Operant behavior suggests attentional gating of dopamine system inputs

Neurocomputing

Volumn 38-40, Issue , 2001, Pages 1161-1167

  Daw, Nathaniel D ^a   Touretzky, David S ^a  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Dopamine; Operant conditioning; Temporal difference learning

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; LEARNING SYSTEMS;

CONCURRENT VARIABLES;

NEUROPHYSIOLOGY;

DOPAMINE;

ALGORITHM; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DECISION MAKING; DOPAMINERGIC SYSTEM; INSTRUMENTAL CONDITIONING; LEARNING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NERVE CELL; NEUROPHYSIOLOGY; NONHUMAN; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE;

EID: 0035384099     PISSN: 09252312     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0925-2312(01)00553-7     Document Type: Article

References (7)

1. W.M. Baum, Optimization and the matching law as accounts of instrumental behavior, J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 36 (1981) 387-403.
2. N.D. Daw, D.S. Touretzky, Behavioral considerations suggest an average reward TD model of the dopamine system, Neurocomputing 32 (2000) 679-684.
3. P. Dayan, S. Kakade, P.R. Montague, Learning and selective attention, Nature Neurosci. 3 (2000) 1218-1223.
4. J. Gibbon, Dynamics of time matching, Psychonomic Bull. Rev. 2 (1995) 208-215.
5. R.J. Herrnstein, Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement, J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 4 (1961) 267-272.
6. R.J. Herrnstein, W. Vaughan, Melioration and behavioral allocation, in: J.E.R. Staddon (Ed.), Limits to action, Academic Press, New York, 1980, pp. 143-176.
7. W. Schultz, P. Dayan, P.R. Montague, A neural substrate of prediction and reward, Science 275 (1997) 1593-1598.