Local abundance and regional distribution of tree species of forest fragments in Brazil: A test of models

Revista de Biologia Tropical

Volumn 49, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 489-500

  Leite, Samuel Jorge ^a   Lopes, Frederico Santos ^b  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF MATO GROSSO DO SUL   (Brazil)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Abundance; Biogeography; Core satellite hypothesis; Spatial distribution

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BRAZIL; CLASSIFICATION; ECOSYSTEM; PHYSIOLOGY; TREE;

BRAZIL; ECOSYSTEM; TREES;

EID: 0035383235     PISSN: 00347744     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Brown, J.H. 1984. On the relationship between abundance and distribution of species. Am. Nat. 124: 255-279.
2. Brown, J.H. & B.A. Maurer. 1987. Evolution of species assemblages: effects of energetic constrains and species dynamics on the diversification of the north American avifauna. Am. Nat. 130: 1-17
3. Brown, J.H., D.W. Mehlman & G.C. Stevens. 1995. Spatial variation in abundance. Ecology 76: 2028-2043.
4. Brown, J.H., G.C. Stevens & D.M. Kaufman. 1996. The geographic range: size, shape, boundaries and internal structure. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 27: 597-623.
5. Campos, J.B. & M.C. Souza. 1997. Vegetação. p. 331-342. In Vazzoler, A.E.A.M., A.A. Agostinho & N.S. Hahn (eds.). A planície de inundação do alto Rio Paraná -Aspectos físicos, biológicos e socioeconômicos. EDUEM, Maringá, Paraná, 460 p.
6. Collins, S.L. & S.M. Glenn. 1991. Importance of spatial and temporal dynamics in species regional abundance and distribution. Ecology 72: 654-664.
7. Collins, S.L. & S.M. Glenn. 1997. Effects of organismal and distance scaling on analysis of species distribution and abundance. Ecol. App. 7: 543-551.
8. Eriksson, O. & A. Jakobsson. 1998. Abundance, distribution and life histories of grassland plants: a comparative study of 81 species. J. Ecol. 86: 922-933.
9. Gaston, K.J. 1990. Patterns in geographic ranges of species. Biol. Rev. 65: 105-129.
10. Gaston, K.J. 1996. The multiple forms of the interspecific abundance-distribution relationship. Oikos 76: 211-220.
11. Gaston, K.J. & T.M. Blackburn. 1996. Global scale macroecology: interactions between population size, geographic range size and body size in the Anseriformes. J. An. Ecol. 65: 701-714.
12. Gaston, K.J., T.M. Blackburn & J.H. Lawton. 1997. Interspecific abundance-range size relationship: an appraisal of mechanisms. J. An. Ecol. 66: 579-601.
13. Gaston, K.J. & J.H. Lawton. 1990. Effects of scale and habitat on the relationship between regional distribution and local abundance. Oikos 58: 329-335.
14. Gotelli, N.J. & D. Simberloff. 1987. The distribution and abundance of tallgrass prairie plants: a test of core-satellite hypothesis. Am. Nat. 130: 18-35.
15. Gotelli, N.J. & W.G. Kelley. 1993. A general model of metapopulation dynamics. Oikos 68: 36-44.
16. Hanski, I. 1982. Dynamics of regional distribution: the core and satellite species hypothesis. Oikos 38: 210-221.
17. Hanski, I. 1991. Single-species metapopulation dynamics: concepts, models and observations. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 42: 17-38.
18. Hanski, I., J. Konki & A. Halka. 1993. Three explanations of the positive relationship between distribution and abundance of species, p. 108-116. In R.E. Ricklefs & D. Schluter (eds.). Species diversity in ecological communities: Historical and geographical perspectives. The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
19. IBGE - Fundação Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. 1989. Geografia do Brasil - Região Centro-Oeste. Volume 1. Centro de Documentação e Disseminação de Informações. Rio de Janeiro. 267 p.
20. IBGE - Fundação Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística. 1992. Manual técnico da vegetação brasileira. Série Manuals técnicos em geociências n.o 1. Centro de Documentação e Disseminação de Informações. Rio de Janeiro. 92 p.
21. Johnson, C.N. 1998. Species extinction and the relationship between distribution and abundance. Nature 394: 272-274.
22. Levins, R. 1969. Some demographic and genetic consequences of environmental heterogeneity for biological control. Bull. Ent. Soc. Am. 15: 237-240.
23. Lorenzi, H. 1992. Árvores brasileiras: Manual de identificação e cultivo de plantas arbóreas nativas do Brasil. Plantarum, São Paulo. 368 p.
24. McArthur, R.H. & E.O. Wilson. 1967. The theory of island biogeography. Princeton University, New Jersey. 203 p.
25. Mueller-Dombois, D. & H. Ellemberg. 1974. Aims and methods of vegetation ecology. Wiley, New York. 547 p.
26. Scheiner, S.M. & J.M. Rey-Benayas. 1997. Placing empirical limits on metapopulation models for terrestrial plants. Evol. Ecol. 11: 275-288.
27. SEPLAN-MS - Secretaria de Planejamento. 1989. Macrozoneamento geoambiental do Estado de Mato Grosso do Sul. FINPLAN-MS. Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul. 242 p.
28. Souza, M.C., J. Cilinski & M.B. Romagnolo. 1997. Levantamento Florístico. p. 343-368. In Vazzoler, A.E.A.M., A.A. Agostinho & N.S. Hahn (eds.). A planície de inundação do alto Rio Paraná - Aspectos físicos, biológicos e socioeconômicos. EDUEM, Maringá, Paraná. 460 p.
29. Tokeshi, M. 1992. Dynamics of distribution in animal communities: Theory and analysis. Res. Popul. Ecol. 34: 249-27.