The family: Organic and mechanistic solidarity

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 1, Issue 3, 2001, Pages 22-23

  Ashcroft, Richard ^a  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONFIDENTIALITY; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; FAMILY; GENETIC COUNSELING; GENETIC SCREENING; GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;

GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION; PROFESSIONAL PATIENT RELATIONSHIP;

CONFIDENTIALITY; DISCLOSURE; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; FAMILY; GENETIC COUNSELING; GENETIC SCREENING; HUMANS; PROFESSIONAL-FAMILY RELATIONS;

EID: 0035383279     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/152651601750417865     Document Type: Note

References (8)

1. Doukas, D. J., and J. W. Berg. 2001. The family covenant and genetic testing. The American Journal of Bioethics 1(3):2-10.
2. Durkheim, E. 1984. The division of labor in society. New York: The Free Press.
3. Finkler, K. 2000. Experiencing the new genetics: Family and kinship on the medical frontier. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
4. Giddens, A. 1993. The transformation of intimacy: Love, sexuality, and eroticism in modern societies. Cambridge: Polity Press.
5. Hollis, M. 1998. Trust within reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Marteau, T., and M. Richards, eds. 1996. The troubled helix: Social and psychological implications of the new human genetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Miller, D. 2001. “Family Covenant”: Considerations of trust. American Journal of Bioethics 1(3):20-21.
8. Nelson, H. L., and J. L. Nelson. 1995. The patient in the family: An ethics of medicine and families. New York: Routledge.