. Entropy in Urban and Regional Modeling. London: Pion.
21. Withers, S. D. 2001. Quantitative methods: Advances in ecological inference. Progress in Human Geography 25 (2):87-96.